Title: Message
We plan to move completely to XCHG2K (native) beginning
in 03.
Here's the environment:
35 sites running WIN2K (SP2) DC's
in native mode in a Single domain/forest
XCHG 5.5 (SP4)
MS DOES NOT recommend running XCHG2K on a DC that
is a GC due to LDAP port conflicts.
Title: RE: STORE.EXE 99% CPU exchange 2000 SP3
Could be your Anti-Virus. Is that running on the server? IF so, who's and what version is it?
If you have AV on the server try cycling the AV service. If that doesn't correct it, rebooting may help.
-Rick
-Original Message-
From:
Title: RE: Virus Detected
I just got one as well..
Sounds like [EMAIL PROTECTED] needs to correct something on it's MFAV settings.
-Rick
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
JET RED, not JET Blue, was used for Exchange 4.0 because the original code was purchased from the team in England upon which the current 5.5 flavor was final of. XCHG2K was a change of most of the code. For those that have looked into the depths of
Title: RE: Exc5.5 to Exc 2000 question
Preferably running in Native Mode.. but you can do mixed. Native is MS preferred.
-Rick
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 1:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exc5.5
Title: RE: Exchange e-mail analyzer.
Try NetIQ. They have some Exchange solutions that are cheaper. OF course, some that aren't too.
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange
Title: Message
Do you know your secondary MX doesn't
resolve to anything?
This can cause additional problems.. even though you have a cost of 20
if your emails aren't resolving to your 10 cost DNS server, for whatever
reason, it will try to your 20 DNS server and then fail.
msmex02
Title: Message
I concur with William... NIMDA can't
always be cleaned despite what the commercial companies tell us. We had a
similar problem and it was NIMDA that had infected several DLL's and each
attempt to clean would allow it to move from DLL to DLL which it what it does.
So it can
Title: Message
Anyone know of a good(read:100%
reliable) 3rd party product for resource bookings?
Environment - Exchange 5.5 SP4
running on WIN2K SP2
I tried the auto-accept script and it's
not as robust as we need (short of programming it in). We're currently using
SLIPSTICK .. but
://66.92.148.177
Brian
From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 11:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How Many Exchange Admins Does It Take
http://www.sytel.com/services/benchmark_tco.asp
http://www.sytel.com/services/benchmark_tco.asp
Title: Message
http://www.sytel.com/services/benchmark_tco.asp
This
is an EXCHANGE/NOTES comparison. About half way down the page under the heading
"General Staffing" you'll find your answer. Looks like 882 is the number but
I've seen higher user numbers.This isgood
chart of Exchange costs
Title: Message
Hey Kevin, Just wondering if you on the WETLEATHER M/C alias..
very good alias for M/C heads. It's mostly NW folks.. but there are many from
across the U.S. who participate.
Check out: www.wetleather.com if interested.
-Rick 2002 GL1800 BarcoRocket
Other question - Why does
Title: RE: Lost Attachments
I would also verify, via MESSAGE TRACKING, that they did send the attachments and it left your system via Exchange but didn't arrive with attachments to Recipient1. This proves that Exchange is working correctly/consistently but the remote system is not.
In my
Title: RE: Calendar problems
One word - Outlook 98
Or is that 2 words? Or is that one word and 2 numbers?
Bah!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Calendar problems
Title: RE: Need suggestions for securing OWA
I would recommend SECUREIIS from eEye.com. Cost about $800 per IIS server.
It's an excellent product and blocks at least everything I've seen thrown at it and there's no .DAT or database files that need constant monitoring or downloading. It
Title: Message
see
second email from Mjohnston on this point.
-Original Message-From: Ulm, Jeff
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002
11:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking
for advice re HR Luser request
This may help them
manage their
Title: Message
Any
firmware upgrade is a "potential" for data loss.. anyone that tells you
otherwise hasn't been an Admin long or has just been plain lucky.
Before making ANY server related changes:
In a
word - BACKUP, BACKUP, BACKUP
If you
have any problems, rollback the
Title: Message
probably TS... hehehe
-Original Message-From: David N Precht
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:52
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Help port 25
closed
What
does TS on their side say ?
-Original Message-From: Benjamin
Title: RE: 553 Error message
Does it do that if you just send to the SMTP address only?
i.e. don't use the outlook expanded friendly name P1/P2 names.
