On 2008-07-16 at 17:26 -0700, Phil Pennock wrote:
Now use:
file = ${extract {mailbox}{$address_data}}
user = ${extract {uid}{$address_data}}
With this, you have one lookup in the Router, used twice (via the
cache); the first validates the address, the second stores it in a
Hi Peter,
The router above the ditch_spam router are given couple of smarthost router
and the one given below.
dnslookup:
driver = dnslookup
domains = ! +local_domains
transport = remote_smtp
ignore_target_hosts = 0.0.0.0 : 127.0.0.0/8
no_more
mailman_router:
driver = accept
Thank you very much for your help with this Phil!
I had a go at using the address_data variable, but it didn't make sense
till I read your note.
I'll keep you apprised of my progress. Have a good day!
Oh, yes, the address verification will be added later, and right now we
are checking the
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Phil Pennock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the DB will be checked once per message in the queue, once per
queue-run.
If you have a one-recipient limit, then you can get around this by using
an $acl_m_foo variable which is stored in the spool file. For the
Ted Cooper wrote on Friday, July 18, 2008 2:03 AM:
Schramm, Dominik wrote:
I decided to check for this in the DATA ACL. It was supposed
as a means of rejecting offending messages at SMTP time anyway.
I just wanted to log the offending portions for some time
before activating it, but I
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:31:04AM +0200, Schramm, Dominik wrote:
There was talk on exim-dev regarding a RFC 2822 date parsing
patch to the exim code.
http://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20080604.133713.1e67dcec.en.html
I can't find any news regarding this since.
This is
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 04:25:32PM -0400, Steve Devine said:
Wondering what others have done.
As part of the setup of the new machine, I temporarily add an acl
statement allowing relay from the old machines. When the new machine is
up and running, I bring down the old machines, and add a new
Steve Devine wrote:
We are going to be upgrading and retiring some mx machines. What I am
wondering is if I create a new machine can I tar up exim/input/* and
move it over to the new machine?
Will the new exim accept these spooled messages as if they were there
own? Maybe theres a better way
Hi
I have strange problem, I wanted to create acl check to defer messages from
local domains but without auth. local_domains are defined as:
domainlist local_domains = ${lookup mysql {SELECT DISTINCT domain FROM user
WHERE domain='${quote_mysql:$domain}' UNION SELECT DISTINCT domain FROM alias
