Quoting Avleen Vig:
I don't think that should be the case.
If Daniel is sending packets larger than 400 bytes, it is his OWN router
that should complain that the packets are too large before they leave
the network.
If Google/gmail is really blocking icmp fragmentation-needed (which I
doubt),
Quoting Menekhem M. Zviman:
host gateway-r.comcast.net [204.127.198.26]: 550-69.250.247.7 blocked by
ldap:ou=rblmx,dc=comcast,dc=net
550 Comcast.net subscribers are not permitted to directly connect to
this mail server.
Looks like the same as T-Online is doing: The MXs are not
Quoting W B Hacker:
Can anyone confirm that spam_score_int is (and is intended to be) an
*unsigned* integer?
Of course not, many scores are negative, like your mail:
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
Oh, and please don't steal threads (last point of MailingListEtiquette).
--
## List details at
Quoting Alex:
Where place exim the lock file?
It's been a while since I used mbox, but AFAIR the lock file is, by
convention, put in the same directory as the mbox.
Chapter 26 of the spec tells you how to enable locking.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
Quoting W B Hacker:
Steal threads *how* ?? I started a new one.
No, you replied to a message in an existing thread, otherwise there
would have been no References and In-Reply-To header.
Still not sure where the negative spam score is coming from BTW
low bayes score, whitelisting, whatever
Quoting Marten Lehmann:
can I tell exim to send the message to spamd or av_scanner using
CRLF-sequences instead of just LF? For routers and transports there is
looking at spool_mbox.c, I'd say no (apart from changing the code). But
why would you want to do that?
--
## List details at
Doug Jolley wrote:
My first problem is that in response to this:
$ openssl s_client -connect localhost:25
-starttls smtp
Which openssl version?
see
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060206/msg00072.html
--
## List details at
Quoting Sub Zero:
How would you do it, to the full extend? Use dyndns?
Exactly...
There were already lots of discussion about this topic in the past. The
bottom line is: If it's not guaranteed that your IP address will never
be assigned to somebody else (as with most dialin/DSL services), you
Quoting Doug Jolley:
know why 0.9.7a doesn't work. The problem with
0.9.7h is that with it, I don't see an
advertisement of the LOGIN and PLAIN methods.
You have to say EHLO something after the SSL connection is
established. The output you see from openssl is the unencrypted one.
--
##
Quoting Marc Sherman:
I'd particularly enjoy it if we could all start addressing each other
by our last names. I'm pretty sure that Mr. Haber would agree with me
Cool idea! In future, I'd like to be referred to as Mr. White. If that's
taken, Mr. Pink would also be ok.
Anyway, I don't know
Quoting Daniel Tiefnig:
Sadfully this is not the case with every IMAP installation out there.
(Cyrus e.g. may use / instead of . to delimit subfolders.)
This may be true for the frontend (IMAP), but surely not for the
backend, which is the only thing that matters to Exim. Cyrus uses some
Quoting Andrew Lewis:
I have a desire to execute mysql delete statements in my remote_smtp
transport :) which would be rather useful to me. I'm having problems
finding a suitable place to put this though. I was abusing
Basically, any option that is expanded, but you should use harmless one,
I added this to the Wiki. Feel free to go there and make it better.
done.
For the future, I suggest that this page should be modifiable only by
the site or list administrators (considering the official character of
it, I think this is appropriate). At least, it should say itself that
it's not
Wakko Warner wrote:
I have a desire to execute mysql delete statements in my remote_smtp
transport :) which would be rather useful to me. I'm having problems
How about:
condition = ${lookup mysql {...} {yes}{yes}}
That was also my first guess and I'd prefer that, but condition is only
valid
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
handle lower limits. OTOH, the designated error code is 552, which clients
ah, only in rfc 821, 2821 specifies 452. sorry for the noise.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki
Quoting Chris Miller:
In other words, if the user's domain is listed in +filtered_domains,
only accept it from +filtering_servers, otherwise process normally.
in acl_check_rcpt:
defer
message = use the proper MX
domains = +filtered_domains
hosts = +filtering_servers
use deny instead of
Chris Miller wrote:
That is true, there will be messages from localhost that should be
accepted. How can I allow it from localhost, but have the rule applied to
remote hosts?
simply add localhost (127.0.0.1) to the list of allowed hosts, either in
filtering_servers (not so good) or the acl
Quoting Daniel:
incomming connections, and REJECT outgoing connections. DROP will send
the packet to nowhere making you somewhat invisible and make the
initiating connection wait and wait (this is good) However, you should
No, that's security by obscurity, which is not good and its
Quoting Marc Sherman:
Even if you know positively that the sender is a spammer, their SMTP
service will keep reconnecting over and over for each additional
message (if dropped at MAIL/DATA) or recipient (if dropped at RCPT)
that is still queued.
