Hi Kevin,
Some answers for your questions!
1. Outlook 2000 is installed, have tried both swedish and english version.
2. Exmerge version is 4.00.021
3. Exmerge is running on w2k sp2 box with exchange 5.5 sp4 installed.
What do you mean by pst-provider?
Regards
//Hakan
Hakan,
A few
Hi,
I've created the folder and there no special rights for c:\exmergedata.
I'm using an admin account so...And yes there are free space.
Have tested on only one mailbox to see how it works!
Regards
//Hakan
Have you created C:\EXMERGEDATA folder?
Exmerge User has rights to this folder?
Errr.. MS only started in the email business because of a little product
called Network Courier! Most people didn't trust that when it started and
CCMail was the product of choice for most businesses. The tables can turn
and it depends on how badly Oracle (or whoever) wants that business.
Kevin
Now you're talking - I qualify!!! Where can I fill in an application form??
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 November 2001 17:55
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
More:
4) Bill Gates and Larry Ellison both wash floors
What do you mean by caches the information store?? If you update the
profile in the right places (and that's why you need to use a
program/script), you shouldn't see a problem. There is a small problem with
Contacts displayed as an Address Book which I'm working on but apart from
that, I don't
Hi,
I wuld like to know how to setup the public folder as a email recipient in
exchange5.5...is ther any other way other than creating a folder in the
container and having the mail id for that folder configured to rec.
mails.Can we create a mailbox directly in the public folder??
Ram.
List
Does anyone know how the Chapura Pocket Mirror synchsonises between Outlook
and Palm PDA? A user has managed to incorrectly synchronise the Palm and
wipe out 2,000 contacts from his Outlook and Palm. I have looked in deleted
items, and delted item recovery tool with the administrator registry
Hi Bonnie
I have just completed this migration myself and have had a few small
hitches. One or two of the mailboxes I had to migrate would not move at
all (I was moving to new hardware), some of the mailboxes also caused
the info store on the new server to die during migration (a bit of an
issue
Hi Bob
Generally most organisations will frown upon the admins having user
access to all mailboxes, but how would they know to start with grin -
what you should do is assign Permissions admin on the mailbox container
and not user permissions then you will both be able to admin mailboxes,
but not
Hi all,
We got a strange problem here, this is what happens:
When a normal user in our Exchange environment creates a new profile in
his Outlook2000 client, his name and exchange server get underlined,
meaning they are both validated; now when that person tries to add
additional mailboxes to the
Title: Message
Hey
Albert
This
is a stab in the dark, but what if you disable integrated Windows Authentication
on your webserver - haven't tried it yet, but it would make
sense.
Cheers
Simon
-Original Message-From: Albert Vasquez
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14
the delayed messages come from the same two senders. according to the
recipient, the delays are intermittent. however, that assertion may be an
artifact since only some of the messages are time sensitive and past
messages have been deleted so I can't check. delays on non-time sensitive
messages
Hi Bob
Shouldn't you be looking at the permissions on the individual Exchange
mailboxes - you can find this in active directory if you look at
advanced features
-Original Message-
From: Bob ten Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 12:12
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
I'm guessing he's never lost any data.
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
How do you know the data loss is 0%?
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
Anybody have docs on MS
"UpdateFB" utility? We are scheduled
to use this this weekendafter we use Guidgen to rebuild the system
folders. Anyone had good/bad experiences with this?
Tips?
David
Kopec? Electronic Messaging Specialist
Technology Services
Anybody have docs on MS UpdateFB utility? We are scheduled to use this
this weekend after we use Guidgen to rebuild the system folders. Anyone had
good/bad experiences with this? Tips?
David Kopec? Electronic Messaging Specialist
Technology Services Solutions
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a small question that i thought you might be able to answer or
advise on, using Exchange 5.5 i want to connect to another Exchange server
on a different IP range in a different domain eg
NTSERVER3 - 192.168.2.13 - MEDIASTERLING
COMMS_SERVER - 192.168.1.13 - STERLING
I know you can use
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
And
how would you know that. If email data is lost between the IMC and the mailbox
how would you know?
-Original Message-From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:59
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
By monitoring the MTS-IN folder. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 15 November 2001 14:31
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Oracle vs. Exchange
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
And how would you know that. If email data is
If mail is stuck in the queue them it only shows up if it is stuck. You can
turn up the event log to log every mail entering and when it happens again
you can filter the log based on the domain name/tcp/ipaddress. You can see
when it got to your exchange box.
This is what I call a whiffer. The
Title: Message
if we
didn't know then would we necessarily care ;)
-Original Message-From: Ellery July
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:31To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs.
