Re: [exim] Not frozing on unexistent user

2006-02-20 Thread Giuliano Gavazzi
On 18 Feb 2006, at 01:53, Jakob Hirsch wrote: But it would be better to replicate B's user list to A, so A will not accept such mail any more. Otherwise you'll create colleral spam. that's the kind way of putting it. Likely and hopefully you'll end up on some blacklist. Too much load on B?

Re: [exim] Not frozing on unexistent user

2006-02-20 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 20:58 +, Peter Bowyer wrote: verify = recipient/callout One should never say the above without explicitly including the 'use_sender' option -- since recipient verification without use_sender is fairly much broken. verify = recipient/callout,use_sender -- dwmw2 --

Re: [exim] Not frozing on unexistent user

2006-02-20 Thread John W. Baxter
On 2/20/06 2:04 PM, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 20:58 +, Peter Bowyer wrote: verify = recipient/callout One should never say the above without explicitly including the 'use_sender' option -- since recipient verification without use_sender is fairly

Re: [exim] Not frozing on unexistent user

2006-02-20 Thread Giuliano Gavazzi
On 21 Feb 2006, at 01:18, John W. Baxter wrote: On 2/20/06 2:04 PM, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 20:58 +, Peter Bowyer wrote: verify = recipient/callout One should never say the above without explicitly including the 'use_sender' option -- since

Re: [exim] Not frozing on unexistent user

2006-02-20 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 20/02/06, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 20:58 +, Peter Bowyer wrote: verify = recipient/callout One should never say the above without explicitly including the 'use_sender' option -- since recipient verification without use_sender is fairly much

[exim] Not frozing on unexistent user

2006-02-17 Thread Maykel Moya
Host A relays mail to host B. A receives mail from outside the network. When A accepts a mail for some unexistent recipient in B, the mail is frozen on A. Given that the condition of unexistent will remain on B, how can I say A that generate a bounce when B reject the message, instead of frozing

Re: [exim] Not frozing on unexistent user

2006-02-17 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 17/02/06, Maykel Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Host A relays mail to host B. A receives mail from outside the network. When A accepts a mail for some unexistent recipient in B, the mail is frozen on A. Given that the condition of unexistent will remain on B, how can I say A that generate

Re: [exim] Not frozing on unexistent user

2006-02-17 Thread Maykel Moya
El vie, 17-02-2006 a las 20:58 +, Peter Bowyer escribió: On 17/02/06, Maykel Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Host A relays mail to host B. A receives mail from outside the network. When A accepts a mail for some unexistent recipient in B, the mail is frozen on A. Given that the

Re: [exim] Not frozing on unexistent user

2006-02-17 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Maykel Moya wrote: Given that the condition of unexistent will remain on B, how can I say A that generate a bounce when B reject the message, instead of frozing it. That is the default operation, so the config must have been changed in some strange way. Maybe there's no dnslookup router, so A