That's true for real SMTP servers. It's false
Dave Holland wrote:
So - just an informal survey of blacklists. What's your most favorite,
semi-favorite, and least favority black lists?
This is a personal opinion...
BEST:
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org cbl.abuseat.org relays.ordb.org relays.visi.com
relays.visi.com is down since Dec 2004...
Quoting Dave Holland:
Please keep list traffic on the list.
And I think no single external list is valid for DENY.
Each to their own.
Sure, that's why I wrote I think :)
I used a few in the past for blacklisting myself, but I had not a good
feeling about it. I don't like to rely on
Quoting Alastair Campbell:
I would like to have a rule somewhere that says If email subject
matches ('failure notice' | 'Undelivered' | 'Returned mail') and is not
addressed to a specific (known) email address, dump it.
dump is bad, deny tells the sender that you don't want that mail.
To
Quoting Alastair Campbell:
Thanks for the reply Jakob. Are you saying that it would be best to use
the second option (quoted above), instead of the first, or as well?
I'd use only the first one.
That second one doesn't seem to identify that it's a bounce, or am I
misunderstanding?
Alastair Campbell wrote:
I'd use only the first one.
Ok, thanks. I'll look up acl_smtp_data in the Exim docs to get my
bearing, and hopefully find a way of testing it before it becomes active.
Oh, sorry, braino (it was way too late), I meant the second one, i.e. in
acl_check_rcpt, because
Alastair Campbell wrote:
Jacob's suggestion was for acl_check_rcpt:
^ harrumph :)
deny senders = : ! local_parts = [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] message = This address never sends out mail, so it
cannot get bounces.
Is there is a way of selecting the catch all, in my case
Alastair Campbell wrote:
So you have your normal addresses in this file and this wildcard
entry at the end? Then you can use this:
! local_parts = lsearch;/etc/mail/virtual/domain.com
Now, um, which file is that in? Just grepping for lsearch in the routers
The same as before, where your
Quoting Steven Wayne:
system filter:
I prefer:
in my .muttrc
Sure, different approach, same result.
I like to have it on the server, like the filter for the imap
subfolders, to be independent from the MUA.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
Grant Peel wrote:
Thanks for the reply magnus, but the reason I was asking was for my own
selfish reasons. I have some clients I know are emailing huge attachments
and things and I want that to be reflected in their bandwidth usage via
ipa dn ipfw. to do this, I need the outgoing data to be
Pablo L. Arturi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# echo pseudo-tst | exim -d+all-memory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
21:23:50 31285 group daemon was not found
Hm... other things to try:
$ ls -l /usr/sbin/exim
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 2511326 May 2 13:39 /usr/sbin/exim
$ ls -l /etc/group
-rw-r--r-- 1
Tim Jackson wrote:
You are, of course, right. I must be going completely barking. Yes,
those are in a router. The key point still stands though, that it is
cleaner than some other proposed solutions as a) it's simple and b) it's
all in one place.
That's only true if all the mail you want the
Chris Blaise wrote:
Note that the SMTP standard requires clients to wait at least
10 minutes for the post-DATA response. If Outlook only waits
1 minute then it is not compliant with the specification.
What a surprise!
Well, no. RFC 2821 says SHOULD in this matter, not MUST.
and RFC 2112
B. Cook wrote:
Is anyone else being bombarded by these?
grep -c H=(netzero.com) /var/log/exim/mainlog 167232
I have something like 35k uniq ips.. or am I the only lucky one today?
About 160 (small server), started on June 1st. The usual EHLO friend is
still No 1.
Most of the clients are on
John W. Baxter wrote:
It would indeed be nice to be able to produce arbitrary queries within
Exim (not just for MySQL although that's the one we use).
