Um, I tried finding out the easy way.
Lesson learned.
I'll go back and try first.
Digital hand-slap acknowledged.
Please accept my apologies.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Keith Edmunds
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 1:07 PM
Hi Bill,
I have removed the email addresses in question from the error log as my
client (who is trying to email a Message Labs Client - which happens to be a
HUGE worldwide private bank) would not appreciate their addresses to be
posted everywhere on the internet.
No, I am not a forger trying
On 07/10/2007, Netdynamix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody have any ideas what could be causing these issues with sending
to MessageLab hosted mailboxes? (INCLUDING THEIR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADDRESS)
They have still not responded to my emails sent from my hotmail.com account
(which, as I
Netdynamix wrote:
Hi Bill,
I have removed the email addresses in question from the error log as my
client (who is trying to email a Message Labs Client - which happens to be a
HUGE worldwide private bank) would not appreciate their addresses to be
posted everywhere on the internet.
No,
Netdynamix wrote:
Hi Bill,
I have removed the email addresses in question from the error log as my
client (who is trying to email a Message Labs Client - which happens to be a
HUGE worldwide private bank) would not appreciate their addresses to be
posted everywhere on the internet.
Folks
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 03:37:26 +0100, Andrew - Supernews
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Alltel or whoever think they're trying to achieve with that rDNS
entry is a complete mystery to me, though.
If in doubt, they're trying to confuse people to death.
Greetings
Marc, who has had his logcheck trip
Hi,
Who will be PGP signing future Exim releases please? With which PGP
key?
(And is there a signature by Philip Hazel's key on the new key?)
Thanks,
-Phil
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki
On 8 Oct 2007, at 10:03, Phil Pennock wrote:
Who will be PGP signing future Exim releases please? With which PGP
key?
I have a key I set up for that purpose (a few years back), but never
really did anything with.
(And is there a signature by Philip Hazel's key on the new key?)
I thought
Andrew - Supernews wrote:
Wakko == Wakko Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wakko 2007-10-07 21:17:30 no IP address found for host
Wakko spam.complaints.(888)292-3827.alltel.senior.support.ticket#2-940727661
Wakko (during SMTP connection from [216.96.39.144] I=[removed]:25)
Wakko Has
Trying to get people to fix bad RDNS so I created a wiki page about it.
Feel free to link to it or steal it. I'm sending messages back to the
sending host with this link in it in the hopes that people might read
their log files and find it.
Marc Perkel wrote:
Trying to get people to fix bad RDNS so I created a wiki page about it.
Feel free to link to it or steal it. I'm sending messages back to the
sending host with this link in it in the hopes that people might read
their log files and find it.
Wakko == Wakko Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wakko As it is to me as well, I posted this for comments about the
Wakko name that was returned. I thought that ( ) and # weren't
Wakko allowed in hostnames.
They're not, but they _are_ allowed in DNS labels (pretty much
everything, including
On MondayOct 8, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Trying to get people to fix bad RDNS so I created a wiki page about
it.
Feel free to link to it or steal it. I'm sending messages back to the
sending host with this link in it in the hopes that people might read
their log files and find
Renaud == Renaud Allard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Renaud You should maybe add some info about how the HELO of a
Renaud mailserver should be resolved.
Renaud So the best way would be HELO == A == PTR
HELO == A == PTR is best _only_ if the PTR record value is not generic.
If you control the
Andrew - Supernews wrote:
Renaud == Renaud Allard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Renaud You should maybe add some info about how the HELO of a
Renaud mailserver should be resolved.
Renaud So the best way would be HELO == A == PTR
HELO == A == PTR is best _only_ if the PTR record value
Dear all,
I'm looking at making a copy of exim run on our site firewall,
intercepting all attempts (from outside) to contact port 25 for every
internal host. There are several reasons for doing this. First off, we
don't publish MX records for everything inside Aber, but some people
manage to
Alun wrote:
The firewall is a Linux box and I've told it to redirect port 25
traffic to port 25 on the local host. This works and I can connect in.
What I'm after is a way of determining which IP address the connecting
machine was trying to talk to. $interface_address returns the address
of
I'm not real good at this but I whipped up this little PHP script to
test RDNS.
http://www.junkemailfilter.com/rdns.php
If anyone is interested in improving this I'll post the source and
someone can make it better.
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
##
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm not real good at this but I whipped up this little PHP script to
test RDNS.
http://www.junkemailfilter.com/rdns.php
If anyone is interested in improving this I'll post the source and
someone can make it better.
That's impressive overkill. Most UNIX users will be
Martin A. Brooks wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm not real good at this but I whipped up this little PHP script to
test RDNS.
http://www.junkemailfilter.com/rdns.php
If anyone is interested in improving this I'll post the source and
someone can make it better.
That's impressive
Marc Perkel wrote:
I don't see it as overkill because it verifies that the RDNS matches the
original IP.
You may wish to do some input bounds checking before proceeding with the
lookup. Your script barfs when, amongst others, you add leading or
trailing spaces.
--
Martin A. Brooks |
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:49:46 +0100, Graeme Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 18:19 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Did you read what you quoted? They think their product does not need
fixing as it is working as designed.
And they're correct.
I beg to differ.
...now, back in the
Tom Kistner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alun wrote:
returns the address of the interface the request came in on, but
that's different from the address that was being contacted.
You need to patch Exim to do this. If you use the netfilter (aka
iptables)
Alun [EMAIL PROTECTED] said, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think I'll have a quick play with parsing netstat -an --tcp for
$sender_host_address:$sender_host_port to find who the other end is
trying to talk to. This should be close enough to unique for my
purposes.
Actually, thinking
Marc Haber wrote:
That helped, but we needed to bastardise the site's security policy to
be allowed to put an unprotected system in front of the Firewall. It
would have been easier (and saved at least two person-days in meetings
alone) if the transparent proxy would have better catered
Alun wrote:
I'm looking at making a copy of exim run on our site firewall,
intercepting all attempts (from outside) to contact port 25 for every
internal host. There are several reasons for doing this. First off, we
don't publish MX records for everything inside Aber, but some people
manage
I'm about to convert myself off the old, traditional way of scanning
with SpamAssassin to the new ACL-based technique. The spec and the
wiki are pretty good at describing how to set this up, but things seem
a little light in the how do I configure it department.
Q1: Is it possible to use
WJCarpenter wrote:
I'm about to convert myself off the old, traditional way of scanning
with SpamAssassin to the new ACL-based technique. The spec and the
wiki are pretty good at describing how to set this up, but things seem
a little light in the how do I configure it department.
Q1: Is it
28 matches
Mail list logo
