RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!

2002-07-16 Thread Dan Schwartz
an open relay.. http://www.abuse.net/relay.html Thanks, Joe Irvine -Original Message- From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:30 AM To:MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Importance:Low Look

General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]

2002-07-16 Thread Dan Schwartz
. -Original Message- From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 09:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! OK, does anyone have a list of the ports Exchange 5.5 uses, besides 25 110? Also, if anyone wants

RE: IT staff behavior

2002-07-16 Thread Dan Schwartz
I'm sure that SOMEONE in management would complain if they knew what was going on. I'd start with the guy who wrote the PO /or signed the check for the Exchange license, telling them that they aren't getting what they paid for... -Original Message- From: Andrew J. Lund, MCSE

RE: IT staff behavior

2002-07-16 Thread Dan Schwartz
Read http://www.techtales.com for the answer... -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: IT staff behavior You would think. But then again some people think that just because they have job that they can't be replaced. Which really

Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!

2002-07-15 Thread Dan Schwartz
OK gang... A small Exchange 5.5/SP4 server I recently set up was repeatedly *hacked* over the weekend, according to the logs; and I'm trying to figure out if I made an error configuring the IMC. The symptom is that it appears to be relaying by unauthorized parties. The

Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!

2002-07-15 Thread Dan Schwartz
OK gang... A small Exchange 5.5/SP4 server I recently set up was repeatedly *hacked* over the weekend, according to the logs; and I'm trying to figure out if I made an error configuring the IMC. The symptom is that it appears to be relaying by unauthorized parties. The

RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!

2002-07-15 Thread Dan Schwartz
: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! The 4188 errors are typical if you ARE relay secure, you use 'only authenticated users can relay' and others try. Where do you think you are 'hacked'? -Original Message- From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED

RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!

2002-07-15 Thread Dan Schwartz
Yes, it's connected, and the DNS servers have been pointed at it for about a week... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Is it connected to the internet? -Original Message- From: Dan Schwartz

Change in IMS antirelaying settings betweem SP3 SP4?!

2002-07-10 Thread Dan Schwartz
OK, I have a weird one on my hands; and the docs seem to lead me in circles. [Yeah, yeah... it's like putting me in a round room and telling me to piss in the corner...] Anyway, I rolled out a small Exch5.5/SP4 server on top of a self-contained NT4 PDC with DNS service for a 5

RE: Change in IMS antirelaying settings betweem SP3 SP4?!

2002-07-10 Thread Dan Schwartz
: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Change in IMS antirelaying settings betweem SP3 SP4?! OK, I have a weird one on my hands; and the docs seem to lead me in circles. [Yeah, yeah... it's like putting me in a round room and telling me to piss in the corner...] Anyway

RE: Relay

2002-06-26 Thread Dan Schwartz
to me as I'm a DIGEST subscriber. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 8:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Relay Hey guys, Let's slow down a bit and talk about relaying - The good, the bad

RE: [mac-nt] Dealing with the tidal wave of spam: Cloudmark

2002-06-21 Thread Dan Schwartz
I've been playing with Cloudmark 1.00ß2 and it seems pretty good... Give it a whack. Cheers! Dan -Original Message- From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: [mac-nt] Dealing with the tidal wave of spam Anyone here using Cloudmark

RE: [mac-nt] Dealing with the tidal wave of spam: Cloudmark

2002-06-21 Thread Dan Schwartz
How do you like it so far? I'm having a blast with Cloudmark; though it's bogging down: At 6AM EDT it was quick; six hours later it's slow as mud as their server bogs down. There are still a few rough edges, most notably with NT4 (and apparently Win2k; unknown about XP) installation. But, it's

Microsoft solicits feedback on Mac products

2002-06-04 Thread Dan Schwartz
Time to holler at Kevin Browne - Again! - loud long for a unified POP3 Exchange MacOS client. From MacWindows http://www.macwindows.com/: Microsoft solicits feedback on Mac products. May 30, 2002 -- Microsoft's Macintosh Business Unit has set up a web page asking for feedback

Please, spare us from Policy Patrol!

2002-01-18 Thread Dan Schwartz
Starting at the 6th paragraph, read about how Red Earth's Policy Patrol is the Mother Of All Disclaimer Software http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/28/23732.html: Now, if that corporate caveat really rattled your cage, there's more bad news. In a move that has a ring of horrible

RE: Please, spare us from Policy Patrol!

2002-01-18 Thread Dan Schwartz
? Heh heh heh... Methinks you need a serious deflation of your ego! :) Subject: Please, spare us from Policy Patrol! From: Dan Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:07:46 -0500 X-Message-Number: 38 Starting at the 6th paragraph, read about how Red Earth's Policy Patrol