[exim] Re: smtp authorization test via telnet?

2006-02-07 Thread meburke
Thank you all for your help! I entirely missed the log_selector parameter and I misunderstood what I read about the -bh options (probably as a result of trying to eat too much in one meal). Jakob wrote: (in response to POP-before-SMTP) You can have that with Exim, too, but I'd rather not

Re: [exim] Re: smtp authorization test via telnet?

2006-02-07 Thread Jakob Hirsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jakob wrote: (in response to POP-before-SMTP) the pros and cons on this? Or, alternatively, can you give me a short version of your thinking on this? pop-before-smtp is merely hack, introduced because there smtp had no authentication facility. But that is long ago,

[exim] Re: smtp authorization test via telnet?

2006-02-06 Thread meburke
Marc wrote: You've already been told about swaks. However, if you do post here again in the future, please do not obfuscate: http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/MailingListEtiquette#head-a6f7fb5ce8816568569a321f783315207ec38063 Thank you for the link. However, I'm doing tech support for a server

Re: [exim] Re: smtp authorization test via telnet?

2006-02-06 Thread Stephen Gran
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 02:37:21PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Marc wrote: With the other MTA's I test, I can emulate the account I'm mailing from and see the results in gory detail. I haven't found a way to do that yet using exim, so I thought I'd ask here since this group seems

Re: [exim] Re: smtp authorization test via telnet?

2006-02-06 Thread Jakob Hirsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: terminal window. Although I've telnetted to port 25 thousands of times on thousands of servers, I've seldom run across a session that didn't let me send mail outside the domain after authenticating with POP3. You can have that with Exim, too, but I'd rather not