On 08/04/06, Daniel Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:23:17AM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
The problem is at the gmail end so you'll have to ask them what's going on.
Is this a known problem? I would think that if every exim user is getting all
their mail to gmail
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:11:25AM +0100, Peter Bowyer wrote:
Based on my searching so far it looks like emailing gmail support would be a
complete waste of my time. Other posters on other lists who are more
important than me (ISP admins and so on) have reported they were completely
Hello,
I've written a local_scan function for exim-4.61 in which I'm trying to
test sender_address. The manual says:
*uschar *sender_address*
The envelope sender address. For bounce messages this is the empty
string.
local_scan.c:
#define ISNULL(s) (s == NULL || *s == '\0')
[snip]
Quoting Tony Finch:
it won't hurt and it will tell the clueful ones that the spam is not sent by
It will hurt: you will no longer be able to email a significant proportion
of the users at many sites.
In theory, maybe, but you'll get notified (as long as nobody's
blackholing). In pratice, I
Hello,
I've written a local_scan function for exim-4.61 in which I'm trying to
test sender_address. The manual says:
*uschar *sender_address*
The envelope sender address. For bounce messages this is the empty
string.
local_scan.c:
#define ISNULL(s) (s == NULL || *s == '\0')
Daniel Webb wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:23:17AM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
The problem is at the gmail end so you'll have to ask them what's going on.
Is this a known problem? I would think that if every exim user is getting all
their mail to gmail bouncing I wouldn't be the only one
Marc Perkel wrote:
Working on load reduction tricks and increased spam rejection. It's sort
of a greylisting trick for TLDs that tend to be mostly all spam. The
idea being that the initial defer will get rid of a lot of spam that
never retries after one defer where real email will retry and
It's possible have the trusted_users stored in a file?
Thanks
alex
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
Alexandre Busquets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's possible have the trusted_users stored in a file?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /tmp/trusted
ametzler : staff : games
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/sbin/exim4 -bP | grep trusted_g
trusted_groups = ametzler:staff:games
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep
Alexandre == Alexandre Busquets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alexandre It's possible have the trusted_users stored in a file?
Why on earth would you want to?
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details
Hello,
is it possible to do matching for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
I would like all mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] go to one mailbox,
and all mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to another (so I can't use
catch all).
I try partial matching, but Exim said :
partial is not permitted for lookup type lsearch@
But
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
I would like all mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] go to one mailbox,
and all mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to another (so I can't use
catch all).
Why not use local_part_prefix?
Tony.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dotat.at/
On 4/7/06 5:17 PM, Daniel Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is at the gmail end so you'll have to ask them what's going on.
Is this a known problem? I would think that if every exim user is getting all
their mail to gmail bouncing I wouldn't be the only one reporting it (and yes
I
On Friday 07 April 2006 14:27, Philip Hazel wrote:
The paragraph above the one I quoted repeats that information. I suppose
I should insert amongst other things at an appropriate point in the
above para, which is just overview rather than full spec.
[ I don't really want to put see the full
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:33:27PM -0700, John W. Baxter wrote:
As with several others, our sends to Gmail go fine. (Both from our general
outgoing mail servers and from our mailing list server.)
I figured out how to make it not happen:
I had the MTU for my mail server set to 1500 while the
15 matches
Mail list logo