If it does send without a failed acknowledgement then either the resolved friendly name is bad to the remote system and you can change it on
Title: RE: Fax solution for E2K and Exchange 5.5
I concur with Dennis... For an enterprise solution it has some nice features. We even went with 800 numbers for all our users.. It was actually cheaper than a Bridged/Routed solution using Rightfax servers/brooktrout cards and the WAN. But I
Title: RE: Fax solution for E2K and Exchange 5.5
Check out 8.0... Very nice.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Fax solution for E2K and Exchange 5.5
My first
Title: Message
If you
have corruption in the store.. EXMERGE might fail on several mailboxes depending
on where the corruption is.
I have
experienced this myself and the store would not move 3 mailboxes(out of
250)due to internal corruption. I had to save those out individually(.PST)
and
Title: RE: Looking for advice re HR Luser request
Rules
Find out what keywords(job description,etc..) they need routed to which person(s) and then set the rule(s) accordingly.
I'm assuming this isn't a custom recipient. If it is, you'd have to create a mailbox and use OL2K to setup the
Title: Message
Also
keep the logic of "you never want an inbound fax to be busy". Outbounds can be
backlogged as most software packages deal with that no problem.
With our load we went with the Brooktrout T-1 cards. It's great, you can
plug your T-1 directly into it and configure the
Title: RE: Does anyone know
Hi All,
Please.. Please.. Please.. Don't use Outlook 98, it is so bug ridden it's not funny. If you can't run Outlook 2K, then use the Outlook that comes with Exchange 5.0. Your going to have nothing but constant problem(s) with Outlook 98. Maybe not immediately..
to Office 2000, and we had absolutely no problems at all.
Murray
-Original Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Does anyone know
Hi All,
Please.. Please.. Please.. Don't use Outlook 98
Title: Message
off
with there heads...
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002
1:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Workgorup
Vs. Domain
What
does the NT newsgroup think?
-Original Message-From:
Title: Message
almost
like it was designed to do it that way... doh!!
-Original Message-From: Matt Moore
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002
2:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Workgorup
Vs. Domain
work group = no authentication. you could do
Title: Message
Definitely sounds NOS related to me. Try re-applying SPx for your NOS and
see if that changes anything. Sounds like something got horked (official admin
phrase) at initial install. If you're getting API failures, the DLL(s) causing
the problem might continue to degrade until
Title: Message
anyone
seen this??
http://www.adomo.com/demo.htm
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:54
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
voicemail
Or
Captaris's CallxpressNT for company wide
Title: RE: What is the best methode of backing up Mailboxes?
Then go out and buy a real backup solution, like Veritas Backup Exec or some other brand so long as CA doesn't have ownership of the product.
Opps.. Don't want to start that debate again.. Never mind.. Keep using ArcServe it will
Title: Message
I've
seen this before. It's usually NOS service pack related. Try re-applying SP4 of
Exchange and see if that fixes it. I bet it broke after installing
WIN2KSP2. I'm not sure what causes it.. something on the IIS side gets
whacked and the Exchange WEB side loses some
Title: RE: Name Resolution problem
Sounds like user permission(s) got revoked in a group, or account that manages Exchange.
Are you saying that the archiving product caused this? What product is it? I don't see how they would be related..
-Rick
As the late Groucho Marx used to say:
East
Title: RE: Name Resolution problem
Hmmm.. Then it sounds, to me, like the product(out of the box) sets itself to this state. Did you install it the service account Exchange or as yourself? Assuming they have different levels of permission.
I know that in my testing with other Exchange add-on
Title: RE: Attachments Disappearing
Settings on the external address in there contact list or Address Book is set wrong. They have set something in there Address book entry for the SMTP settings for encoding or format of the message/attachment. Check the settings between the 2 clients you
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 IE?
We forgot to mention Roger that silence on this alias means, YES, It's okay. wink
-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IE?
My
, that was the problem. Thanks for the
help!
Murray
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:47
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Attachments
Disappearing
Settings on the external address in there contact list
Title: RE: Old Exchange Data Recovery
In the immortals words of Homer Simpson... DOH
-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Old Exchange Data Recovery
Server name, etc
Title: RE: Inbound Message Failure on IMC
RE-apply Exchange SP(I'm assuming NT 4.0 sp6a was last). See if change. If none, Try running the Exchange Optimizer (in -v mode) and look for whitepaper that explains IMS thread settings to optimize is for an IMS server.