Exchange
And
how would you know that. If email data is
I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000.
Any best bets?
Kim
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily in that order.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: looking for hardware
I'm shopping for a new server for exch2000.
Any best bets?
Kim
Title: Message
I
don't. just wondering how someone can say 0%.
-Original Message-From: Simon Taylor
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:40
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs.
Exchange
if
we didn't know then would we
The MTS-IN motor is good for seeing if messages are coming in but not where
they are going.
Even if you use the Mail Database Viewer you basically only get message
good/bad, it came in the IMS, not necessarily that is got delivered to the
correct mailbox(s). Am I missing something?
I know a lot
That is the order I would get them with HP not far behind.
How many users and locations do you have? then let the games begin.
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking
Any Public Folder can receive mail directly. You need to set DEFAULT
permissions to CONTRIBUTOR.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral;
begetting the very thing
Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
Dell, IBM, Compaq..not necessarily
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
I thought
you were referring to Oracle.
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001
9:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange
And how would you know that. If
Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.
-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 14:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start
Title: Message
same
applies to Oracle's claim then...
-Original Message-From: Ellery July
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2001 14:48To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs.
Exchange
I
don't. just wondering how someone can say 0%.
I like Dell! Certainly never had a problem with them!
Same as Compaq - no problem running them either! I do like their Smart Start
stuff!
Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL
HThats all we have here and have never had a problem with them.
Can you elaborate?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
Don't buy Dell in my
I agree too. We are 90% Dell in our office and 10% Compaq. They are both
great servers. We have had no problems whatsoever with our Dell servers.
Even had a hard drive go down on one of them, and plugged a new one in, and
the RAID controller automatically scrubbed it and restored the RAID
I will agree with Clayton. Compaq offers the best tools for setting up
and administering your servers.
-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
Me likes Compaq,
Dell, IBM, offer and do the same
-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
Me likes Compaq, easy to build up the RAID configs using their smart
start disks
It's the config of his palm software that fzcked him... Can you say bye bye
contacts? Sounds like a good time for a test restore...
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Palm
Unless you have a power related failure on a Saturday.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original Message-
From: Simon Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I'll turn up the event log. I've tried Neotrace and found that routes to the
senders in question (which are both in-state and nearby) go through five
states - insignificant, I presume, but makes for an interesting map.
whiffing - exactly - but guess who issues paychecks.
dave
-Original
Oh really! Please elaborate as I've never had any of my Dell servers crash
or have an appearance of instability.
Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin?
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
It is really not the number of states but the number of routers and if any
are slower then others.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive
Mega-dittos on that. Their smart start CD makes server setup a snap.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
I will agree with Clayton. Compaq
My order would be Compaq, IBM, whoever
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
That is the order I would get them with HP not far behind.
How many users
one of the issues with Palm (which I actually prefer over PPC) is that if an
item is deleted on the palm it does not automatically get sent to the
deleted items folder (like it does with PPC).
Don is right the info
ellery july
Technical Lead
Northwest Area Foundation
332 Minnesota
e-1201
St.
Try re-adjusting the feet on the rack!
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.
-Original Message-
From:
Title: Message
I
agree.
-Original Message-From: Simon Taylor
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:00
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs.
Exchange
same
applies to Oracle's claim then...
-Original
What's wrong with beermats? :-)
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 15 November 2001 16:16
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: looking for hardware
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
Try re-adjusting the feet on the rack!
My issues with Dell go back to the last time we all slagged off all the
vendors out there. From that thread I know loads of folks have had good
experiences with their Customer Service, but I never have. I have always
had to wait for 20 minutes on hold once I pressed 3 for server support,
only to
Ditto - We are strictly a Dell shop -- love them.
Haven't had any real problems.
--- Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh really! Please elaborate as I've never had any
of my Dell servers crash
or have an appearance of instability.
Are you sure it isn't an unstable admin?
-Original
I have used Dell for my SQL and exchange server with no hardware problems
and they are not the hardware police Compaq sometimes is.
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Stu, buddy, how are ya. (Don, he is a friend of mine for real) Don's
cool, so don't sweat it, and Stu's pretty switched on as well. There, I
have done my peace keeping for today, back to the bombing campaign!
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
Nor have we had any major problems. And the latest Dell server
setup disk is just as easy to use as Compaq's SmartStart.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely
So from all of the messages in this thread, I deduce that:
Some people think Compaq are good.
Some people think Compaq are bad.
Some people think Dell are good.
Some people think Dell are bad.
Some people think
Hey! There's a pattern forming here!
