--On 23 August 2007 11:55:45 +0100 Dave Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:37:57PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
Not if you're rejecting during the SMTP transaction, which is I think
what was being discussed originally.
Correct, *but the default clamav message saying
Hello,
OK, so as some of you may know, clamav now features filtering out
phishing and/or spam as well.
The problem is this generates rather unreadable reject messages:
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
host mail.da4.promo.pl [83.149.102.11]: 550 Wirus (virus):
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:35:40AM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
Hello,
OK, so as some of you may know, clamav now features filtering out
phishing and/or spam as well.
The problem is this generates rather unreadable reject messages:
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
On Thu Aug 23 2007 at 11:47:17 CEST, Dave Evans wrote:
But why would you want to accept and silently discard mail? If the mail
contains a virus, don't you think it's better that the sender is told so?
No! That causes collateral spam! Think faked sender...
-JP
--
## List details
On 23/08/07, Jan-Piet Mens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why would you want to accept and silently discard mail? If the mail
contains a virus, don't you think it's better that the sender is told so?
No! That causes collateral spam! Think faked sender...
Not if you're rejecting during the
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:52:27AM +0200, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
On Thu Aug 23 2007 at 11:47:17 CEST, Dave Evans wrote:
But why would you want to accept and silently discard mail? If the mail
contains a virus, don't you think it's better that the sender is told so?
No! That causes
Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
But why would you want to accept and silently discard mail? If the mail
contains a virus, don't you think it's better that the sender is told so?
No! That causes collateral spam! Think faked sender...
No it doesn't. Not if you reject during SMTP. Collateral spam is
Mike Cardwell wrote:
What the original author of this thread is looking for here is
fakereject. If you do this:
accept control = fakereject
Then the message will look to the sender as though it has been accepted,
but instead of hitting the routers it will just disappear into a
John Hall pisze:
But why would you want to accept and silently discard mail? If the mail
contains a virus, don't you think it's better that the sender is told so?
No! That causes collateral spam! Think faked sender...
Not if you're rejecting during the SMTP transaction, which
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:37:57PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
Not if you're rejecting during the SMTP transaction, which is I think
what was being discussed originally.
Correct, *but the default clamav message saying so is unreadable*.
So I need to blackhole the message myself (do
Marcin Krol wrote:
But why would you want to accept and silently discard mail? If the mail
contains a virus, don't you think it's better that the sender is told so?
No! That causes collateral spam! Think faked sender...
Not if you're rejecting during the SMTP transaction,
Dave Evans pisze:
This is fine, but ONLY if you send the message to the correct person, which is
usually NOT $sender_address. Alas in most environments you won't know who
to send it to!
Do NOT automatically send messages to $sender_address!
Well of course that would generate mostly
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:07:25PM +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
Dave Evans pisze:
This is fine, but ONLY if you send the message to the correct person, which
is
usually NOT $sender_address. Alas in most environments you won't know who
to send it to!
Do NOT automatically send messages
Marcin Krol wrote:
Hello,
OK, so as some of you may know, clamav now features filtering out
phishing and/or spam as well.
The problem is this generates rather unreadable reject messages:
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
host mail.da4.promo.pl
Marcin Krol wrote:
John Hall pisze:
But why would you want to accept and silently discard mail? If the mail
contains a virus, don't you think it's better that the sender is told so?
No! That causes collateral spam! Think faked sender...
Not if you're
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:56:20AM +0100, Mike Cardwell wrote:
Marcin Krol wrote:
But why would you want to accept and silently discard mail? If the mail
contains a virus, don't you think it's better that the sender is told so?
No! That causes collateral spam! Think faked
Michael Sprague wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:56:20AM +0100, Mike Cardwell wrote:
Marcin Krol wrote:
But why would you want to accept and silently discard mail? If the mail
contains a virus, don't you think it's better that the sender is told so?
No!
Here's a little bit of a modification to the traditional way to use
ClamAV to give more meaningful rejection messages
warnmalware = */defer_ok
set acl_c_clam_message = ${lc:$malware_name}
dropcondition = ${if
match{$acl_c_clam_message}{trojan|worm}{true}{false}}
message
18 matches
Mail list logo
