Quoting Marc Perkel:
I was just wondering if there were known MTAs that don't try all MX
records but only the lowest? Is this something that's common?
I guess by lowest, you mean the lowest preference number, i.e. the
highest priority.
qmail ist known for strange behaviour. AFAIR, it does
Quoting W B Hacker:
Use of '$interface' and 'helo_data' should allow you to force what Exim uses
to
match what you have already published in the DNS.
It was pointed out a few times on this list that you cannot user
$interface there, because the transport does not know, which address
will be
Quoting Ian Eiloart:
Well, I think that there are spam filters that are more reliable than
humans at detecting spam. That is; the spam filters get fewer false
positives.
For the common definition of spam as mail I don't want this cannot be
true. As long as there is no machine copy of my
Quoting Philip Hazel:
As soon as a server starts processing a TCP/IP connection, this variable
is
Perhaps I should add the word incoming, just in case it isn't obvious.
I'd say so. There were some people on the list stumbling over that, so
it seems to be not that obvious. Probably even
Quoting Philip Hazel:
I'd say so. There were some people on the list stumbling over that, so
it seems to be not that obvious. Probably even in detail, like It is
not set on outgoing connections, as Exim does not know the address the
OS will choose.
But it *is* set on outgoing connections -
Quoting Phillip Ryker:
I tried to do this but exim would not suck in any of the domains. I
That's because Exim does not suck. g
anyway, -be and debug mode ist your friend.
With this in your exim.conf:
domainlist test_domains = /tmp/test_domains
and this in /tmp/test_domains:
example.com
Quoting Dean Brooks:
Use something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the errors_to clause
of the unseen deliver, where [EMAIL PROTECTED] is aliased to /dev/null.
Or just leave it empty, as the spec says... not hard to find, really.
--
## List details at
Quoting Agus Ramadona:
senders = /usr/local/etc/exim/exim.whitelist
in exim.whitelist i type :
googlegroups.com
yahoogroups.com
senders is looking for the full sender address. You want is
sender_domains.
--
## List details at
Quoting Agus Ramadona:
senders = /usr/local/etc/exim/exim.whitelist
in exim.whitelist i type :
i try to change that one too but exim still reject the mail, i must be
made mistakes..
you probably have it at the wrong place.
Run a fake smtp session with
exim -d+expand+acl -bh
Quoting Jacob Lester:
After trying the suggestions in the post and googling in vain for
another solution, I continue to get the 'option maildir_format
unknown' - could anyone help my sanity and/or know of a work-around?
exim -bV should show something like this:
# exim -bV
...
Transports:
Quoting Dave Evans:
As it happens I'm currently trying to concoct a recipe for rewriting Message
IDs - not to make them more FQDN-ish, but to make them less
spammer-harvestable. Thunderbird (and other MUAs too for all I know)
generates Message IDs that end in @domain of your email address,
Quoting Kerstin Espey:
public_name= LOGIN
server_prompts = Username:: : Password::
server_condition = ${if and { \
{ or { \
{ eq {$2}{${lookup{$1}dbm{/etc/exim4/authpwd.db \
{ eq {$2}{${lookup pgsql{select m_pwd from m_accounts where
Quoting Chris Lightfoot:
Yes, it would be nice if a 5xx message could always be
taken to mean ``there is no point in retrying
automatically'', but that's not a description of the world
as it currently is.
True, but what do you thing Exim should do about it?
Treat 5xx always as temporary? I
Quoting Bill Moseley:
connection? That is, something to fake the secure session.
swaks should be able to do that, with
swaks --pipe exim -bh 10.1.1.1 -tls -q mail
but unfortunately, it does not work:
...
- STARTTLS
host in tls_verify_hosts? no (option unset)
host in
Quoting Jeremy Harris:
reload() {
exim -bV /dev/null || exit 1
kill -HUP `cat $pidfile` || restart
sleep 1; status exim
}
though status is redhat-specific, AFAIK.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Quoting John Robinson:
I believe the problem is that the option is being expanded before an
actual connection is being established.
