On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Marc Sherman wrote:
You should set the VERP return path in your verp_outbound_router using
errors_to, instead of using return_path on the verp_smtp transport.
Philip, should the docs in chapter 44.3 be changed to suggest this?
Noted to think about next time the docs are
Philip Hazel wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Marc Sherman wrote:
You should set the VERP return path in your verp_outbound_router
using errors_to, instead of using return_path on the verp_smtp
transport.
Philip, should the docs in chapter 44.3 be changed to suggest this?
Noted to think about
Kenevel wrote:
Is there a way of avoiding having to maintain identical code in two
different places?
I have only errors_to set in my VERP router. You only need return_path in
the transport if you want to override errors_to. The errors_to address is
saved in $return_path, btw.
--
## List
Kenevel wrote:
Is there a way of avoiding having to maintain identical code in two
different places?
A macro.
- Jeremy
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Kenevel wrote:
Is there a way of avoiding having to maintain identical code in two
different places?
I have only errors_to set in my VERP router. You only need
return_path in the transport if you want to override errors_to. The
errors_to address is saved in
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Kenevel wrote:
Following on from this, surely the VERP section in the documentation needs
revisiting if setting return_path is redundant?
I have not followed the details of this thread, but, for a message
delivered over SMTP, you can change the return path *either* by an
Steve Cox wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up an archiving system that will store any email entering or
leaving the local network.
Any 'forward all mail' options in the existing mail servers/relays do
just that forward a copy to another mailbox - so all envelope details
are lost. I want to be
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:58:45 -0500 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: [exim] Spam gets through
I apologise in advance if I'm not posting to the right list. I
do so because I strongly suspect that this list members have
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of W B Hacker
Sent: 03 February 2006 14:58
To: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: Re: [exim] Multiple smarthosts and archiving all emails
Steve Cox wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up an archiving system
azzouz wrote:
W B Hacker wrote:
azzouz wrote:
hi,
I want to store aliases informations in ldap in order to view then
from a client mail and eventualy to modify then. Is it possible ?
Some have done it ?
*trim*
Could you give me some exemple concerning aliases management ?
Works
I had a message that took around 19 hours to actually get delivered. Anyone
have any ideas why? Here's the intitial log entry when it was recieved:
Feb 2 07:45:20 sys16 exim[30853]: 2006-02-02 07:45:20 1F4dpu-00081d-2h =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] U=testuser P=local S=6343
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feb 2
Edward Raymond Kryda wrote:
I had a message that took around 19 hours to actually get delivered.
Anyone have any ideas why? Here's the intitial log entry when it was
recieved:
Feb 2 07:45:20 sys16 exim[30853]: 2006-02-02 07:45:20 1F4dpu-00081d-2h
= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=testuser P=local
What I'd like to do is make it so that Exim tries 'normal'
delivery, and
if that fails, then automatically route the same message through
Outbound.
... why this cannot work reliably.
And Exim cannot do it (AFAIK).
I don't see why it can't do it? If Exim tries to connect directly, then
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for an advice how to handle bounced messages to non-existent
users in my domain. I reckon, spammer fake sender of their mail to be some
non-existent user in my domain, izoard.com (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I
get a frozen mail on my
Daevid Vincent wrote:
And Exim cannot do it (AFAIK).
I don't see why it can't do it? If Exim tries to connect directly, then it
First, because Exim is not programmed to do it. A permanent error means
the message is not deliverable.
Second, if the message gets discarded at the receiving site,
15 matches
Mail list logo