If no change:
Next try to
Title: RE: Public Folders Gone!
It could mean that the DATA for the folder is homed on another server and the data isn't being replicated to your server. Check properties on the PF in Exchange Admin at the top of the tree. It should show where it's homed.
I've Also seen this occur because
Title: RE: Public Folders Gone!
So what about part 2 of my options?
Who's the owner of the folder?? I bet it's an Outlook client that created it.
Unless of course your PUB.EDB is corrupt.. But that's not too likely.
-Rick
-Original Message-
From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL
be
helpful.
ellery july phone - 651-225-3895
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:55
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OT:Any Experience
with
NEMX Powertools for Exchange?
I've downloaded there Anti-Spam
Title: Message
Definitely read "How to Remove theFirst Exchange Server in a site"
Qarticle:Q152959 as Ellery states below. You have much more than just
mailboxes associated to the first server in a site. It holds the CALENDAR info
thatis synced when you bring up outlook, it holds most/all of
Title: Message
I also
recommend a product call SECUREIIS made by www.eEye.comcost about$800 per IIS
server.
It
wraps itself around IIS and protects it against almost every hack known. It's
very good product. Itstopped NIMDA before there was even a virus dat
available for it.
-Rick
Title: Message
direct
from Technet:
PSS ID Number: Q294779
Article last modified on 10-17-2001
:
==
Title: RE: Replication
Dennis is 100% correct and because of the way Exchange engrains itself into NT, you are better off wiping the server and starting over. Just select the OWA portion when Exchange setup runs. Make sure it finds the IIS directory location. Recommend D$ as default path and
Title: RE: outgoing mail
True...true..
ACI, I'm with everyone else.. You have a DNS problem. NO DNS, NO outbound email.
Do you have your ISP's IP address listed in your Exchange DNS settings? How do desktops use DNS? If your unsure, find a server in your domain(preferably a PDC, BDC) and
Title: RE: OWA 5.5 has just stopped and i can't start it again!
Yep.. Bob hit it on the mark(or Bob).. that's your issue.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Fronk (BTR Technologies, Inc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Title: RE: Clustering Exchange
For 5.5 I say NIYET - Is it doable but you gain no real advantages in doing it, as 5.5 isn't truly cluster aware.
For XCHG2000 I say DAH - IF you have a solid cluster solution with known HCL Server hardware. I recommend Compaq's cluster solutions as I have the
Hi Gang,
I'm looking for a solid/good
Exchange Solution for SPAM blocking. Also any WEB sites you would use to find
such products would be good. If this body's opinion is that I should go
to a LINUX based solution, like SPAM assassin, I will.. but I'm trying to
stick with a single
Title: RE: Exchange setup question
Sure... as long as the Exchange server isn't a BDC, or PDC.
Exchange(5.x) doesn't really care about domains so long as the server isn't a participant in that role(i.e. PDC, BDC). Make sure you get all your service accounts changed over to the new domain, as
Title: RE: Message sitting in the MTA queue for hours...
There is absolutely a timeout value.. it's listed in your EXCHNAGE ADMIN MTA properties. OPTIMIZER also can change values.
-Rick
-Original Message-
From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002
Title: RE: An odd, but quick, question on Exchange 2k /forestprep
*should* be okay since your not updating to anything new/different... only think I could think of is if you used a box that had a different SP(read:lesser SP) than the original, or current servers are running on and that
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions
100% agree with Mr. William..
I also recommend a product for IIS called SECUREIIS by eEye.com. It works very well with IIS 4.0/5.0 and protects against virtually any DOS/Hack attacks. Costs about $800 per server, and very reasonable for what it
2002 1:46
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ, OWA and
Exchange 5.5 questions
o you could just use URLScan and IISLockdown from
Microsoft for nothing.. :)
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002
0
Title: RE: IMS hung up again...
Possibly check your backup schedules in relationship to your Maintenance Schedule. I had this problem before and it turned out that backups were kicking off at the same as my IMS's Maintenance Schedule. As soon as I changed that around it stopped happening.