No, smtp_active_hostname is expanded after connection, to suit
multi-homed hosts:
Which helps nothing, because the option we are talking about is helo_data.
Quoting Jörg Sommer:
Ehm, my question was not if I should use unseen. I want to know if it's
possible to match a router upon the previous or another router matched.
Or how else I can prevent duplicating of the rules if I need two
transports.
A combination of unseen and address_data (set in
Quoting Grant Peel:
For a number of weeks now, I have been trying to figure out how to
set the outgoing IP address when an authenticated user sends an
email. I have not been successful as of yet. I want to do this to
I presume you vhost setup is separated by domains, so you can use the
sender
Quoting Grant Peel:
helo_data = ${lookup
dnsdb{defer_never,ptr=$interface_address}{$value}{$primary_hostname}}
interface = $interface_address
So the interface address the mail was delivered through will be used for
the outgoing connection? Looks clever to me, almost too
Hi,
for the people not subscribed to their announce list:
http://ordb.org/news/?id=38
...
DNS and the mailing lists will vanish today, December 18, 2006.
...
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki
Quoting Nicklas Hardman:
After upgrading to 4.64 i get
temporarily rejected after DATA: failed to expand ACL string ${if or
{{eq {$sender_address_domain}{hb.se}} {={$message_size}{100k}}}
{0}{1}}: integer expected but found inside or{...} condition
Quoting Nicklas Hardman:
Ok, thanks
But how do I solve my problem?
First, please don't top post. And use proper quoting.
temporarily rejected after DATA: failed to expand ACL string ${if
or
{{eq {$sender_address_domain}{hb.se}} {={$message_size}{100k}}}
{0}{1}}: integer expected but
Quoting Magnus Holmgren:
I hate to say I knew it... but, I knew it. :)
I'm not sure exactly what you knew, but ...
I hate it even more to say I only thought I knew it. Thanks for your
thorough investigation of this problem. Strange that nobody using the
snapshots (including me) stumbled over
Quoting Mostafa M.Fouad:
Please quote properly and don't top post (see mailing list etiquette and
e.g. http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html).
execuse me
can u please show me example
if $acl_m_spam_score contains (++ # 10
then seen finish
elif $acl_m_spam_score contains
Quoting Joachim Boltz:
due to privacy issues I want to strip the IP address of authenticated
change received_header_text to your needs.
I do this to remove the EHLO [pri.vate.IP.address] Thunderbird uses:
received_header_text = Received: \
${if def:sender_rcvhost {from ${if
Quoting Dean Brooks:
Ok, installed 4.65 and immediately was hit with more integer
annoyances and had to downgrade back to 4.63.
1. The variable $spam_score_int defaults to a blank value. Therefore,
${if {$spam_score_int}{50}}
2. Any numeric tests against ACL variables will need
Quoting Dean Brooks:
${if {${spam_score_int}0}{500}}
${if {${acl_m}0}{1000}}
I see why that works, but that is really a hack IMO. The average user,
and perhaps the more advanced user, may not see that as an obvious
way to handle it.
Right. I'm just relaying what I was told back then.
I
Quoting Magnus Holmgren:
${if {0${spam_score_int}}{50}}
It would, if it weren't that $spam_score_int can be negative (and eval
doesn't
like things like 0- either).
eval is ok, since you would only have the cases 0-123, 0 and 0123.
But better use eval10. :)
--
## List details at
Quoting Dean Brooks:
For example, the following (made-up) example will generate an error
with Exim 4.65 where it worked fine previously:
...
deny condition = ${if {$acl_m0}{0}}
As $acl_* is empty by default (unless strict_acl_vars is set, as of
4.64), you should use ${if !def:acl_m0}.
Quoting Dean Brooks:
As $acl_* is empty by default (unless strict_acl_vars is set, as of
4.64), you should use ${if !def:acl_m0}.
Wow. When was strict_acl_vars added to the spec?
In 4.64, together with the new named acl variables ($acl_c_something,
$acl_m_anything).
