On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:02:41 +0100 (CET), Jakob Hirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rafa wrote:
control. My problem is, that server is configured to return 450 for
invalid mailboxes, causing exim to interpret it as a temporary error.
This is broken, wrong and stupid.
4xx tells other MTAs to retry,
On 2/9/06, Jakob Hirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. Write my own recipient verification program and call it from an ACL
using run or readsocket. I think I'm going to do this anyway as
Which will not work if their server is down, and that's just the time a
backup mx is needed. Except for
Rafa wrote:
control. My problem is, that server is configured to return 450 for
invalid mailboxes, causing exim to interpret it as a temporary error.
This is broken, wrong and stupid.
4xx tells other MTAs to retry, but as they'll never accept that mail,
there is no point in doing so.
1.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Rafa wrote:
220 mail.abcd.com ESMTP Postfix
helo test
250 mail.abcd.com
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 Ok
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
450 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User unknown in local recipient table
data
554 Error: no valid recipients
This causes exim to leave the
Hello, all
I've been using exim for several years now and I'm quite satisfied by
it, since it can pretty much handle any smtp related task I've had
need of.
Recently, tho, I was asked to provide secondary MX for another mail
server that runs Postfix. This server is completely out of my
control.