-Original Message-
From: Glen
Hi all,
We got a strange problem here, this is what happens:
When a normal user in our Exchange environment creates a new profile in
his Outlook2000 client, his name and exchange server get underlined,
meaning they are both validated; now when that person tries to add
additional mailboxes to the
You forgot to add another 36.4Gb drive for hot-swap.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Brian Mead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001 16:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Compaq ML3770. Throw in 3x36.4Gb with a couple 9.1 and you're set. Right
Bob?
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
Try re-adjusting the feet on
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
wrote:
Mega-dittos on that. Their smart start CD makes server setup a snap.
Unless you want to deviate from what Compaq thinks you should do. Then
you are doomed. (Well, I exaggerate, but not by much.)
--
Compaq also has great tech support (in my opinion). Back in my banyan
vines days i had the occaision to call for help on Christmas and on
Thanksgiving -- they had people on the other end of the phone that were very
experienced.
Since our (forced) switch to NT I've only called a couple of
I thought as much, so the Palm software or more accurately the Chapura
Pocket mirror is directly making MAPI calls to Exchange and making a hard
delete of the items? Would be a nice improvement if the software created a
PST file for all deletions, don't you think.
Paul
-Original
My experience with 2 failed RAID drives on our Dell servers: Call tech
support. 10 minutes on hold, get technician. Explain hard drive
self-test notices filling up log. Tech asked how many. I said that I
stopped counting at 100. He said they'd get me a new drive ASAP. In
both cases, I had a drive
1. The closet is about 12' X 15', and I keep the lights nice and low,
with some cool music going all day, so I don't have to put up with that
annoying artificial light we all have the privilege of experiencing in
offices. I call it my closet because there is no window, but that is not
so bad, as
another similar server for offline data restores.
BTW, when did Compaq start making ML3770 servers?
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
You forgot to
My story
Hum I had a similar experience with Compaq on my file server last. I had a
failed memory chip - they sent me two chips which were different them the
originals. They sent those and when I called to ask about why I got them -
the tech told me because the ones I needed were backordered
Using two Dell Exchange servers both as 5.5 and now 2000 i have found them
far less stable than the compaq one our parent company use, you might well
be right they could well be stable but in my experiance they are not,
ultimatly it makes no difference, as long as the server runs and is easily
Is there anyone out there who is experiencing problems with supporting
more than one cc:Mail connector within an Exchange 2000 organization?
In Exchange 5.5, you could have more than one cc:Mail connector as long
as they weren't directly connected to the same post office. In Exchange
2000, the
Touche!
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
Using two Dell Exchange servers both as 5.5 and now 2000 i have found
them
far less stable than the compaq
14 nodes but no discernible delay in any of them now. who knows about
yesterday?
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Long Delays between send and receive
It is really not
yes... some people think!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November, 2001 5:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware
So from all of the messages in this thread, I deduce that:
Some people think Compaq are good.
Some
Brand name.
No best bets. Too many variables.
Also consider what products you are most comfortable with, which vendors you
have a good relationship with.
My favourite is HP.
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I want to archive some of my mail on my server ( just a portion of my
mailboxes ) and get it out of the exchange database.
I know I can do .pst files, but there are some 1400 mailboxes, and I want
the ability to archive any emails more than 1 year old out of all the
mailboxes.
List Charter and
Good
Morning,
Please forgive me if
this question has already been answered, but I have searchedhigh and low
and still can't get things to click right. I am trying to get OWA to work
in our DMZ, here is what I have:
1. Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on a W2k member server
on the inside.
2. A
I would still recommend Exmerge to pst I think.
Or backup, then use Mailbox manager to toast everything older than 1 year,
keeping the backup as your archive.
Or spend money.
William
Original Message-
From: Jeff Jakubiwski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001
Title: 2000 Move mail box upgrade
I am trying to migrate or move 5.5 users and Public folders to Exchange 2000 through a move mailbox upgrade. I have 5.5 on an NT4 server and I am getting errors as follows;
Error: Connecting to destination server.
cn=newuser,,CN=Users,DC=regency,DC=com The
Ladies and gentlemen,
I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0
(btw, this is my first time..so be gentle)
have outlook clients set up and trying to test the system.
I log 2 users into different workstations and attempt to set a test email.
I get:
The connection to the sever has failed.
Title: Message
You
are right. I believe it is 0%.
I've
only experienced data loss as the result of severe hardware failure, oh and from
Computer Associates software.
Both
Oracle and Exchange produce full and complete test restores. Both have had
or do have comprehensive monitors on them,
Ok when I am looking at the Queues for my IMC on my mail servers I see a
few e-mails waiting to be delivered that don't have an originator all it has
is . How do I find out who sent this mail. Running NT 4.0 sp6 Exchange
5.5 sp4
List Charter and FAQ at:
make
sure W2K is using service pack 2. What ports are open on the firewall for
access and what permissions are granted.