I see absolutely no
Quoting Kjetil Torgrim Homme:
# ip a show eth0
2: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc htb qlen 1000
link/ether 00:b0:d0:73:d5:94 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 80.53.26.122/29 scope global eth0
inet 80.53.26.124/29 scope global eth0
this looks very fishy to me. 122/29 and
Quoting Manuel Molina Cuberos:
... where the delivery should have take place in
/opt/data/mail/mailstorage02/38/1b5/380/b68bda85/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]//Maildir/.F1165853268/
Any ideas ?
Same as always: run a test delivery with
exim -d+expand+filter -bm [EMAIL PROTECTED] /some/test/message 21
Quoting Alexander Shikoff:
I know that *_data variables is used when a match in a host list in an ACL
happens as a result of a lookup. But in some cases (where lookups are
needless and lists are used) it would be great to get in some variable the
item from the list that was matched. As I
Quoting Eric Messick:
When I telnet to my own address, I get the 220 greeting immediately. When
they try the sender verify, I give them at least a 30 second delay, and they
close and fail the verify.
I have seen such behaviour with broken firewalls (somewhere on the way,
could be on yours or
Quoting Shine, Gary:
first, please read the list etiquette on
http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/MailingListEtiquette, esp. last point
thread stealing
denycondition = ${if
eq{$sender_helo_name}{{212.151.164.171}{yes}{no}}
How do I specify more IP addresses
from the spec file:
${if
Quoting David:
220 0 200***0**
EHLO [192.168.20.175]
500 unrecognized command
As others pointed out, this is because of the notorious Cisco smtp
f*ckup. As I have read a while ago, Cisco finally saw the light and
fixed it in recent software versions. Talk to your
Quoting W B Hacker:
... domain
...
...servers, services, or whatever.
Where is the 'virtual'?
Thinking of the historical meaning of a domain, where hosts in a network
are something like host.section.example.net, a
mail-/web-/$anyservice-server handling (*.)example.net (and probably
other
Quoting Philip Hazel:
But I am really interested in views as to whether doing the automatic
flush is a good idea or not.
I am also in favour of the flush-before-delay. The client will get the
responses for the previous commands, so he will have at least that, and
the server will not appear to
Quoting Matthew Hodgson:
When routing an address in a router, is there a way to store a flag in a
variable/header such that when the message is finally delivered by a
transport to one of the other recipients, the transport's behaviour can
Hm, I think address_data is separate to each
Quoting Matthew Hodgson:
ACL based verification only seems to happen currently when the MTA
receives a message through SMTP - is there a way to ensure it happens
during local submission too? I'd obviously need the same behaviour
regardless of the protocol by which the message arrived.
I
Quoting Philip Hazel:
These options are only for incoming connections. There is no specific
option for stopping the use of pipelining on outgoing connections.
...
Perhaps there should be an option specifically to turn off pipelining,
as it seems to be causing problems.
postfix has a nice
Quoting Sachin Sharma:
I am writing a file with logwrite, having following information.
...
I want somehow, this also include Name of a file, Created by transport
while delevering user's inbox i.e.
1171006621.H447180P1154.alkem.com,S=30402. Here maildir_format option is
I'd say that's not
Quoting Marco Zeni:
2007-02-14 13:52:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=static_route T=static_smtp defer
(110): Connection timed out: SMTP timeout while connected to
192.168.1.102 [192.168.1.102 after end of data (46606 bytes written)
Our internal mail server receive the email correctly and delivery
Quoting James Price:
route_data = ${lookup{$domain} mysql; select domain,route from
Only select 'route' (if it contains target.mta.host) here.
defer (-1): failed to expand ${lookup{$domain} mysql; select route from
relaydomains where domain='$domain';: unknown lookup type mysql;
A query
Quoting Mark Moseley:
Just throwing this suggestion in since you mentioned variables. It'd be nice
(and shoot me if it's already possible) to be able to set acl-style
variables on a per-recipient basis, as opposed to per-connection or
per-message only. I run into situations where I'm doing
Quoting Robert Van Horn:
The mail server handles a hundred or so domains.
