On 2011-08-23 at 12:41 +0100, De Ranter, Nico wrote:
I'm receiving a large number of spam messages from addresses of the form
name@ip-address. I'm already blocking addresses of the form
@[ip-address] using 'allow_domain_literals=false' but this doesn't seem
to stop @ip-address.
As long as
On 25/08/11 2:36 AM, Oliver Howe ojh...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think I should stop sending bounce backs as long as they are
legitimate (if for example somebody made a typing mistake when composing a
message).
But I do want to stop sending bounce backs to messages that didnt come
from
where
-Original Message-
From: exim-users-boun...@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-boun...@exim.org] On
Behalf Of Craig Whitmore
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 8:32 AM
To: Oliver Howe; exim-users@exim.org
Subject: Re: [exim] listed at .backscatterer.org
A mail server should not accept
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:36:56 +0100 Oliver Howe wrote:
Hi,
One of my mail servers has been listed at backscatterer.org
They say they can remove me for 92 euros or I will be automatically removed
in 4 weeks.
One idea might be to send bounces and only bounces from a different
interface/IP.
Is there an acl which can examine the From: name?
It seems that the term sender refers only to the envelope sender,
but I am unsure if it isn't ambiguous and has different meanings
in different ACLs (acl_smtp_rcpt / acl_smtp_data)
What I am trying to do is reject emails where the sender (spammer
Hi there,
I am trying to create a negation for a host list. If I understand
correctly, multiple items on a line are ³OR² together.
Hosts = !+host_list1 : !+host_list2
If I understand correctly again, I am setting up a resultant NAND function
by negating the two lists that are ³OR² together.
Hi folks,
I am having a little issue which I am struggling to pin down.
Essentially my copy of exim has the followind router and transport:
#Router Begin
static_route:
driver = manualroute
transport = remote_smtp_smart
route_data = ${lookup{$domain}lsearch{/etc/staticroutes}}
Hi Phil,
when I try
exim -bt test@110.1.1.1
I get
R: smarthost for test@110.1.1.1
test@110.1.1.1
router = smarthost, transport = remote_smtp_smarthost
host x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]
(the server is intended as a filter in front of our main mail server)
Thanks
On 2011-08-24 at 10:37 +0100, De Ranter, Nico wrote:
Hi Phil,
when I try
exim -bt test@110.1.1.1
I get
R: smarthost for test@110.1.1.1
test@110.1.1.1
router = smarthost, transport = remote_smtp_smarthost
host x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]
(the server is
On 2011-08-24 at 16:44 +0100, Colin wrote:
2011-08-22 13:18:16 1QvTSJ-hJ-Rx ** sen...@domain1.tld
sen...@domain1.tld R=static_route T=remote_smtp_smart: all hosts have
been failing for a long time and were last tried after this message arrived
Are you sure that it's the sender address
On 2011-08-24 at 19:40 -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote:
Is there an acl which can examine the From: name?
Yes, acl_smtp_data. Remember that the RFC822/2822/5322 headers come in
as part of the message body, after the DATA verb. So in acl_smtp_rcpt,
you haven't yet seen the From: header.
Also, note
On 2011-08-24 at 22:51 -0400, Frank DeChellis wrote:
Hosts = !+host_list1 : !+host_list2
If I understand correctly again, I am setting up a resultant NAND function
by negating the two lists that are ³OR² together. Boolean Algebra 201.
How would I create a ³NOR² function between the two
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 00:50, Frank Elsner frank.els...@tu-berlin.dewrote:
One idea might be to send bounces and only bounces from a different
interface/IP.
This avoids blacklisting of the interface/IP used to send all other
normal mail.
That is a decent way of mitigating the risks, but I
13 matches
Mail list logo
