This is a good link : http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/gg176682, as
it contains details of load balancers that have completed solution testing with
Exchange 2010 - and also provides links to the relevant documentation.
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 03
In addition to what Phil said in his reply, for a good overview of the load
balancing options I'd recommend reading this topic :
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff625247.aspx
FYI, if you go down the hardware load balancer route, here's the page that
lists the hardware load balancers
FYI - two new Exchange 2010 tested solutions papers released:
Exchange 2010 Tested Solutions: 15000 Mailboxes in Two Sites Running Hyper-V
on Unisys ES7000 Servers and Hitachi Adaptable Modular Storage 2000 Family
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=4d83e5ac-7d9a-47
I recently saved some of the online sections as PDFs for reading on a Kindle
- works well when travelling by train, etc, and I guess you could always
print those. But I know what you mean; I prefer printed material sometimes.
Also, I've found that the online content is obviously updated more
I've read Exchange 2010 Best Practices from MS Press; I'm currently reading
Tony's Exchange 2010 Inside Out book on a Kindle. Together they make up a
pretty impressive pair of books that will cover what you need to know. You
might want to know that you can get both together in a pretty good
I believe it was because the group has to be universal for the membership to
be in a GC, which got around issues of missing messages for non-universal
groups. This first started in E2K7 IIRC.
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: 07 February 2011 17:35
To: MS-Exchange
installed on the client(s)?
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 January 2011 16:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New Exchange 2010 Installation
Re: certs, depends on what you want to do. Outlook 2010 doesn't play well
with self-signed certs, for example. It may
Twitter was clogged with this announcement earlier - must be something
people want. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 27 January 2011 17:55
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: New MS Exchange Blog: GAL Segmentation, #Exchange Server 2010
Coexisting with legacy Exchange at all?
Also a few things off the top of my head:
1. Might want to run the Exchange Pre-Deployment Analyzer - this has
picked up some AD issues for me in the past
2. What are you doing about certs?
3. Don't forget things like the filter
In addition to what Richard has just said, you might like to look through the
table of failures at the link below and use that as a reference point:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd298067.aspx
From: Stuart Brainerd [mailto:sbrain...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 January 2011 16:12
To:
Yep, it was in 2007. Also, this cmdlet has the -VerifyRecipient parameter
that might (I say might) prove useful in this case to test an individual
user.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 25 January 2011 15:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: White List
not to use it from the off?
Thanks,
Paul
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 January 2011 16:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New Exchange 2010 Installation
Coexisting with legacy Exchange at all?
Also a few things off the top of my head:
1. Might want
As Kevin said you can put it anywhere as it's just a file share. There is
no requirement to make sure the DAG operating system and FSW operating
system versions match. The only thing I would say about putting the FSW on
a domain controller is that you are giving the Exchange Trusted Subsystem
Just a FYI, you won't see 1221s in Exchange 2010 anymore, since the way
maintenance runs has changed. The cmdlet you ran is the way to do this now,
as you've seen. If you're interested in knowing more about this, the link
below is a good read.
Do you use public folders and if so, where are the databases located? Also,
what is the service pack and update rollup version of Exchange 2010?
From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu]
Sent: 19 January 2011 18:08
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Expected or not?
We
-01 with a replica on
S-EXCMB-02.
Service Pack 1 with Rollup 2 installed
Thank you for any ideas.
-Robert
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Expected or not?
Do you use public folders
Why not use the Exchange Profile Analyzer? It's a free download from
Microsoft. Here are the details on what it can do (about half-way down are
the details on what it collects):
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb508856(EXCHG.65).aspx
From: Leedy, Andy
Have you yourself manually created an eml file/test message and placed it
into the folder, just to rule out what the app is doing?
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: 14 January 2011 20:15
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What would cause pickup
I think Kevin is talking about the ChangeExpiredPasswordEnabled registry key
- but I thought you had to add the key for this to work. It's detailed in
Anderson's article here:
http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2010/management
In addition to what Michael said, for reference there's a comprehensive list
of Exchange 2010 perfmon counters available at the link below - split into
the different Exchange 2010 roles. You could look through these and pull
out those of interest, based on the services you want to monitor.