Some users are aliased in the aliases file and some are
cyrus users. The owner of the company wants [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be forwarded to him. Aside from I don't like this very
much - I don't have a good idea about how
Quoting Rich, Whidbey Telecom:
Does anyone have a suggestion to tell Exim how to deliver to Topic,
even if the $local_part_suffix is topic?
Other than using a case insensitive filesystem: no, or at least nothing
nice.
Exim would have to iterate over all directories in
Quoting Mark Adams:
I have been looking around the net to try find how exactly exiscan
scores compare with spamd scores. is it just x10 as it seems to be?
Any help, or links to advice would be very much appreciated.
http://exim.org/exim-html-4.66/doc/html/spec_html/ch41.html#id2719254
says
Quoting Arthur Hagen:
says about $spam_score_int: The spam score of the message, multiplied
by ten, as an integer value.
Imprecise documentation there - is arithmetic rounding, floor, ceiling
or other method used? Will 4.95 translate to 49 or 50?
For enlightenment, try printf(%d, (int)49.5)
Quoting W B Hacker:
The 'classical' has them as subdirs under .INBOX, and/or further subdirs
under
subdirs etc. ad (some finite, but arbitrarily large, OS fs-sepcific) limit.
http://www.inter7.com/courierimap/README.maildirquota.html:
--- cut --
Can folders have subfolders, defined in a
Quoting W B Hacker:
The 'classical' has them as subdirs under .INBOX, and/or further
subdirs under subdirs etc. ad (some finite, but arbitrarily large, OS
fs-sepcific) limit.
Can folders have subfolders, defined in a recursive fashion? The answer
is no.
I'd have to re-install it to
Quoting W B Hacker:
Step two - we look at one of those above, '.Suspect' as was shown in the
screenshot:
conducive# ls -lF /data/mail/conducive.org/wbh/Maildir/.Suspect
Why are you showing this? There are no subfolders in this folder (except
the Maildir-specific cur, new and tmp, of course).
Quoting Ted Cooper:
I've played around with it a little and it seems (laughably enough),
that acl_smtp_quit is only called on ... a quit!
Works as designed, I'd say :)
Is there some way to detect a discon?
There seems to be no acl_smtp_disconnect, but as Exim detects
disconnects and logs
Quoting Paulo Andre:
Hi Renaud, I was using this system for quiet sometime and found that as
the database got bigger, then exim would use all connections to the
database, break other solutions. I tried increasing max connections and
The reason for that is obviously the blatant lack of
Quoting Arthur Hagen:
There's also a boatload of small, but legitimate businesses who, in
order to save money, make do with an ADSL line and a single IP address.
Ah, this topic again... My 2c: That's fine, if it works for them. But
the should not expect all the people they want to send mail to
Stefan Klatt wrote:
has anybody a correct transportconfiguration for maildir with the size
(S=xxx and W=xxx) at email filenames ?
I played with it a while ago, and the best I could come up with was this:
vdeliver:
driver = appendfile
maildir_format
...
use_crlf
maildir_tag =
Marc Haber wrote:
Is there anything more to it than setting the appropriate ulimit and
start an exim SMTP listener daemon? Where will exim put the core file?
Did you set /proc/sys/fs/suid_dumpable to 1 or (safer) 2?
Core dumps are created in the cwd of the process, which is exim's spool
Quoting Stefan Klatt:
Is
maildir_tag = ,S=$message_size
not enough? For maildir++ qouta it's good i think.
I guess so, if you only need it for quota, but I don't use quota, so I
don't know.
Why do you use a 2 at the beginning of you maildir_tag?
Quoting Beginner:
I have been trying to get the out-of-office message for joe. When I
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] the .forward file works. If I email
[EMAIL PROTECTED] it doesn't.