Um... the exim spec doesn't limit queries to SELECTs and say you have to
use the results of a query, so something like this works perfectly
Stefan Klatt wrote:
- main variables like qualify_domain
- integer variables like max_rcpt
how can i set them with ldap queries?
looking at the spec, I'd say you can't, because they are not expanded.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Quoting Stefan Klatt:
- main variables like qualify_domain
- integer variables like max_rcpt
how can i set them with ldap queries?
looking at the spec, I'd say you can't, because they are not expanded.
Both? where is this information?
From spec.txt:
|qualify_domain|Use: main|Type:
Martin Klewitz [gamigo AG] wrote:
Is there a possibility to read the matching emails from a plain text file
where all the addresses that should be relayed are listed one per line?
this should do:
additional_route:
driver = manualroute
condition = ${lookup [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
Odhiambo G. Washington wrote:
I have have a server which is where all deliveries are done. This server
is not advertised anymore in DNS, but spammers are still sending to
it in defiance of my TTL from DNS configuration.
I know that most of my clients who use this server are located within
Alex Miller wrote:
Is there any history with problems with gmail, in particular, with
forwarding?
Nothing I remember (but my memory is a little faulty :)
When I send an email FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] the email gets destroyed. The host provider
says that it's nothing they
Jess Mooers wrote:
ASSP used to have a list that I could enter email addresses and
domains that I could whitelist. These whitelisted domains/addresses
would not check with dnsbl's or the spam filters. I have a list that
I have built over the last 2 years, and don't want to have to start
Doug wrote:
test_router:
condition = ${if eq
{${lc:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fail}:
driver = manualroute
transport = remote_smtp
route_list = * x.x.x.x
Test it with
exim -d+expand -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to see what is going wrong.
btw, condition is not needed.
Rainer Sigl wrote:
I would like to save the content of $local_part into another variable
that I can use the orignal value later. How to do this?
That's what address_data is for. Depending on what you are doing, you
could also use $original_local_part.
--
## List details at
Ian P. Christian wrote:
To do this, I obviously need to generate a random number - is this possible
in
the ACLs? I've hacked it in using perl at the moment, but I'm just curious as
I don't think it's a good idea to do such stuff in the MTA, during SMTP
connections. Anyway, this might help
Quoting Wayne Pascoe:
This SMTP AUTH setup works for me:
[ . . . deletium . . . ]
# End of Exim configuration file
I've just tested that and it works beautifully! Thanks a stack :D
Note that this config is a little dangerous. You are probably better off
using the config from the wiki
Quoting Wayne Pascoe:
(http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/FAQ/Policy_controls/Q0730).
I think I'm being thick, but I can't really see the major difference
between what is in the Wiki and what Juha posted. Could someone please
enlighten me?
Actually, Juha's version is also in the Wiki
Quoting W B Hacker:
http://conducive.org/threading.tiff
You miss a very effective way to read mailing lists. See how it could
look like: http://plonk.de/stuff/threading.png
And, again, will someone kindly tell me what headers leave alone so as to
help
*others*?
um... I told you a while
Quoting W B Hacker:
look like: http://plonk.de/stuff/threading.png
Thanks - but that is exactly the sort of artistic but useless eye-confusion I
need to avoid, and the primary reason I use threading ONLY to check the point.
Well, tastes obviously differ. I usually don't even look into the
Quoting Ian P. Christian:
set acl_m3 = ${lookup sqlite {SQLITE_DB SPAM_COUNT}{$value}}
However, this will obviously return nothing if the host has never mailed
before, and the 'Spam total' reports as NULL.
set acl_m3 = ${lookup sqlite {SQLITE_DB SPAM_COUNT}{$value}{0}}
Will
Quoting Ian P. Christian:
set acl_m3 = ${lookup sqlite {SQLITE_DB SPAM_COUNT}{$value}}
However, this will obviously return nothing if the host has never mailed
before, and the 'Spam total' reports as NULL.
set acl_m3 = ${lookup sqlite {SQLITE_DB SPAM_COUNT}{$value}{0}}
Will
Quoting Marc Haber:
I am wondering whether it is appopriate to do that check at MAIL or at
RCPT time. What do you think?
(Default config's) Sender verification is done in the RCPT ACL, so I'd
say this is also the right point for other checks that would logically
belong into the MAIL ACL. (HELO
Quoting Chris Meadors:
I keep thinking I want to move the HELO checks to the HELO ACL, and test
You cannot test in the HELO ACL if the sender issued no HELO.
the envelope sender in the MAIL ACL. But then I remember I do want to
accept mail from broken severs and bad senders that is
Quoting Marc Haber:
IIRC, the reason for that was that some broken MTAs do not recognise
permanent errors on MAIL FROM as permanent, so they keep trying to send
until their queue timeout hits. I wonder if such trash is still in use
today.