Neil - that article is similar to what I remembered - but I remembered
something about 2007. Or maybe my memory is failing in my old age :)
So you missed the bit before the registry key details that states This
feature was introduced in Exchange Server 2007 SP3? ;)
On Wed,
Neil - that article is similar to what I remembered - but I remembered
something about 2007. Or maybe my memory is failing in my old age :)
So you missed the bit before the registry key details that states This
feature was introduced in Exchange Server 2007 SP3? ;)
On Wed,
time since I touched Exchange.
Should we apply that reg hack anyway?
Thanks
On 1/5/11, Neil Hobson nhob...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil - that article is similar to what I remembered - but I
remembered
something about 2007. Or maybe my memory is failing in my old age :)
So you missed the bit
There are people with PF databases that are many hundreds of GB in size.
Heh, remember this?
http://blogs.technet.com/b/ewan/archive/2008/04/25/the-biggest-file-i-ve-eve
r-seen-3tb-pub-edb.aspx
J
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 30,
That stuff is all stored in the message tracking logs. You can probably still
find a copy of LogParser and do this for free, otherwise commercial products
like Promodag Reports or Quest MessageStats are available.
-Original Message-
From: Margo Blasko
Properties of the group on the advanced tab.
From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:kevan.dickin...@cmi-plc.com]
Sent: 18 November 2010 10:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem sending email to a Distribution List
How do I check which is the expansion server? We have 5 servers in
885661
E:kevan.dickin...@nsf-cmi.com
W:www.nsf-cmi.com
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 November 2010 10:56
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem sending email to a Distribution List
Properties of the group on the advanced tab.
From: Kevan
Manager
NSF-CMI
23 Lodge Road
Hanborough Business Park, Long Hanborough,
Oxford, OX29 8SJ, UK
T:+44 01993 885661
E:kevan.dickin...@nsf-cmi.com
W:www.nsf-cmi.com
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 November 2010 12:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem
2010 all the way here.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Reis [mailto:jr...@soastc.org]
Sent: 04 November 2010 18:19
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: What to upgrade too? Exchange 2007 or 2010?
We are going to be upgrading our old Exchange 2003 in the near future (several
months). I am
Mathew | ICT Consultant
ICT Professional Services
Path Solutions
Tel: +965 24824600 Ext. 703
Fax: +965 24824500
http://www.path-solutions.com/ www.path-solutions.com
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 3:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
I'm not sure of the scope of your question here. Do you mean best practice
for setting them up, i.e. use the built-in capabilities of Exchange 2007?
Or are you referring to any best practices for the policies, etc?
From: Liby Philip Mathew [mailto:lmat...@path-solutions.com]
Sent: 01
You'd think there would have to be some consolidation in this area soon.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 20 October 2010 04:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using Quest Exchange Archiver?
80-ish from the small to the large.
Regards,
I always thought you could use LCR with iSCSI storage over a WAN or LAN, so
technically a copy could be stored elsewhere. Not that I'd recommend it.
And not that I ever installed LCR in production, either. :)
-Original Message-
From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk]
Sent: 14
Does the Set-MailboxFolderPermission cmdlet do what you want?
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com]
Sent: 13 October 2010 15:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 calendar permissions and powershell
Hi chaps,
Is it possible, with powershell and
From http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb125224.aspx and under the
/PrepareAD section:
You must run this command on a computer in the same domain and in the same
Active Directory site as the schema master. Setup will make all
configuration changes to the schema master to avoid conflicts
This might help:
http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2007/monitoring
-operations/creating-graphical-reports-exchange-2007-part2.html
From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]
Sent: 30 September 2010 12:11
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Presumably you have an SMTP Connector configured on Exchange 2003 with an
address space of * and whatever cost you assigned to it, meaning all
Internet email goes via this connector. When you introduced Exchange 2010,
it created a two-way interop RGC between the Exchange 2010 server and the
.
So is this send connector being used? I will disable it to see.
Are the RCGs visible in the EMC or do I need to go to the command shell.
Thanks again
Andy
_
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 August 2010 10:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 06 August 2010 15:56
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail
From Exchange 5.0 to Exchange 14.1. :-)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson
have been me...
Mark Hanji [1]
Friday Haiku!
