Because you don't need an MX record to send anything. Just receive. Try it
out. Set up a IIS SMTP server or anything. It will work. If your
company wants to be picky, then you can do a reverse-DNS lookup on all
incoming mail. But that just means they have to have their DNS working, and
be
Title: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox
Not unless something has changed.
Alternate Recipients apply to inbound mail only. Unless someone else can think
of something, I don't know of a way to accomplish this without Rules.
Possibly, if a server-side rule could be configured, it
Other than this type of plan, there will be nothing that will not take a
large amount of time and effort to do. You may not even legally be able to
do more than this. Check with your legal department.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original
: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002
1:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Future plans 2
What do
you mean legally? If we have the permission of the owner of the domain, there
is no issue.
-Original
Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz
One other thing that you may want to consider is that you are going to have
to wait until your Directory has synchronized before you can add his mailbox
back in. Conversely, you can also follow Q179065 and adjust that value in
the registry. Forcing a directory update also won't hurt.
Also, you
Did you make sure that the users you want to access OWA on this server have
logon locally rights? That might explain your local permissions issue...
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Well, uh, you know, uh, you could always check your event logs and they
would, uh, tell you how much white space you have. What kind of backups are
you doing? Brick-level? (Gasp!). If you are doing normal online
Exchange-aware backups, it should take maybe 2 hours max to back up a 15 gb
We started using file-level AV on our Exchange servers after discovering
that in fact many of them had been infected with other viruses this very
way. As long as you exclude the proper directories, then you should be
fine. Also, get your AV vendor to certify that your file-level AV will be
Go to the Virtual Directory properties,
Directory Security, then edit the Secure Communications. You can force it to
use SSL there and it will only be for the Exchange Virtual Directory. This is
how I set it up and I can verify that it works.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems
You don't assign rights to the mailboxes within Exchange System Manager.
You use Active Directory Users and Computers. And you have to have a user
account created - it is mandatory. It doesn't have to be enabled, but it
has to be there. Once the user account is in place and it has been
Not to be a pain, but the info about the e-mail editor is different than
what you provided. Composing in Rich Text Format is different than what is
being used to do that composing. Can't remember off the top of my head on
OL98, but take a look maybe under Tools, Options - it's either in there
Does it only function as OWA or does it also hold mailboxes? Did you only
install the OWA portion of Exchange, or the full blown?
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Title: Windows XP
Wait for the official release of .NET.
Once that is out, I believe that there will be a supported route. Until then,
if you choose to go the unsupported route, the .NET beta 3 adminpak is
available for download from Microsoft's site somewhere.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
You run the Exchange Optimizer. Let it move the files for you. It does
quite a nice job of it.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:04 PM
To:
-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: relocate transaction log files
You run the Exchange Optimizer. Let it move the files for you. It does
quite a nice job of it.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems
Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline defragmentation.
Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is an
expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it creates a new
database file and then copies all the data in the old file to the new
and expand them
move it back.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Please just look around! What does it
take, 5 seconds to look through the fields you have available? You will find
it under Shares, Sessions. I really don't think that this will give you
the information that you are looking for, but that is how you get
AFAIK, it should be roughly the same as it is for 5.5. Insert CD, run
setup. Setup will detect that you already have Exchange installed, and will
simply re-copy the files, which will then make it Enterprise.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original
You are really better off running OWA on a different box than Exchange.
That's really what it was designed for. Second, if you uninstall the SMTP
Service from IIS, it will NOT shut down the Exchange services. They are
completely separate. But you do need to actually uninstall it, not just
shut
Unfortunately, based on MS Website, that actually sounds accurate. Take a
look here. It basically says that every single device that is used to
access Exchange must have a CAL, as long as it must authenticate.
http://www.microsoft.com/PIRACY/samguide/tools/cal_guide/exchange.asp
Ben Winzenz,
Where in the options did you find it? I haven't yet.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Requesting
Title: RE: OWA usage
There has to be some type of consideration
given to OWA users. As others have mentioned, I always "thought"
that you did not need a separate CAL for OWA if you already had one for that users work
machine/mailbox. You may want to speak to your vendor again and bring
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA usage
There has to be some type of consideration given to OWA users. As others
have mentioned, I always thought that you did not need a separate
, I promise not to post without my first
cup of coffee!
--
Jeff Eggleston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
--
Benjamin Winzenz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:220509@exchangelist...
