I figured it out now:
I didn't implement the ACL in the data section because I thought it's
useless ;-)
If you follow http://www.exim-users.org/forums/showthread.php?t=51895
one by one, BATV will work flawless.
2007/12/5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Dave,
thanks for your help!
I
Hi all,
I use exim on a shared hosting environment and come across the
following scenario from time to time:
If I set up a new domain and sent out an e-mail after that to exactly
this domain, it is delivered local. But very often this domain is
still on another host and the recipient will never
Hi Keith,
the idea is to send out the e-mail into the wilderness of the internet
instead of write it directly to the local users inbox.
This way the dnslookup will find the old host and delivers it there
instead of local.
It would also prevent domain-hijacking on shared hosting
environments.
A word of warning, vacation messages are sent (by Exim, for example) to
addresses found in headers, not the return-path. BATV will cause these to
fail.
I assume that vacation messages contain a sender. BATV just applies
for mails with an empty sender what is true for bounces only
--
## List
I hope you assume wrong. Imagine the loop of competing vacation
messages when they don't use a null sender ...
argh.. *bangingmyheadonthetable* ;-)
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with
Hi Dave,
thanks for your help!
I tried to debug all different scenarios and was not able to reproduce
the error. I will do some further testing and write back, if I'm gonna
find further details or a solution.
2007/12/4, Dave Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:48:40AM +0100,
generate such errors.
Has anyone out there a clue about this?
Many thanks in advance,
tropfstein
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
