Found the solution by using "local_parts":
# driver = manualroute
# senders = import...@example.net
# domains = example.com
# local_parts = foo1: foo2
# transport = remote_smtp
# route_list = * 192.168.178.1
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Exim-users [mailto:exim-users-bounce
Good Morning,
we need to route some mail traffic based on sender AND recipient if that's
possible.
Configuration as of now:
Everything from * to @example.com goes to 10.10.10.10
myrouter:
driver = manualroute
domains = example.com
transport = remote_smtp
route_list = * 10.10.10.10
What we
I'll try using h_subject in bounce_message_file and see if that helps.
Cheers
Marc
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Exim-users [mailto:exim-users-bounces+tt-admin=intranett...@exim.org]
Im Auftrag von Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2022 12:20
An: exim-users
Hi,
is there a way to add the original subject to a bounce e-mail instead of
just "Mail delivery.."?
We already use an exim filter for bounces:
if ("$return_path" is "" and ...
then
headers add "New-Subject: #BOUNCE# $h_subject:"
headers remove subject
headers add "Subject: $h_new-subject:"
Well, seems like the remote site managed to install an update for their
Symantec E-Mail Gateways and since then - the error disappeared. We still
run on Exim v4.90.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Exim-users [mailto:exim-users-bounces+tt-admin=intranett...@exim.org]
Im Auftrag von Andrew
-admin=intranett...@exim.org]
Im Auftrag von Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. März 2022 12:35
An: tt-admin
Cc: exim-users@exim.org
Betreff: Re: [exim] 2 hours delay (gnutls_handshake): timed out: delivering
unencrypted to
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022, tt-admin via Exim-users wrote
o:exim-users-bounces+tt-admin=intranett...@exim.org]
Im Auftrag von Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. März 2022 12:35
An: tt-admin
Cc: exim-users@exim.org
Betreff: Re: [exim] 2 hours delay (gnutls_handshake): timed out: delivering
unencrypted to
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022, tt-admin vi
).
--
Marc
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Exim-users [mailto:exim-users-bounces+tt-admin=intranett...@exim.org]
Im Auftrag von Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. März 2022 19:56
An: exim-users@exim.org
Betreff: Re: [exim] 2 hours delay (gnutls_handshake): timed out: delivering
[1], 4) = 0
6671 alarm(300)= 0
Then the unencrypted smtp connections starts and the mesage is delivered
unencrypted.
Did not have the chance to call exiwhat, will try next time.
--
Cheers,
Marc
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Exim-users [mailto:exim-users-bounces
>I wonder what 1758 and 1762 were doing all that time -
>I presume there is no other mention of 1762 in the log ?
No, they are not mentioned besides the exigrep output.
>If you see any more of these stuck in the queue, can you get an lsof
>and a truss/strace/ltrace of the processes ?
Appreciate
>Does
> exigrep 1nWC1t-0001kn-G2 /var/log/exim4/mainlog-202203*
>(or where ever your exim logs are) show anything for the "other process" ?
I'm afraid not, here you see two logs from yesterday (complete exigrep
output without sensitive information):
2022-03-29 10:02:40.626 [1758]
>So, it might not be that one then. Were there any other
>operations that might have stepped the system's notion
>of time?
No - and the uptime of the server is 325 days, but the problem occurs daily
since 2020-03-04. I just restarted the exim daemon, for what it's worth.
--
Cheers,
Marc
--
post from this list (from July 2017) where you talked to
somebody called Christian Balzer who had the same problem, but there seems
to be no solution as of the last posting.
--
Cheers
Marc
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Exim-users [mailto:exim-users-bounces+tt-admin=intranett...@exim.org
file is locked
(another process is handling this message)
2022-03-21 10:13:04.657 [6774] 1nWC1t-0001kn-G2 TLS session:
(gnutls_handshake): timed out: delivering unencrypted to H=..(not in
hosts_require_tls)
The offending hosts are not controlled by us, but i am in contact with the
admin (Symantec
f "match".)
You would place this in as the in the ${if…} expression,
possibly combining several with "and" or "or" operators as needed.
These, too, are explained in a different section of the same chapter.
Cheers,
Mike Brudenell
On 11 November 2015 at 13:53, Prost
Hi all!
I have two local domains (2 active directory domains (cross truested))
in one local network.
And i have two external domain (valid MX).
for example:
local: domain1.local and domain2.local
external: domain1.external and domain2.external
Need configuration - local domains can cross
(1) The following block of text to the authenticators section in
exim.conf:
plain:
driver = plaintext
public_name = PLAIN
server_prompts = :
server_set_id = $2
server_condition = ${if pam{$2:$3}{1}{0}}
login:
driver = plaintext
public_name = LOGIN
server_prompts = userID:: : password::
Thanks everyone,
What are the external exim commands to relay outbound email messages
to a designated server (i.e., outbound.mailhop.org) over port no. 2525?