Post from years past
Swinc Swync boyer or wincoop
Tubes Live Forever
[1] ::shudder:: and ::lol::
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:neil.hob...@silversands.co.uk]
Sent: 19 February 2002 14:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Couldn't agree more with the sentiments on the list. Michael has helped me
many times, usually with a tricky bit of PowerShell code. The last time I
met Michael was in the lobby of the Westin Seattle a couple of years ago and
he was still hammering away on the laptop - I think writing the
In addition to what has already been said, let's talk a little about your
statement a backup system isn't really required. What you're referring to
there is Exchange native data protection and if you go down this route there
are some very clear things that you need to consider.
For example,
two to three months ago. There's backup for disaster
recovery, then there's backup for user stupidity.
From: bounce-9036114-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9036114-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Neil
Hobson
Sent: 29 July 2010 09:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin
] On Behalf Of Neil
Hobson
Sent: 29 July 2010 10:00
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 DAG and backup options/recommendations.
But that's the point of single item recovery. For example, if you keep
backups for 90 days you can set single item recovery on all mailboxes to 90
days
Might be worth checking out the New-InboxRule cmdlet in Exchange 2010.
From: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net]
Sent: 28 July 2010 07:03
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Deliver to subfolder
Good luck with that one. The manage
25GB was available ages ago within Exchange Online:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/cloudservicesexperts/archive/2010/03/17/exchange-
online-updated-to-provide-25gb-mailbox-by-default.aspx
A few considerations are things like the OST size and performance on some
older hardware, and also the
100.
From http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd638137.aspx
Each Mailbox server can host a maximum of 100 databases (total combined
number of active and passive databases). The total number of databases
equals the combined number of active and passive databases on a server. The
Perhaps he's getting confused with the fact that you can use Exchange 2010
STD in a DAG as well as Exchange 2010 ENT. Taken from Planning for High
Availability and Site Resilience
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd638104.aspx
DAGs use Windows Failover Clustering technology, and as a
That's only actually required if you have multiple paths between the E2K3
and E2K10 routing groups. In the original post, only a single E2K3 server
and a single E2K10 server was quoted, so I personally wouldn't bother with
this.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 26
://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization
That's only actually required if you have multiple paths between the E2K3
and E2K10 routing
I'd just like to add to what Michael said and note that in my last
deployment of Exchange 2010 the NLB cluster name didn't match the external
OWA name and also that the NLB cluster name was not in the cert list, but
the CAS array name obviously was. It's important to distinguish between NLB
You'd have to do it the other way round as the CAS role is installed first
(or CAS/HT in your case). You'd need at least one Exchange 2010 CAS and HT
to talk to the Exchange 2010 mailbox server as they don't talk to other
versions, so in the 10 seconds I've thought about this (disclaimer!):
P.S. mailbox, hub transport, CAS, topical content, blah blah… Carry on…
cat...egorizer
From: Brad Metzler [mailto:bmetz...@cu-portland.edu]
Sent: 19 March 2010 16:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Friday funnies
John, in my personal experience, I find that outdoor cats left
You don't, at least I didn't on the CAS array I built last week. I believe
it'll use the CAS servers in that AD site as a CAS array exists within the
site only. If you do a Get-ClientAccessArray, you should see the Members
attribute set to your CAS servers already.
Don't forget that any
I agree netstat will work as I used that last week to confirm my client was
connecting to one of the CAS servers in the array using a static port
mapping.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 15 March 2010 13:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: view which
HA! Well, it just so happens that I've not read this list for a while as
I'm currently working away on await for it...Notes to Exchange 2010
project. It just so happens I've just read this post. :) It also just so
happens I'm not doing the Notes stuff here, a colleague has that delightful
a sounding board ;)
Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
benso...@pa.msu.edu
517-884-5469
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 CAS/HT reduandancy/load balance
: Suppress OOF to Distribution Lists
I know Neil Hobson and Simon Butler (both Exchange MVPs from the UK) also
read and respond on this list. I don't know if they are attending or not.