Yes, but these broken MTAs send HELO, and will thus
Quoting Luca Bertoncello:
server_set_id = $value
$value is not defined outside ${lookup ...}. Use $1 (or $auth1 since 4.61).
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
Quoting Troy Engel:
directory = /var/spool/vmail/Maildir/\
${if eq {$h_X-Spam:}{Yes} {.Junk/}}
Oh. That should've been
directory = $home/Maildir/...
or
file = /var/spool/mail/$local_part/...
or whatever mailbox type you use.
But I guess you figured that out already. :)
--
## List
Quoting Коваленко Иван:
Is there a way to combine logical expressions in dnslists.
Is this a question.
Lists in the same dnslists condition are ORed. Conditions are ANDed.
Task: reject hosts which are in list1.list but not in list2.list
deny
dnslists = list1.list
! dnslists = list2.list
Quoting Marc Haber:
Same thing happens when clamav is reloading its virus databases after
an upgrade. No big deal, but annoying, since the panic log gets these
messages and log checking mechanisms are going to fire.
I'd like exim to behave a little more tolerant here.
It probably should,
Quoting Jon Scottorn:
I am wondering if anyone can tell me what I am missing. I was
previously running Exim4 ver 4.60 with spamassassin ver 3.1.1. I just
upgraded both exim to 4.62 and spamassassin 3.1.4. Now exim is not even
atempting to check with spamassassin. I am using the same
Quoting Stanislaw Halik:
expand ${eval: 1 + 2}/.spambox
Unfortunately, this will expand to `/.spambox' instead of an empty
string if the ${lookup returns an empty string.
${lookup mysql {...} {${value}/.spambox}}
But where should it be delivered, when the lookup fails? When the
transport's
Quoting Rory Campbell-Lange:
server_set_id = \
${if and {{eq{$2}${lookup pgsql {
SELECT password FROM users where userid || '@' || domain =
'${quote_pgsql:$1}'
{yes}{no}}
I don't really understand you problem, but I would use this:
public_name = PLAIN
...
Quoting Kjetil Torgrim Homme:
most people these days use GNU grep (the fastest grep in the West, as
the slogan goes):
$ ls -l /bin/egrep /bin/fgrep
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2006-08-11 05:53 /bin/egrep - grep
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2006-08-11 05:53 /bin/fgrep - grep
Sure, and fgrep is
Quoting Kjetil Torgrim Homme:
most people these days use GNU grep (the fastest grep in the West, as
the slogan goes):
Sure, and fgrep is the same as grep -F. But matching fixed strings is
usually faster than matching regexes (depending on CPU and IO speed).
yes, but the expression used was a
Quoting Stanier, Alan M:
Is it possible to use the system-filter to detect emails with an
attachment of a certain name?
Maybe (i.e., I don't know), but you'd better use the MIME ACLs for that.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Quoting Ian Eiloart:
I got this error:
make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target `dk.h'
I've not chosen to use any of the experimental modules, and don't seem to
from exim.h:
#ifdef EXPERIMENTAL_DOMAINKEYS
#include dk.h
#endif
so you seem to have domainkeys support activated. Or
Quoting Odhiambo G. Washington:
I believe my problem is just how to get rid of the parentheses from the
result of the
lookup.
${sg {$value} {\N[\[\]]\N} {}}
strips all [ and ]
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
Quoting W B Hacker:
Urgh, yuck. Why not use an ACL variable?
Simple reason here was that we don't have any left to spare.
(unless Phil bumped from 0-9 to 0-99 when I wasn't looking...)
It's (compile time) configurable since 4.61, I think.
And with a little luck, one of the next releases will
Quoting Gordon McKee:
I get the following error temporarily rejected after DATA: cannot test
domains condition in DATA ACL
Been looking through the web for age to no avail!!
You cannot test domain in the data acl, because a message can have more
than one recipient.
Solutions are well
Quoting Gordon McKee:
No not trying anything fancy with fetchmail - just using smtp.
well, whatever you want, but it could be much easier in fetchmail.