Hal
On 2012-10-05 04:00, exim-users-requ...@exim.org wrote:
Send Exim-users mailing list submissions to
Hi all,
How do we set up Exim (Exim 4) to use a remote smtp server (i.e,
AUTH,ROUTERSTART,TRANSPORTSTART)?
Section: AUTH
login:
driver = plaintext
public_name = LOGIN
client_send = : username : password
Section: ROUTERSTART
send_to_smart_host:
driver = manualroute
route_list =
I'm searching for a postupcp script to modify mailman to point to a
specific URL link update after each upcp.
Regards,
Hal
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
Hi, people!
Some MTA's checks To: field for adreess this MTA serving. In case when To:
doesn't contains an address this MTA serving (for example, To: contains an
local alias that points to remote address) message is rejected. I think it is
good idea to replace To: field with list of real
Hello,
I'm hosting provider with directadmin control panel. I'm finding for the
solution to pass all e-mails both incoming and outgoing through proper
address without scanning by ClamAV and SpamAssassin for only one domain,
He wouldn't lost any e-mails I already disabled spamassassin but some
if I use nm -D /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.3 I get
a710 T inflate
= inflate() is present in /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.3
(other symbols also)
So I'd rather assume your setup doesn't try to link libz at all.
Correct, I ran strace with -f and it shows it tries to link to libz.a only.
15912
Hello Michiel,
Yes, that what I mean. They resolve to 1 IP address. Something like
Apache with virtual domains.
Well, you can't use certs/SSL for virtual hosts sharing the same IP
address in Apache either.
That is bc of catch 22 problem: the requested hostname for vhost is
located in HTTP
Hello Darton,
The best way I've found is to fill out as many free offer and other
advertising gimmick forms as you can find on the web. The sketchier
the company, the better. Google something like multi-level marketing
and you're sure to find some.
I found this one to be the most effective,
Hello everyone,
So I have this in ACL DATA:
warn set acl_m_sa = ${run {/etc/domeny/testme $message_exim_id $acl_m_user}
{$value} }
log_message = acl_m_user: $acl_m_user
warn continue = {true}
log_message = Testme result for message $message_id: $acl_m_sa
The script is:
Hello Richard,
We are running SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb running on Perl version
5.8.4 on a Debian Sarge box with exim4.
My experience indicates SA feels much, much better on perl 5.8.8
(upgrading perl is often a tedious experience, though). Anyway, you
should really run some messages
Hello Johann,
* Would it be possible to configure exim to generate a key for a
user on the fly and store it in the database if the user does not
have already one?
You might be able to do this in one of DATA acls with warn acl (that
does nothing for ACL, but might run some
Hello Ted,
Changing the DNSBL verb from deny to drop may cause the bots to attempt
the connection again, but this will depend on the bot. Some of them try
again even with a deny, others try once and never come back again.
OK, so here's a how problem: would it be possible in Exim to first
send
Hello everyone,
I'd like to use extract with keys, as it makes for more readable config
than extract with number/string separator. Sadly, I have trouble to get
former to work with double quotes:
da7 (87.204.147.157) ~ % exim -be
${extract{result}{result=clean reason=spamtrap}}
clean
Hello,
I'm trying to cook up an ACL that would reject mails
considered spam, but that would still give human users a chance to confirm
that they are not spambot (in case of false positive).
So I
have this:
acl_smtp_data = check_message
...
check_message:
...
deny message = Your
message
Hello,
OK, so I found this dlfunc extension:
http://www.ols.es/exim/dlext/
pipe_message works fine, except
this ACL doesn't work as I expected:
deny message
= Your message is considered spam. Please follow link http://${run
hostname -i}/antispam/$message_id if you're human and would like
deny message
= Your message is considered spam. Please follow link http://${run
hostname -i}/antispam/$message_id if you're human and would like to
confirm your message.
Um, can't you use $received_ip_address or something instead of running
an external program to find out your IP address?
550 Administrative prohibition
Got it, except I had to do this weird thing to get it working:
deny message = doesn't really matter
condition = ${dlfunc {/usr/sbin/exim-ext.so} {pipe_message}
{/etc/domeny/testme -u ...} }
message = Your message is considered spam. Please
I want to accept incoming mail using AUTH and TLS - done. But I want to
process this mail first with an external program and then send it out.
How do I create the rule:
- if incoming mail is authenticated, then pipe to this script.
- if someone locally is trying to send mail using
35 matches
Mail list logo