William Lefkovics used to read and respond on this list, but I've not seen
him respond here in a long time; I'm
You might want to read an article I wrote that gives you the 30,000 foot
view of Exchange 2010 high availability here:
http://www.simple-talk.com/sysadmin/exchange/exchange-2010-high-availability
/
Be aware that the 2-server deployment will require a hardware load balancer
for the CAS role
You'd create a CAS array for RPC client access, since that's what Outlook
(MAPI) connects to. It might be worth reading Brian's post below as it
contains a lot of background info as well as the NLB stuff. Also, Google
for Henrik Walther's NLB article at msexchange.org which although for
Exchange
The Quest Migration Suite for Exchange could go from 5.5 to 2007 but I'm not
sure if it has been updated for 2010 yet. Might be worth checking.
-Original Message-
From: John Stevens [mailto:j...@js-internet.co.uk]
Sent: 26 January 2010 14:00
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
The steps required depend on the server role that you're activating. If you
have an active/passive approach to your data centres, and have configured
different namespaces for them (which is a feature I like) then be aware that
site resilience is considered a manual process. Have you read through
I'm confused. You're talking site resiliency, then say just an Exchange
server going down which could be translated to high availability. Which is
it? What's your scenario and goal?
From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: 11 January 2010 18:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
For a minute there I thought you said you had 5.5 Exchange users. ;)
From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com]
Sent: 11 January 2010 19:42
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How many Exchange Admins do you have???
It is just me, and I have 55 Exchange users, I also do
Sounds like you've enabled lots of logging already. I don't tend to enable
diagnostics logging unless troubleshooting a problem. You could consider
enabling agent logging too.
From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 January 2010 21:01
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Protocol logging on the receive connectors
From: McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com]
Sent: 30 November 2009 16:04
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 Relay
I have setup 2 servers for anonymous relay with our Exchange 2007 Hub
Transport Server. One works and
Ah yes, but the OP asked for an online defrag utility, for which I
recommend...Exchange itself! The Exchange online maintenance process does
just fine. ;)
If it was for an offline defrag utility, I'd agree with you. J
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: 16
If you use the shell, you can move up to 30 mailboxes simultaneously,
although I suspect that with the full 30 the bottleneck will be elsewhere.
Good that you pointed out the dumpster contents issue after a move-mailbox
operation though - often overlooked.
From: John Cook
-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 12:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange 2007 Online defrag?
If you use the shell, you can move up to 30 mailboxes
Nope, that has been surprisingly absent. I guess it wasn't so long after
UR9 so the list of fixes in SP2 that weren't in UR9 may be small anyway.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com]
Sent: 10 September 2009 18:41
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
In addition to what Peter said, always ensure that you read the release
notes for updates and service packs. The deployment order is clearly listed
in the release notes for SP2.
http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/3/E/83E9DB24-0041-4F7E-A0DD-26043BB
F7CAA/RelNotes.htm
From: Leedy,
Nope, not out of the box. Either create an additional mailbox and use the
From field in Outlook or use a 3rd party app like:
http://www.ivasoft.biz/choosefrom.shtml
From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com]
Sent: 10 September 2009 16:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Or possibly use the SubmissionServerOverrideList parameter of the
Set-MailboxServer cmdlet.
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: 30 July 2009 17:07
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hub Transport installtion question
How about stopping the Exchange
http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2007/high-avail
ability-recovery/deploying-exchange-2007-sp1-ccr-cluster-windows-server-2008
-failover-cluster-part1.html
From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]
Sent: 01 July 2009 16:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Well, I’m a Limey so not authoritative on this one, but I always thought it
was poking a bit of fun at the gambling laws of Wisconsin when they banned
things like lotteries, etc.
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 June 2009 13:50
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Its all about the number of items in the core folders, like Inbox, Sent
Items, Calendar, etc, and also restricted views. In Exchange 2003, the
recommendation was to keep the number of items in these folders 5,000. In
Exchange 2007, the recommendation is not to exceed 20,000 items (as long as
?
~Kevinm WLKMMAS
My life http://www.hedonists.ca http://www.hedonists.ca/
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 7:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Large Mailboxes Performance
Its all about the number of items in the core folders, like
Obviously what everyone else said (Outlook or OWA) but there's also 3rd
party options if you are doing this regularly for lots of users (you
probably aren't but I figured I'd post the link below for the edification of
the list members anyway) J
You can use the MoveAllReplicas.ps1 script first to make sure all replicas
aren't on the source server.
