Marc Perkel wrote:
For what it's worth I to would like to have a feature to choose to
ignore 550 errors and do something other that bounce the message. There
are times when you are sure that the 550 was in error and you wat to
take a different action. I run into that myself.
The 550
Hi Guys
Not sure where the problem might be exactly, but here is the scenario. We have
a Postfix, MailScanner server that filters mail and passes it onto an Exim
server for local delivery.
On the Postfix server, as soon as a mail comes in with multiple recipients (10
or more) it just hangs in
On 2007-09-21 at 00:01 +0200, Peter Thomassen wrote:
I have set up an additional router that determines the target mailbox by
looking up an alias file using lsearch*.
Unfortunately, the recipients that are being routed to a particular user
(root!) are finally also routed to peter, obviously
I'm getting a relay not permitted error on RCPT of a mail message I
send from my workstation to a foreign destination via my exim 4.68
server.
The mail is catching on the section in exim.conf:
--
require message = relay not permitted
domains = +local_domains : +relay_domains
--
On 20/09/2007, Darren Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting a relay not permitted error on RCPT of a mail message I
send from my workstation to a foreign destination via my exim 4.68
server.
The mail is catching on the section in exim.conf:
--
require message = relay not permitted
Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2007-09-21 at 00:01 +0200, Peter Thomassen wrote:
The question now is: How do I define a catch-rest wildcard that does
not affect any recipients that are processed otherwise?
Since that's what lsearch* is supposed to be, something else is
happening in your
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Peter Thomassen wrote:
The output of `exim -bt postmaster` shows that Exim recursively tries to
lookup for an alias (have a look at the comments I put in)
If you don't want that to happen, check out the repeat_use option of the
redirect router.
--
Philip Hazel
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:42:57 +0200, Renaud Allard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
By taking a life analogy, you should not kill your customer because he forgot
to
pay his bill, but you should tell him to pay his bill.
Yes, and fixing this in exim temporarily is the equivalent of offering
payment by
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:09:12 +0200, Renaud Allard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Marc Haber wrote:
While this is being sorted out with the proxy vendor, can I make exim
treat the 550 as a temporary error? Maybe only this particular 550?
You should probably better contact the firewall vendor to
Marc Haber wrote:
While this is being sorted out with the proxy vendor, can I make exim
treat the 550 as a temporary error? Maybe only this particular 550?
You should probably better contact the firewall vendor to request a fix
to _their_ problem.
Which part of while this is being sorted
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Marc Haber wrote:
What I'd like to have is a temporary fix. This would also prove to the
client that open source is far superior to closed source.
It is. You have the source. You can add, or pay someone else to add, any
modifications that you like. You can't do that with
--On 13 September 2007 11:57:50 -0600 Luis Fernando Gramajo P.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody!!
Im trying to setup exim4 on debian etch to work only as a smtp filter,
and relay everything to the main MTA.
I think the relay thing is working, on every mail I get this message on
--On 17 September 2007 00:05:10 +0100 Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Jeremy Harris wrote:
Um, the default key is $sender_host_address - but you can pick a
different one, to match your definition of host, no?
Yeah, but even if you try to use the destination host
Philip Hazel wrote:
What I'd like to have is a temporary fix. This would also prove to the
client that open source is far superior to closed source.
It is. You have the source. You can add, or pay someone else to add, any
modifications that you like. You can't do that with closed source.
--On 17 September 2007 09:00:05 +0100 Peter Bowyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Better rethink your use of SPF. The simple fact of an SPF PASS,
whether or not the domain publishes +all, doesn't indicate anything
about the spamminess of a message. All it does is confirm that the
message came
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Ian Eiloart wrote:
It might listen on a second IP address, or a non-standard port (assuming Exim
can send email to a host listening on a non-standard port?).
The manualroute router allows you to specify the port, as does the smtp
transport.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch [EMAIL
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Gabriel Marais wrote:
On the Postfix server, as soon as a mail comes in with multiple
recipients (10 or more) it just hangs in the queue.
Assuming that you haven't broken Postfix in the way that ABN AMRO did, I
expect that your Exim is taking too long over recipient
Marc Haber wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:09:12 +0200, Renaud Allard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Marc Haber wrote:
While this is being sorted out with the proxy vendor, can I make exim
treat the 550 as a temporary error? Maybe only this particular 550?
You should probably better contact the
Mike Cardwell wrote:
Marc Haber wrote:
While this is being sorted out with the proxy vendor, can I make exim
treat the 550 as a temporary error? Maybe only this particular 550?
You should probably better contact the firewall vendor to request a fix
to _their_ problem.
Which part of
On 2007-09-21 at 09:56 +0200, Peter Thomassen wrote:
The output of `exim -bt postmaster` shows that Exim recursively tries to
lookup for an alias (have a look at the comments I put in) and finally
finds *:peter, regardless of the fact that root is a Linux user account and
not an alias:
Each
Hi Phil,
thank you for your clarification of the routing things ... it's just like it
is with most things: When understood, you realize how simple it is. I think
I'm now able to write a sophisticated routing configuration ;-)
Greetings from Germany,
Peter
--
## List details at
Marc Haber wrote:
Which part of while this is being sorted out with the proxy vendor
did you not understand?
Marc, I have the greatest respect for your contributions to this list,
and to the exim project.
That said, this is a rocky road you travel. By saying it's okay to
work around this
22 matches
Mail list logo
