Re: [exim] SMTP timeout sending mail to gmail

2006-04-08 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 08/04/06, Daniel Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:23:17AM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: The problem is at the gmail end so you'll have to ask them what's going on. Is this a known problem? I would think that if every exim user is getting all their mail to gmail

Re: [exim] SMTP timeout sending mail to gmail

2006-04-08 Thread Avleen Vig
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:11:25AM +0100, Peter Bowyer wrote: Based on my searching so far it looks like emailing gmail support would be a complete waste of my time. Other posters on other lists who are more important than me (ISP admins and so on) have reported they were completely

[exim] Signal 11 in local_scan()

2006-04-08 Thread Jack Bailey
Hello, I've written a local_scan function for exim-4.61 in which I'm trying to test sender_address. The manual says: *uschar *sender_address* The envelope sender address. For bounce messages this is the empty string. local_scan.c: #define ISNULL(s) (s == NULL || *s == '\0') [snip]

Re: [exim] What are the options?

2006-04-08 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Quoting Tony Finch: it won't hurt and it will tell the clueful ones that the spam is not sent by It will hurt: you will no longer be able to email a significant proportion of the users at many sites. In theory, maybe, but you'll get notified (as long as nobody's blackholing). In pratice, I

Re: [exim] Signal 11 in local_scan()

2006-04-08 Thread Jack Bailey
Hello, I've written a local_scan function for exim-4.61 in which I'm trying to test sender_address. The manual says: *uschar *sender_address* The envelope sender address. For bounce messages this is the empty string. local_scan.c: #define ISNULL(s) (s == NULL || *s == '\0')

Re: [exim] SMTP timeout sending mail to gmail

2006-04-08 Thread Oliver Heesakkers
Daniel Webb wrote: On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:23:17AM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: The problem is at the gmail end so you'll have to ask them what's going on. Is this a known problem? I would think that if every exim user is getting all their mail to gmail bouncing I wouldn't be the only one

Re: [exim] Load Reduction Trick

2006-04-08 Thread W B Hacker
Marc Perkel wrote: Working on load reduction tricks and increased spam rejection. It's sort of a greylisting trick for TLDs that tend to be mostly all spam. The idea being that the initial defer will get rid of a lot of spam that never retries after one defer where real email will retry and

[exim] trusted_users

2006-04-08 Thread Alexandre Busquets
It's possible have the trusted_users stored in a file? Thanks alex -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

[exim] Re: trusted_users

2006-04-08 Thread Andreas Metzler
Alexandre Busquets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's possible have the trusted_users stored in a file? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /tmp/trusted ametzler : staff : games [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/sbin/exim4 -bP | grep trusted_g trusted_groups = ametzler:staff:games [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep

Re: [exim] trusted_users

2006-04-08 Thread Andrew - Supernews
Alexandre == Alexandre Busquets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Alexandre It's possible have the trusted_users stored in a file? Why on earth would you want to? -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details

[exim] Partial matching for [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-04-08 Thread Olivier Bonvalet
Hello, is it possible to do matching for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? I would like all mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] go to one mailbox, and all mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to another (so I can't use catch all). I try partial matching, but Exim said : partial is not permitted for lookup type lsearch@ But

Re: [exim] Partial matching for [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-04-08 Thread Tony Finch
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: I would like all mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] go to one mailbox, and all mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to another (so I can't use catch all). Why not use local_part_prefix? Tony. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dotat.at/

Re: [exim] SMTP timeout sending mail to gmail

2006-04-08 Thread John W. Baxter
On 4/7/06 5:17 PM, Daniel Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is at the gmail end so you'll have to ask them what's going on. Is this a known problem? I would think that if every exim user is getting all their mail to gmail bouncing I wouldn't be the only one reporting it (and yes I

Re: [exim] Where to rate limit appropriately to keep system load under control

2006-04-08 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
On Friday 07 April 2006 14:27, Philip Hazel wrote: The paragraph above the one I quoted repeats that information. I suppose I should insert amongst other things at an appropriate point in the above para, which is just overview rather than full spec. [ I don't really want to put see the full

Re: [exim] SMTP timeout sending mail to gmail

2006-04-08 Thread Daniel Webb
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:33:27PM -0700, John W. Baxter wrote: As with several others, our sends to Gmail go fine. (Both from our general outgoing mail servers and from our mailing list server.) I figured out how to make it not happen: I had the MTU for my mail server set to 1500 while the