Try just right-clicking on the message and
choosing
-
From: Benjamin Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
January 17, 2002 12:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
However, the level of
cluster-aware is very dependant on the person that is setting it
up. I can think of some that I would not want setting
I thought it was that the PERC cards
needed to be updated with a newer firmware revision. And IIRC, it was only
specific cards. If I have time, I will look through my archives and check.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
: Friday, January 18, 2002
1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1018
Or just go to the Dell
site.
-Original
Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002
12:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1018
I
Title: RE: Clustering Exchange
However, the level of "cluster-aware"
is very dependant on the person that is setting it up. I can think of
some that I would not want setting up any types of clusters.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Title: RE: Exchange setup question
So it is listed under the DNS suffix as
vgreen.com? I don't see why you shouldn't be able to change
the DNS suffix on the computer. You will, however, have to change your MX
records. When I perform a DIG on your domain, this is what I get. I
am using the
I believe the answer to your question is no. You can run OWA 5.5 on a
Windows 2000 server connecting to a Exchange 5.5 environment, but you cannot
run OWA from Exchange 2000 and have it connect to a 5.5 server. Besides,
event to install the OWA portion of Exchange 2000 requires Active
Title: Message
That is not controlled through Exchange.
It is controlled via a registry setting on every client. The Public folder is
merely used to contain the form that every client must download. Trust me. I
have done that as well.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Don't do brick level backups. It's not worth it. Go read the FAQ's.
www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm.
They are well worth the reading.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Todd Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
What if you try and exmerge out the data at that point? Can you view it as
a .pst?
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Todd Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
That would take a lot of e-mails to e-mail 200 Gig!!!
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Change m:\xxx.com
Title: Mail Relay
Exchange
2000 is supposed to be relay-secure out of the box. So unless you changed
something in the SMTP virtual server properties, then you shouldn't be
relaying.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From:
It doesn't have to be a distribution group. In fact, if you EVER think it
might be used for security purposes, you can set it up as a security group
instead of a distribution group. They can both be mail-enabled.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original
in the systems run quite fast. I
then tried to access the exchange box onsite using owa and it is very
fast and that was even with SSL. What do you think would cause the
discrepency? I'd appreciate your thoughts.
Thanks,
Karen
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
: Automatic gerantion e-mail addresses.
I rebooted the server and the address generated properly.
Stefan
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 15:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Automatic gerantion e-mail
I thought that the now MS supported way was to first install the Windows
2000 adminpak (I know - it won't work if installed, bear with me). Then,
you should be allowed to install the Exchange admin tools, since it looks
specifically for the Windows 2000 adminpak. Once you have installed
RUS. Recipient Update Service. How long did you wait before checking? It
won't always be immediate. You can try running the RUS manually from within
Exchange System Manager. It should then show up.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Automatic gerantion e-mail addresses.
RUS is set to Always run should that not update immediate?
Stefan
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 14:55
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Automatic
Most specifically (and this is the hard part for users to remember) - the
meeting room has to be designated as a resource when it is being booked in
order for it to be autoaccepted. We have the problem here where people want
to add it as a required attendee. I keep having to tell them it
A. I see. You can install the W2K adminpak onto XP, it just doesn't
function. Nice observation, Scott! Thanks.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20,
This is also referenced on MS website in q304718
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: System
! The 2GB Crop tool will get around this if:
a) You don't mind losing data
b) You're in this sh*tty position already.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 December 2001 21:51
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Information Store Limit
Terminal Services. As of right now, that is the only supported way to do it
remotely that I know of.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:25 PM
First thing I would recommend is to re-do your certificate so that it is
correct. You can't fix the last warning about not being issued by a trusted
company, because Verisign or another CA didn't issue it, but you can correct
the first part, although you can add your site to the list of trusted
The website, from what I remember. I'm not in front of my server at the
moment, so I can't give you exact details how I set mine up, but I think
that the site you would put in is the http://servername/exchange site. In
terms of saving the cert, I don't know what to tell you. With the version
of
Title: Message
It's the SSL overhead. It takes a
while.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems
Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan K
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001
11:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Title: Message
With the Exchange/Outlook add-on or no?
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems
Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001
12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
, with the Outloook\exchange option...
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001
11:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 100% CPU when Synch
With the Exchange/Outlook add-on or no?
Ben Winzenz,
MCSE
Network
,
and have seen none of the problems mentioned. I suggest the problem lies
elsewhere, and the original comment that ...a FEW of these (clients) are
pegging the CPU is your clue.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:03 PM
Title: Message
Perhaps then a corrupt OST file, or
corrupt e-mail profile. I would whack the OST file, then re-create it and
re-synch, and if the symptoms still exhibit, delete and re-create the mail
profile.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems
Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
Just remember that there is a hard limit for PST files, which is set at 2GB.