I have the relay domains in relay_to_domains and this domain in
local+domains. I have tried accept hosts = 127.0.0.1 : +relay_domains but
Quoting Mark Adams:
I'm having problems setting up a relay for an external IP address range,
the following has been setup in acl_check_rcpt
accept
hosts = SPECIAL_RELAY
log_message = SPECIAL ACCEPT: $sender_address locally specially
whitelisted
SPECIAL_RELAY is defined in
Quoting W B Hacker:
server_setid = $auth1
We would need (at least) two separate variables for the challenge-response
process.
Our passwords and UID's do not resemble user@domain
Fine, that would make a lousy password anyway :)
- and are neither the same, nor even the same
Quoting Toralf Lund:
What do I get if I do something like
${eval:$some_variable+1}
when some_variable is not actually defined?
An undefined variable expands to nothing (except for acl_m/acl_c
variables, if you have the strict_acl_vars option set), so this is the
same as ${eval:+1}, which
Quoting Peter Bowyer:
My big worry about this is that you're completely dependent on the
behaviour of the other MTA - you've no logging, nothing to tweak,
can't whitelist, just have to trust that the people sending you wanted
mail are going to do the 'right thing'. That alone has kept me from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to add a condition to a router that is triggered by the
senders domain. I am struggling to find an example in the Wiki and
the specification. All of the examples for routers seem to be based
on destination rather than source :-(
See
Mike Cardwell wrote:
I have a manualroute router that connects to a server that quite often
sends 45x responses at the end of the data phase, for periods of a few
hours. What I would like if this happens, is for the next router to be
tried instead (dnslookup).
Because of the way Exim
Quoting Johann Spies:
I don't want to use SPF and don't want to start a flame war on it
(again) but I want to stop backscatter-spam.
Isn't that what Exim's builtin BATV prvs is about?
Note that it assumes (as probably all solutions like that) that all mail
is sent through systems controlled
Alejandro Lengua wrote:
Is there a way to make EXIM, not include the original IP of the sender?
I use this modified received_header_text on my private server:
received_header_text = Received: \
${if !def:authenticated_id \
{${if def:sender_rcvhost \
{from $sender_rcvhost\n\t} \
Quoting Philip Hazel:
Just so you all know: this is my last day at work before retiring. I am
about to unsubscribe from the exim-users list. However, I will stay on
the exim-dev list for the moment and I am continuing to maintain PCRE.
It's been fun interacting with all you over the
Quoting Roland Illig:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@server.de
See
http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch40.html#id2712900
and
http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch44.html#SECTsubmodnon
and
Brent Jones wrote:
directory = ${lookup{$sender_host_address}lsearch{/etc/storetable}}
And here is what the /etc/storetable contains
10.0.0.1: /var/mail/catch/main/
appendfile: file or directory name is not absolute
I'd say it should, but it seems that the lookup returns nothing, so
Quoting Dave Pooser:
Until I discovered that if pipelining_advertise_hosts is set to all (as per
default) and the sending server is pipelining to 3 users, there's no
response until all three delays have occurred-- and in this case 60s was
enough for the sending server to timeout.
This was
Robert Bannocks wrote:
As said both work on their own. However when I try to combine them with
an or statement things break. I am missing something here quite
fundamental. Can anyone assist?
What was the exact expansion you tried?
Something like
${if or { \
{crypteq {...}} \
{ldapauth
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Local deliveries are just a low percentage of all the e-mail traffic
and I consider to skip them and deliver all e-mails via smtp.
For example I could comment out the following line from the
lookup-router: domains = ! +local_domains
You can do that, but you'll have
Quoting Neil Youngman:
When trying to decide whether a match was case sensitive or not, all
I could find in the documentation was the PCRE_CASELESS option is
set when the matching is required to be case-insensitive. It seems
that PCRE_CASELESS is set for this condition
condition=${if or
Quoting Phil Pennock:
droplog_message = REJECT mail from rbl
message = rejected because $sender_host_address is \
in a black list at \
$dnslist_domain\n$dnslist_text
dnslists =
Phil Pennock wrote:
Huh? Which list? The only list involved here is dnslists, and there's no
ipv6 address given.
(2) There clearly is an IPv6 address given, since the default lookup
value is $sender_host_address which, in the given case, was IPv6.
