On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:50:00AM +0800, W B Hacker wrote:
Dean Brooks wrote:
Bill Hacker wrote:
'Legacy', perhaps, but not 'non-standard' w/r our use of
those two ports.
Using it on 587 is non-standard
The IANA registration has not specified port 587 for any
particular protocol, smtp or
Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:50:00AM +0800, W B Hacker wrote:
*SNIP*
I know, let's all advocate overriding sane client defaults in everything
we reply to. I mean, that wouldn't be confusing for new posters or people
asking questions, would it?
Given that most
On 8 Feb 2006, at 03:50, W B Hacker wrote:
urd465/tcpURL Rendesvous Directory for SSM
do they mean rendezvous? (and shouldn't it be bonjour anyway?)
g
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use
Hello,
should exim support receiving a STARTTLS *before* receiving an EHLO?
openssl s_client -connect ssl.schlittermann.de:25 -starttls smtp
ends with error:
T 212.80.235.130:25 - 10.10.10.6:1411 [AP]
220 pu.schlittermann.de ESMTP Exim 4.60 Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:39:48 +0100..
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 11:43 +0100, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Hello,
should exim support receiving a STARTTLS *before* receiving an EHLO?
No.
STARTTLS is a ESMTP feature. Exim starts in SMTP mode and only offers
ESMTP features if the client requests them by using a EHLO start, at
which
Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
should exim support receiving a STARTTLS *before* receiving an EHLO?
no.
Well, it wouldn't hurt (just like allowing AUTH before EHLO), but why? No
proper client would do it.
openssl s_client -connect ssl.schlittermann.de:25 -starttls smtp
503 STARTTLS
W B Hacker wrote:
It does do so.
That is the 'legacy' ssl mode AKA 'tls_on_connect'
Bill, please be more careful about answering questions with incorrect
information. tls_on_connect does not involve sending the STARTTLS
command _at_all_. The connection is SSL-encrypted from the moment
Jakob Hirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Di 07 Feb 2006 13:28:36 CET):
Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
should exim support receiving a STARTTLS *before* receiving an EHLO?
no.
Well, it wouldn't hurt (just like allowing AUTH before EHLO), but why? No
proper client would do it.
Hey - I didn't ask for
Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
OpenSSL 0.9.7e 25 Oct 2004
OpenSSL 0.9.8a 11 Oct 2005
both do not send 'EHLO'. (Debian)
Looking at the sources, they put it into 0.9.7 starting with the f
version, but not in 0.9.8/8a (for whatever reason). The change is trivial,
it does not even check if
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 04:44:57AM +0800, W B Hacker wrote:
Marc Sherman wrote:
This has come up before; if you're going to recommend to random list
posters that they configure 587 for tls_on_connect, please warn them
explicitly that your configuration is very non-standard.
'Legacy',
Dean Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 04:44:57AM +0800, W B Hacker wrote:
Marc Sherman wrote:
This has come up before; if you're going to recommend to
random list posters that they configure 587 for
tls_on_connect, please warn them explicitly that your
configuration is very
11 matches
Mail list logo