Title: RE: Antivirus add-ons for Exchange 5.5 - trends/nav
WE fought the same battle here.. We couldn't justify using 2 different solutions. Symantec has upped there AV support response and updates, so we went to NAV for Exchange. We also use NAV for Internet Mail Gateways - Exchange. It
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Event ID 1160
What kind of hardware(Server brand, CPU, # of CPU's). Is it in the HCL for WIN2K. When I've seen this in the past it generally a result of I/O threads being maxed out or to many locks open at once. Then the JET DB times out in some cases as it stops
8:36
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Antivirus
add-ons for Exchange 5.5 - trends/nav
I second that ... Norton covers all the bases for
me and they have been very responsive to the issues I have had.
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Ward - HQ
To: MS-Exchange Admin
? Or is there another utility? I have not run it with the -v
switch but I plan to try and run it again tonight so I can try that if I need
to.
Thread
settings for IMS? Where do I find this?
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10
Title: RE: OWA on Exchange
5.5 OWA works great under WIN2K IIS 5.0
5.5 also works very well under WIN2K SP2(W/FRS HOTFIX).. Frankly I think it's the most stable platform available for Exchange email.
But I know William would disagree... ;)
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez
!
Why
won't it install on my VALinux box?
Exchange2000 on Windows2000 in a Windows.Net forest
runs awesome!
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:51
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA on
Exchange
5.5 OWA works
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Duplicate Messages
Email should always be left on the server for the Exchange Side.. Having them D/L all messages locally is bad juju.
-Original Message-
From: John Morin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:07 AM
To:
Title: RE: OWA on Exchange
No lack of opinions on this alias (pointing finger at self)
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange
Perfect, perfect,
been well received.
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:08
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
SP4 Duplicate Messages
Email should always be left on the server for the Exchange
Side.. Having
Title: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
Additionally,
IF you are indeed looking for an alternate to Exchange (why I don't know) then consider GROUPWISE. It's higher in collaborative integration than Exchange 5.5 and 2000.. To MS's credit they are catching up to it faster than the old
Title: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
Try waiting until the next version of Exchange.. It will be fully integrated with SQL2Kxx as Exchange and WIN2Kxx will rely on it for ALL the DB level work. Imagine using a DB engine that works consistently for it to manage all records without the
field
that needs to be added to the target csv.
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Ward - HQ
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 5:48
PM
Subject: RE: exporting gal
Start ADMIN in RAW mode (-r) and look at the Raw
ty level to me. Not to mention administration is
a LOT different and to retrain all 8 of our Admins(who are already Exchange
weak)would have been more to deal with as well. Of course that's my
problem.
-Rick
-----Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday
e-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:21
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OT -
Domino/Notes Versus Exchange
See
below
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,
Title: RE: Strange
OST?
If they have offline stores on there desktops.. Delete them and let Exchange re-create.
-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Strange
NT4 SP6a/5.5
2k on it. No ost's to be found.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange
OST?
If they have offline stores on there desktops.. Delete them and let Exchange re-create
Title: RE: exporting gal
Start ADMIN in RAW mode (-r) and look at the Raw properties of the Email Address screen. The headers you need should show up there. Just add that to the top(header row) of your source spreadsheet .CSV file you're using to export the data with.
-Original
Title: Office XP - Outlook 2002 and your Desktop Fax solution
Just an FYI.
Be aware that if you rely on CONTACTS for your desktop faxing solution that your users may experience problems selecting the name of the contact as they are both displayed exactly the same in the Address Book view of
Title: RE: Connection to Active Directory through Access 2000
Correct.. We also went to the next step and added an ODBC link and created an SQL 7.0 DB that manages all of our FAX numbers(our users have fax numbers in the GAL). This allows us to add/remove as users come in/out of the system in
Title: RE: PROBLEM WITH RULES WIZARD
Also Outlook 2002 has much more enhanced rules. They are much more selective, smarter and have more functionality.
You don't say what version your using.. But from your email I suspect OLK 2000 or earlier.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics,
Title: RE: Mail Essentials
Sounds like DNS not resolving.. Did the name change on the server? Is DNS updated to reflect that?
Do/Did you have LMHOST or HOSTS file?
-Rick
-Original Message-
From: Tim Gilroy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:27 PM
To:
Title: Message
yep..