I
think ports 1025 and 1026 (not just 1025)higher need to be
open because of RPC. I tend to stay away from this type of set up ,it is (my
feeling) that it is less secure
I'd still like to see some elaboration on this instability you claim. What
is not stable? The RAID Controller, the server itself? What is causing you
to feel this?
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:45 AM
To:
They're NDRs; it's by design; all in the RFCs.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 15 November 2001 17:21
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: No Originator
Subject: No Originator
Ok when I am looking at the Queues for my IMC on
Is the newuser account (in Windows 2000) enabled or disabled?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: NT Admin Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 15 November 2001 17:14
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: 2000 Move mail box upgrade
Subject: 2000 Move mail box upgrade
I am
Title: Message
Hi
I have
had a similar issue when moving mailboxes to a new server - I ran eseutil with
the /g (integrity) on the private store then tried again and it went through
just fine.
Cheers
Simon
-Original Message-From: NT Admin Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
A LOG OFF Possibility will be implemented in Service pack 2
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Hans Willi Kremer
* freiberuflicher Dozent und Berater,
* MCDBA, MCSE +I, MCSD, MCT,
* Schwerpunkte SQL-Server Exchange Server,
* Buchautor zum SQL Server im Galileo-Press Verlag
Title: Nachricht
Situation:
Domain: Windows 2000 with Active
Directory
Mail Service: Exchange 2000 with SP 1 on 3
Servers in 1 Forest - 1
Routinggroup
What have we done? We created 1 public folder named
'Aachen', which has 1 replication on each mail-server (total: 3 replications in
the
Outlook clients set up as POP3 or Exchange clients?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: pop3 and port 25
Ladies and gentlemen,
I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0
Has anyone suggested looking at the SMTP headers - unless they are stripped,
they will provide some indication of when each server in the route receives the
message - of course, they are not all time synched, but it MAY give some
indication - also will show when your IMC receives the message -
Tried installing the Internet Mail Connector?
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: pop3 and port 25
Ladies and gentlemen,
I am running exchange 5.5 on NTserver 4.0
(btw,
We're demo-ing the following Quest software tools ... 2Ma, Inlook and
Spotlight.
Could those of you who are using these products please provide some
feedback?
Thanks
Rob Sargent
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
I am currently looking for an archiving solution too.
Some of the products, I have looked at are:
1. IXOS software - www.ixos.com
2. EAS software (Exchange Archive Software - www.educomts.com)
3. Archive one software - www.c2c.com
Anyone running any of those products and like them? I would
By reading RFC-2821.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/15/01 12:21PM
Ok when I am looking at the Queues for my IMC on my mail servers I see a
few e-mails waiting to be delivered that don't have an originator all it has
is . How do I find out who sent this mail. Running NT 4.0 sp6 Exchange
5.5 sp4
List
You really need to elaborate more when you make a statement like that. I am
running hundreds of Dell servers, desktops and laptops and find that they
are work very well. Please fill us in on the statement you made.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL
I don't know??
is it obvious that I have inherited this with out any exchange exp. at ALL!?
how do I tell
and Rob, do I try to install that (Internet Mail Service) on the sever,
client or both?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code
Title: RE: 2000 Move mail box upgrade
It is enabled
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2000 Move mail box upgrade
Is the newuser account (in Windows 2000) enabled
Title: Attached file stripped off
Anyone knows why Exchange 5.5 sp4 IMS strips off the attachments of my outbound mails. Thanks.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: Message
Is it
Exchange or the recipients mail server? Sounds like an encoding issue to
me...
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: Attached file stripped
Title: Message
Unless
of course, the server is configured in some fashion (e.g. third party
product)to strip attachments...
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Attached file stripped off
How do
you know the IMS is doing it?
William
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:11
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Attached file
stripped off
Anyone knows why Exchange
Do you have multiple containers under your Recipients container? The
offline AB will only allow you to sync one container at a time.
-Original Message-
From: Tianhong Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Title: Attached file stripped off
sounds
like an av solution.
dave
pollak
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001
2:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Attached
file stripped off
Anyone knows why
When I set up my first exchange box I had a similar
problem becaue of my out bound settings in the IMS I
did not have it set up as mime?plain test I changed it
to that and it worked fine.
Chris
--- Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How do you know the IMS is doing it?
William
here's how microsoft says to do it.
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q178/0/73.ASP I'd love to
give it a try if I had a clue.
dave
-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