Then use the Get-PublicFolderStatistics cmdlet. If that shows folders, you
can't remove the PF database. If there are folders that contain data, you
need to look at why these aren't
Is this possibly the old temp table issue?
http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/50422/have-you-checked-your-smtp-m
ailbox-temporary-tables-lately.html
From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com]
Sent: 13 March 2009 16:37
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SMTP Issue?
Yep, that's been the case with all of my SCR deployments to date.
The only slight difference with some designs is that the standby cluster is
sometimes just a single node cluster (initially, anyway)
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: 11 March 2009 14:54
, this presumes Outlook 2007 or higher in the
environment.)
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 SCR -- Hardware?
Yep, that's been the case with all of my SCR deployments to date.
The only
Like Troy said, what have you actually done so far? How are you
replicating, etc?
Also, there are quite a few things that you can check out - I've detailed
some here:
http://www.msexchange.org/articles/Public-Folder-Replication-Troubleshooting
.html
-Original Message-
From: John
Doesn't the download contain a load of UM language packs you probably won't
need? I seem to recall binning most of those to make it fit single layer.
From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 7:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Download too big
The Exchange Profile Analyzer gives you unread message counts, but I don't
think you can tie the counts to the owners of the mailbox (going from
memory, I think each mailbox is given a unique number rather than tying it
to the owner). Still, it would give you counts of unread messages.
Belated? Isn't it the fourth Thursday in November or something like that?
Which means tomorrow I think.
As for the turkey, you'll be eating that for another 30 days afterwards too.
J
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 November 2008 10:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Are your Exchange 2007 servers running on Windows 2008?
From: Domingue, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 October 2008 15:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 07 prompting for passwords
All,
We have Outlook users who are prompted for a password multiple times daily.
disagree with the answer below, but if you do go for a commercial
cert (for outside OWA for example) consider a wildcard cert and use it
everywhere. Much more cost effective. 200 bucks or so from GoDaddy.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28
, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 October 2008 16:55
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 07 prompting for passwords
Yes they are.
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 07
Is the missing address a new user? If so, it sounds like the OAB hasn't
rebuilt correctly or this Outlook user hasn't downloaded the OAB updates.
I'd set OAB diagnostics logging to medium or higher then force the OAB to
rebuild (be careful if you have a huge organization). Check the event log
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Cache mode issue
It is a new user.OAB? = Outlook Address Book?
How/Where do I set OAB diagnostics?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 October 2008 10:03
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Cache
We have customers here in the UK that have deployed E2K7 totally on virtual
servers (VMware). Other (larger) customers have deployed Hub/CAS on
virtual, mailbox on physical, etc. All good news as far as I'm aware (as
long as it's designed correctly of course!)
-Original Message-
From:
A custom MTA? External.exe perhaps? J
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 September 2008 17:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Hotmail
When I want something to be true, I just upload it to wikipedia. - Stephen
Colbert
Last I heard from a Microsoft
For just 20 users you can put the mailbox, HT and CAS roles all on a single
server. I can't see the point of implementing a single mailbox server with
two HT servers for redundancy since if the mailbox server dies it's game
over until you get that sorted. Also, if you need high availability and
Also, there are a couple of books you can grab that are focused on Exchange
and PowerShell such as:
http://www.sapienpress.com/exchange.asp
http://www.amazon.com/Professional-Windows-PowerShell-Exchange-Programmer/dp
/0470226447/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8
Indeed. The Spam Arrest account is configured to poll the 'normal' account
and pull messages into it, etc.
From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 May 2008 18:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Stu - request to remove user?
Can you search for lauracoe? I bet the
Regarding SCR, that's because it's a site resilience solution and not an HA
solution. In my experience, most customers who want site resilience expect
and understand that manual steps are required to get the system back up and
running as they ultimately want to control when the failover occurs.
Do you have Show updates ticked in Add/Remove programs? Mine shows up.
From: Administrator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 March 2008 12:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 SP1 Rollup 1
Does anyone know how to determine if the following Exchange 2007 Rollup has
://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 8:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: fast way to delete an Exchange Queue
I dated a wonderful black girl just like that.
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
If you can get your hands on it, aqadmcli.exe should do the trick.
From: Ben Nordlander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 January 2008 18:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: fast way to delete an Exchange Queue
I have a bunch of emails backed up due to a failed archive/journeling
1 - 100 of 516 matches
Mail list logo