VAPI is broko.. the latest version of NAV is "suppose" to have this corrected.
But I trust keeping it to MAPI only.
-Original Message-From: Todd White
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001
2:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
virii. You have an outbreak in the
office, and its all over.
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 3:07
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Synch errors
in Exchange 5.5 SP4
yep.. VAPI is broko.. the latest
behind it and not pass them until scanned.
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 3:34
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Synch errors
in Exchange 5.5 SP4
wahhhtchhu takin bout Willis...
-Original
Title: RE: GAL sorting
I use separate containers items for such things, which doesn't help your problem.. But on items that are non-people related, like FAX numbers, Pager Number, etc.. I use specific naming context related to that item.
For instance on Pagers I use a P in front of there
I was not aware I was!
I am using just ORT
Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 November 2001 06:03:PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Event
Title: Message
Sounds
like a DNS(routing) issue... Is your domain registered? Is it responding? If
your traveling, in a car,at the speed of light and you turn on your
headlights, what happens? Ohh.. sorry ... William already did
that...
-Rick
-Original Message-From: Don Ely
Title: RE: Event Id 3038 - Off Topic
Simon,
I was just curious as to why you keep sending emails in plain text and as an HTML attachment?
-Original Message-
From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Title: RE: Server causing Outlook to periodically crash
Also try taking a look at your 5 FSMO roles and see if you've overloaded that system(assuming all roles are on 1 server). Perhaps some of the roles may need to be broken out. Like GC. There are many white papers on this topic on TechNet
Title: Re: e-mail problem
I think this was suppose to go to you directly..
And he and/or she is correct... Something in the domain doesn't know it exists. The name of the server should exist in:
WINS
DNS(DDNS if WIN2K)
LMHOST(or HOSTS) file -if used
MX
Check and verify this is true and
Title: RE: Antigen problems
Hi Laura,
I can't help you(NAV punk).. but there are many ANTIGEN experts online.. they maybe able to assist..
-Rick
-Original Message-
From: Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 7:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
a
tough one
HCL.. It's still a DEL Why didn't
you buy a good server like a Compaq an HP or an IBM. Surprised you'd
stoop so low.
Matt
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Ward - HQ
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:
Title: RE: Computer Associates
That's it Bill... your off the CA XMAS list... ;)
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Computer Associates
CA contacted me, concerned
one
What are your Directory Replication scheduled times like?
-Original Message-
From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 2 November 2001 13:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: I got a tough one
So here's a tough one for everyone...
Specs:
WIN2K(Advanced
Title: Message
Sorry
William..
-Original Message-From: Don Ely
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:51
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Computer
Associates
It's
William for those who don't know
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward
t,at least use a bit of wit. If you have any.
m
- Original Message -----
From:
Rick Ward - HQ
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:18
PM
Subject: RE: Still out of Disk
space
Does
the term HCL have any meaning??
-Original Me
Title: RE: Computer Associates
Ahhh... The Power of Cheese
Pfttt.
LMAO
-Original Message-
From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Computer Associates
In the past it has not been
(404) 239 - 2981
Reduce your stress; Resign as the
General Manager of the Universe
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Ward - HQ
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:49
PM
Subject: I got a tough one
So
dress book? This
person could need to re-download their OAB files with Full
Details.
Peter
Dahl.
-Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:47
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I got a tough
one
Eve
Title: RE: Computer Associates
got one too...
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Computer Associates
Friggin' POP connectors!
-Original Message-
If
you're running Compaq with Smart Array Controllers you can "expand" the array
using the Array Utility by adding another physical drive and assigning it to
your main IS drive partition..
reboot
NT, it'll CHKDSKand then REBOOT again and it should see the increased
space and run happily.
Title: Message
What
about RightFax 8.0??
Very
Exchange Integrated. We've been using it since 7.0.. it even had better features
than Faxination back then.
-Rick
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:52
AMTo:
Title: OWA on IIS 5.0 (win2k domain member)
Also
to be sure you use the Service account you have Exchange running under to
install OWA... saves you many headaches later.
-Original Message-From: Zamanian, Behzad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:37
PMTo:
Does
the term HCL have any meaning??
-Original Message-From: Matt Moore
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001
3:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Still out
of Disk space
Just got back and thanks to everybody who
answered. It's on a 16 gig drive
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
