Re: [exim] fatal errors in BSMTP transport

2006-02-14 Thread Matthias Waffenschmidt
Hi, On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:10:49PM +0100, Marco Herrn wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:11:47PM +0100, Paul Dekkers wrote: But what is still confusing me, is that the mail don't get delivered. When spamc gets a timeout, that should be a 4xx error (which is the case). But why does the

Re: [exim] fatal errors in BSMTP transport

2006-02-14 Thread Marco Herrn
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 01:04:59PM +0100, Matthias Waffenschmidt wrote: On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:10:49PM +0100, Marco Herrn wrote: Would be nice, if exim itself could try to redeliver the mail through the transport after such errors. Is that possible in any way? Use the pipe transport

Re: [exim] fatal errors in BSMTP transport

2006-02-11 Thread Marco Herrn
Hi, On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:11:47PM +0100, Paul Dekkers wrote: But what is still confusing me, is that the mail don't get delivered. When spamc gets a timeout, that should be a 4xx error (which is the case). But why does the message bounce? ... good question :-) (Hmm, the exim -bS

Re: [exim] fatal errors in BSMTP transport

2006-02-11 Thread Paul Dekkers
Hi, Marco Herrn wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:11:47PM +0100, Paul Dekkers wrote: But what is still confusing me, is that the mail don't get delivered. When spamc gets a timeout, that should be a 4xx error (which is the case). But why does the message bounce? ... good

Re: [exim] fatal errors in BSMTP transport

2006-02-10 Thread Marco Herrn
I am wondering if replacing (simplified, left out my -d ip,ip and more complex -u for spamc): command = /usr/local/sbin/exim -oMr spam-scanned -bS transport_filter = /usr/local/bin/spamc -f -s 50 -u nobody with for instance: command = /usr/local/bin/spamc -B -f -t 30 -s 50

Re: [exim] fatal errors in BSMTP transport

2006-02-10 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Marco Herrn wrote: 2006-02-09 13:19:49 1F7Am3-0008Uf-W1 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=fmmailgate01.web.de [217.72.192.221] P=esmtp S=30388 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-09 13:24:49 1F7Am3-0008Uf-W1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: spamcheck transport output: An error was detected while processing a file of BSMTP

Re: [exim] fatal errors in BSMTP transport

2006-02-10 Thread Marco Herrn
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 08:15:09PM +0100, Jakob Hirsch wrote: Marco Herrn wrote: 2006-02-09 13:19:49 1F7Am3-0008Uf-W1 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=fmmailgate01.web.de [217.72.192.221] P=esmtp S=30388 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-09 13:24:49 1F7Am3-0008Uf-W1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: spamcheck

Re: [exim] fatal errors in BSMTP transport

2006-02-10 Thread Marco Herrn
I am wondering if replacing (simplified, left out my -d ip,ip and more complex -u for spamc): command = /usr/local/sbin/exim -oMr spam-scanned -bS transport_filter = /usr/local/bin/spamc -f -s 50 -u nobody with for instance: command = /usr/local/bin/spamc -B -f -t 30 -s

Re: [exim] fatal errors in BSMTP transport

2006-02-10 Thread Paul Dekkers
Hi, Marco Herrn wrote: 2006-02-09 13:19:49 1F7Am3-0008Uf-W1 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=fmmailgate01.web.de [217.72.192.221] P=esmtp S=30388 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-09 13:24:49 1F7Am3-0008Uf-W1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: spamcheck transport output: An error was detected while processing a file of BSMTP

Re: [exim] fatal errors in BSMTP transport

2006-02-09 Thread Paul Dekkers
Hi, Marco Herrn wrote: I am running exim 4.50 with virtual domains/users. Some of the users get their mails checked for spam by a seperate transport. Since yesterday some mails were rejected, because of problems with this transport. Funny thing is that today a similar thing happened to me.