You hit that, the PST is toast. Can't open it any more.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
on delivery than
scanning, so unscanned messages can reach the client. If there's nothing
scanning at the client level, you're in trouble, needlessly.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
It shouldn't use so much that it will kill the server, but what you read is
wrong. Don't limit the amount of RAM used via Optimizer. That is
band-aiding the real problem. Store.exe will use ALL available memory if it
can and needs it. My server has 1gb of mem and Store.exe is humming happily
And this isn't something that everyone should be attemtpting unless you are
well versed in using these utilities and know the risks. Bottom line, if
you aren't sure what is going on, or what is causing the problem, call PSS.
It will be worth the $245 you spend for the call. And you will learn a
No! As I mentioned earlier, this is a band-aid. It's not solving the
actual problem.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:40 PM
To:
Run setup, select custom, de-select everything but Exchange Administrator.
Bingo Bango.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:20 AM
To:
I want to make one comment on this that I found last week. I might be
missing something small, but what I found was that Exchange 2000 allows
relaying by means of using encapsulated SMTP addresses. I know that
this was fixed post-sp3 for Exchange 5.5, but can anyone else test this and
see if it
I got the same little tidbit from one of my Windows 2000 classes. It was
either in one of the exercises, or one of the stupid tricks my instructor
mentioned.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson
LOL!!! That is too funny. This one is going in my humor file! Better yet.
I may even print it out an hang it on my cubicle or something.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I would say also that you need to look at your active connections on your
server. Even though you have disabled the account, I don't think that it
will kill any current connections. Go into server manager on your
Exchange server, and see if that particular user account has any open
connections.
How about
giving us more info about the system setup. RAID? How many
partitions? How did you setup
Exchange? Default everything? The M Drive is a virtual drive, but it is a representation of
the Information Store. So where is
your Information Store? Is the
drive it is on running out of
I don't recall if it was on this list or a different one, but Act as part
of the Operating system is VERY different from Exchange Service Account
Admin rights. VERY. Act as part of the OS is assigned in User Manager, not
ExAdm. It's really a simple error stating that the account you are using
Not necessarily. I use ARGGHHHserve 6.61 and I was able to restore to a
server w/different name. Admittedly, I didn't restore the DIR, but you can
restore the others. You should restore the PUB and PRIV together, and I had
to muck around and run some of the utilities, but eventually got the
Michèle! Where's your quip?
Terry, please include the previous posts. Some of us don't really want to
dig back through all the posts and figure out which 2 articles you are
referring to. You are wanting to open up relaying in Ex2000? Or prevent
it? If prevent it, Exchange 2000 is
Title: RE: Outlook Licenses with Exchange?
Since no one on this list can quote MS licensing
policies, it would be best to contact your MS Licensing Rep. Heck, ask the guy you are buying
Exchange from. They should be able
to answer it for you.
Ben
Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems
Not true Lyle. Consult the DR Whitepaper from MS. You can most certainly restore to a
server with a different name, you just cant restore the Directory. But, IIRC, as long as there are other
servers that contain the Directory, you can run the KCC and it will rebuild the
directory on the
Really, I beg to differ. I've got it set up at home to check both Exchange
and Internet mail (still have some POP accounts from past ISP's). Doesn't
give me any problems at all.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From:
Simon, Another option you may want to consider is that BE can be restored
by using NTBackup. At least, last time I checked. Since all the MS
Whitepapers point to using NTBackup, it could make the restore scenario a
bit easier to follow. Worth a try?
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems
Don't know if it works in OWA 5.5, but in 2K, you can simply enter the first
character of your search as a space and it will list all entries in your
GAL.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL
I would be
running a backup with NTBackup WAY before I would be attempting to run ISINTEG. Given the knoweldeg (or lack or it)
exhibited by various CA techs, I trust them about as far as I can throw
them. Now, if you cant get a good
backup with NTBackup, then maybe its time to call PSS,
Don't sweat it, Michèle. No one else thinks you are offensive in any way.
Everyone that knows you would back up what you said. Many others already
have.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can't install it on NT4. Period. Exchange 2K REQUIRES Active
Directory. Read through the documentation. :)
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: John Sparrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19,
Is it just on the Exchange server, or can you initiate this search from
another workstation as well and connect to the M drive on Exchange? If it
is just on Exchange, is it really that big a security risk? Do you intend
to have others working directly on your Exchange server? Have you tried to
You are missing the point here, Markus. It is clearly stated by MS that if
you want to employ a Front-End/Back-end architecture (very specific roles
that can be actually assigned to the servers), then the Front-end server HAS
to be Enterprise. An example of FE/BE would be if you want to access
In short, no. You still have to do it manually. Easiest solution, make a
checklist of stuff to do when someone is hired. I think we putzed around
with using an Outlook Form to do that at one point. You can assign
different portions of the checklist to different people. If one part isn't
Please provide Exchange specs. Vers, SP, NT SP, etc. Also, are you running
any AV on the Exchange box? How is WINS set up? Any static entries in
WINS?
