Hey Guys,
Not directly an exim problem but hoping someone may have already had
the misfortune to have to do what i'm about to do. Due to a glitch,
I have a mail archiving system here that writes each sent and
received message to a file for selected domains (that's a received
and sent
Hi Guys,
Am having a bit of a confusing time with control flow in my
check_content ACL. I'm using the ACL for clam and sophos scanning
however i'm trying to modify it to bail out if a particular header is
present in the message being scanned.
Basically does the ACL return on the first
On 11/08/2006, at 11:37 PM, Gareth Hastings wrote:
If I had a problem with a program that kept segfaulting and I was
calling it in a transport. Would it be possible to somehow setup the
transport to run gdb on the program capturing a backtrace?
Any ideas?
If you enable core dumping (ie.
Hey Guys,
Am having a really bizzare problem here causing us massive grief and
i'm having a hard time trying to replicate/isolate the cause am
hoping you might have a few ideas.
On our primary mail server here i'm noticing major (up to 1-2
minutes) delays on incoming SMTP connections at
Hi Exim Folks,
I'm currently doing some performance tuning on a pretty heavily used
exim server we have here. We're running FreeBSD 6.1 and am noticing
the disk loading to be quite high. The filesystems are currently
configured as UFS however i'm contemplating using tunefs to switch
On 10/07/2006, at 4:10 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a cleaner way to do this - like with a list?
IMHO you'd be much better using spamassassin from the spam ACL.
Cheers,
Marcus
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
On 06/07/2006, at 10:43 PM, Stuart Gall wrote:
IF you enter the parameters as indicated in the clamd part of the
docs then exim seems to use a random port
Exim will use a random (ephemeral) source port for the outgoing
connection, the port specified in the configuration refers to the
port
Hi Guys,
I'm doing some performance tuning for on one of our pretty heavily
loaded servers, i'm wanting to enable the split_spool_directory
directive. Do I need to ensure the current queue/spool is completely
flushed before enabling this? Or, if I switch this option on and
restart, will
Hi Guys,
On 26/06/2006, at 6:51 PM, Philip Hazel wrote:
transport. (Best performance would probably be obtained by writing a
daemon that listens on a socket and have Exim write to the socket.)
I have written a daemonised version of our mail analysis/processing
functions and it has reduced
On 26/06/2006, at 6:51 PM, Philip Hazel wrote:
Here's a kludge. I assume your successful router is routing the
address
to a transport. If so, you can use the fact that the transport
option
is expanded.
Hi Philip, at the moment i'm using a number of routers to achieve a
range of
On 19/06/2006, at 7:22 PM, Cédric MARCOUX (sprimont) wrote:
* Using a new router that redirect to my exchnage but in this way i'm
not sure that the mail is still storage in /var/mail...?
I'd suggest creating an 'archive_router' as the first router in your
config. For instance:
Hi Guys,
Is there any way to write a message to the mainlog from inside a
router? I'm working on an archiving project that archives copies of
all mail for a set of domains - I want to write some details to the
log for every message received before determining whether to save a
copy or
Hi Exim Users,
I'm trying to modify our current content scanning ACL to allow for us
to save/quarantine copies of virally infected email that passes
through our mail servers. We are using both Sophos and Clam to do the
scanning and our current setup scanning ACL's look like this:
---
# Sophos
13 matches
Mail list logo