So you think $sender_host_address is
Quoting Heiko Schlittermann:
Couldn't it be a kind of smart behaviour, if Exim (as sending MTA)
would detect the fact, that the connection died at some point during the
RCPT TO phase? And then for the next attempt Exim could reduce some
internal max_rcpt to higher the chance that at least
Quoting Marten Lehmann:
we have used remote_max_parallel = 20 for a long time and it worked
fine. But currently we cannot deliver emails to a big German ISP
(t-online), because their mailservers respond with
421 IP:x.x.x.x - Maximum parallel connections for your IP-Address reached
It
CR wrote:
What I want to do is setup Exim to take an incoming message destined for
Excite.com and have it use the SMTP server from the DNS provider to get
the job done. Ideally, I would have a text file with domains where this
operation would be necessary to deliver mail, as I am positive
Quoting Luca Bertoncello:
Unfortunately, I can't do it from Exim, because there is no ACL called after
an
authentication failure.
There are possibilities to work around this:
- instead of fail at the end of your server_condition, use ${lookup
your_db {INSERT INTO ... ON DUPLICATE KEY
Quoting Luca Bertoncello:
Just another question: is it possibile to DROP the connection if the
authenticator fails?
AFAIK not immediately, because that would need something like
acl_smtp_postauth, which is not implemented in exim.
But you can drop it after the next command (which could be
Hi,
this likely to be an issue at the receiving end, or a networking issue
between the two hosts, or is it a simple misconfiguration at my end?
could be
- the notorious MTU issue, caused by dumb ICMP filtering (on your side
or the remote, but then they'd have this problem with most sites).
Marten Lehmann wrote:
I need to extract the value X-purgate-ID from $spam_report:
X-purgate: Spam
X-purgate-ID: 150741::080616223818-6C9786C0-73CE72D8/2129941411-0/0-3
X-purgate-Ad: For more information about eXpurgate please visit
http://www.expurgate.net/
Does this work?
Searcher wrote:
Say I am sending an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I want my MTA to
attempt the delivery only ONCE. In case the email has been bounced back
discard that particular email from the queue and move on. All other emails
on the system should use the default resending options.
Uhm,
Quoting Philip Hazel:
This problem wouldn't exist if there were some inbuilt functions for
working with hash style acl variables, other than extracting from
them.
Agreed. I'd love to see that in future exim versions...
The next release of Exim allows you to make up your own names for ACL
Hi,
according to the spec, match_domain can be used with named domain lists,
like ${if match_domain{$domain}{+local_domains}{...
But what happens, if the named list has a query style lookup, like
domainlist virtual_domains = mysql;SELECT name FROM domain WHERE
name='${quote_mysql:$domain}'
Quoting W B Hacker:
Is it possible to have Exim write to a dbm/dbmnz as part of a string
expansion or are only reads possible?
Not sure SQLLite is the best of the SQL's for 'sidestepping' the issue where
writes may be involved. ISTR it works against a file and has rather basic or
'coarse
Quoting W B Hacker:
FWIW, there's a configurable lock timeout for sqlite (defaults to 5s),
which should be sufficient as long as you are not excessively
updating/inserting, which is unlikely in an MTA.
'...as long as..'
The important word was excessively. Locking and concurrency is an
issue
Quoting Online4You:
How can I pass on information between routers so the next router can check
for something set in the previous router?
address_data
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with
Quoting Philip Hazel:
domainlist virtual_domains = mysql;SELECT name FROM domain WHERE
name='${quote_mysql:$domain}'
This should always work, as the spec also says: ... , whenever a domain
list is being scanned, $domain contains the subject domain.
I think I have found the bug that you have
Quoting Marten Lehmann:
Is there anything planned for exim that includes builtin greylisting
support?
I don't think so. Why should anybody spend time for something that can
be done easily within Exim, probably much more flexible than an builtin
solution...
If not, which solutions are
Quoting Larry Rosenman:
Nov 8 08:12:24 thebighonker exim[32310]: H=5.ctyme.com
(pascal.ctyme.com) [69.50.231.5]:35579 I=[192.147.25.65]:25
Can you get the rDNS to be more legitimate?
What's wrong with that rDNS? Is it because of the 5? That seems like
a bit of an overzealous rule on your
Quoting Marten Lehmann:
I prefer my own. :)
http://plonk.de/sw/exim/greylist.txt
that looks very small and neat.
That was my intention.
Which values for the initial delay are commonly used? I think you
choosed 14 minutes, right? Is that choosen with the background that
other mailservers
101 - 200 of 482 matches
Mail list logo