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Honnold, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
NO! It blocks them on the Client side. You are, after all, relying on a
security patch on the Client to enforce those settings. Blocking them on the server is having
an AV package strip them as they are scanned, before they get into the
Information Store. More clear?
Ben
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Viruses
I figured it had to be the client if it
wasn't the server. Thanx
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001
7:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Viruses
Aha - didn't look close enough. Looks as though it is the TROJ_VOTE.A
virus. Never mind on that. Still glad I am blocking .exe's though.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: John Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
The only thing that I will say is Read and Follow the Disaster Recovery
White Paper. If you haven't done that yet, go do it, then come back and
ask. If you have read it, read it again. It outlines in EXACT detail every
step you need to do in order to do a DR restore as you did (separate LAN).
Definitely Exchange Server. 512MB RAM is even overkill for a PDC. It just
doesn't need it. I'd be lucky if I had more than 128mb in any of my Domain
Controllers.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Curtiss
Title: Arcserve and Exchange 5.5
Markus,
Please
provide some more information. Are
you trying to back up an Exchange Server and getting this error? Or another server? Youve got Arcserve 6.61. What Service pack? Do you have Sp2a for Arcserve
installed? On the Arcserve server
and ALL
Title: Arcserve and Exchange 5.5
LOL! That is too funny! True all the same, but very funny! [1]
1. I can say that because I use (am abused
by?) Arcserve.
Ben
Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems
Administrator
Peregrine
Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William
Hehe - guess someone found out that recall doesn't always work! Let that be
today's lesson!
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:41 AM
1. Have you rebooted the Exchange server since sp1?
2. What sp level is Outlook 2K? IIRC, updating it to SR-1a made some
changes in the way it contacted an E2K server (may not be worded correctly,
but I think the concept is correct). Other than that, DNS is what should be
checked.
Ben Winzenz,
Is it just me, or is that all kind of screwed up. How come you can access
the Public Folder from OWA, but not from Outlook? That doesn't make any
sense at all. You say you set up a second Public Folder Tree? You mean one
other than the All Public Folders, or what? Be more specific please.
sent to this list
That is correct. The public folder is NOT under All Public Folders. Per
MS, MAPI clients cannot see anything but the All Public Folders. All
other trees can be seen via other clients such as OWA.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Chris,
Are you referring to Automatic Name Checking? In OL2K, it is part of it by
default. Check under Tools, Options, E-mail Options (button), Advanced
E-mail options (button), it's a check box on the bottom. But, it doesn't
always work immediately.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems
If you load the Windows-based RAID management software, you can perform this
battery reconditioning or whatever it is called, from within NT. I have
done it on a few of my servers. Works well.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
6months ago and
in 3months it started reporting in event viewer controller battery needs
reconditioning again.
Emmanuel Martey
Wonna Be MCSE, CNA
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10/09/2001 14:33
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dell
Title: Message
Because its
more complicated. That practice is
only necessary if you are going to restore the Directory as well as the IS. If you keep it on the same domain and
just install Exchange in new org and site with the same name as the production,
you can still restore the IS, and
Subject: RE: Recovery server
Geez, with all Peregrine's money you
should be doing whatever you need to.
-Original
Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001
6:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Recovery server
(Dream mode
Just
to make sure that were all clear, youve done the following, right?
New
server 4 hard drives set up in 2 separate mirrors. (as someone else
suggested, if you can get your hands on one more, you would ultimately be best
off to have one raid 1 mirror for the OS, and a raid 5 for the
If the company isn't big enough to use Exchange, or doesn't want to pay for
it, what is wrong with using IIS SMTP Server? Won't this accomplish what
you want? I think you'll find it should have the functionality that you
(they) need.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine
Exchange 2000 comes out of the box relay secure. However, if you want to
look at the settings, you really want to manage it with Exchange System
Manager. Go to the Administrative Groups, and parse down into your server,
protocols, smtp. Default virtual smpt server. Go to the properties of it,
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Additional Mailboxes
HOW?
Where is that info available??
Thanks.
-Original
Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 August 2001 16:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Additional Mailboxes
Um oh yeah
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