...
if personal then
http://exim.org/exim-html-4.66/doc/html/filter.html#SECTpersonal says:
The personal
Quoting jaco engelbrecht:
08:52:54 31741 expanding: ${sg{$header_X-Spammark:}{\N(\d+)\.(\d+)\N}
{\$1}}
08:52:54 31741result: 0
08:52:54 31741 0
Can anyone also please confirm if it's normal to print the result and
a newline when testing with -be?
The reason for that is just several
Carlo Wood wrote:
When called as verification from a RCPT ACL this is correct, yes.
I don't see debug output for non-verification, shouldn't the last
time it passes through the router show that the header is present?
I wonder _why_ you even want to do your routing depending on the To:
Quoting Jens Strohschnitter:
Bankverbindung:
WGZ Bank AG, Duesseldorf
(BLZ 300 600 10) Konto-Nr.: 300 011
OT: Do you really need to put your bank account details in your email
signature? Saves the phishers a job, I suppose
Yes. In germany we have to add the disclaimer to any outgoing
Quoting Lorenzo Marcantonio:
exim[1353]: 2007-04-11 15:00:00 1HbcQU-Lm-RX SMTP error from remote mail
server after RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host xxx.xxx.xxx [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]:
450 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address rejected: Greylisted, see
Quoting Laurent RISSE:
${if or {
{
${if and {{eq {${lc:$sender_helo_name}}{string2}}
{eq{$sender_host_address}{XX.XX.XX.XX}}} {true}{false}
}
${if... returns a string, but what you need is a condition. Just remove
the interior ${if...s, like that:
${if or {
{ and
Quoting Ireneusz Czajka:
I have a little problem :|
I have exim4 (4.63 from debian etch) and courier imap, and I have to
save messages sent by users into sent-items folder.
I use Maildir
I configured my MUA (Thunderbird) to bcc every message to a special
address (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Basically, if acl_m(n) could be used on a per-recipient basis - or if an
acl_r(n) for recipient was available - we could just talk to the DB once
to get all the data needed for recipient checking + routing/delivery. I
think technically this is still possible, no?
To
Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
Then, in the rcpt acl I use:
accept verify=recipient
set acl_m0 = $address_data
$address_data is per recipient, $acl_mX is per message. just use
$address_data directly :-)
I wanted to write the same, but the spec says:
In both cases (recipient and sender
Quoting Jeroen van Aart:
http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/DontObfuscate
I am sorry for not describing my exact problem. The problem is that exim
I think this was more about using 222.333.444.555 and
smtp1.mydomain.org instead of the real values.
does a dns lookup for smtp1.mydomain.org and
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
,W=vsize: vsize contains the file's RFC822.SIZE, ie. the file size with
Can we somehow get that size in exim?
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20070319/msg00166.html
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Can we somehow get that size in exim?
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20070319/msg00166.
html
Bad hacks.
Well, you asked for somehow.
New expansion variable would be nice like $message_size_rfc822.
You are free to put that on the
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
You are forced to do crlf conversion here even if message_linecount is fixed
No. Reread the archived message.
There are two independent options:
- with use_crlf, $message_size contains what you want without any
changes to exim
- without use_crlf, $message_linecount
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Multiple results are legal, but unusual. What about the wildcard?
It is legal, at least done in this way:
*.odd.example.com.IN A10.10.10.100
Which is a totally different case. It is handled by the server
internally and not part of the protocol, so the
Quoting Thomas Hochstein:
Any ideas what I've done wrong here,
Nothing. You should contact the PIX operator and ask him to disable
SMTP fixup.
FWIW JFTR: This was fixed a while ago, don't know in which version of
the PIX software. If it does not work with you, it means you have very
old
Quoting James Price:
I'm seeing these errors in my logs:
no immediate delivery: more than 10 messages received in one connection
I have what I thought was the correct setting to alleviate this problem:
smtp_accept_max_per_connection = 1000
This is only a notification. What you set is the
John Jetmore wrote:
has anyone found a clever way to detect line lengths from inside of exim?
No, but something like that might do it for you:
warn
regex = \N^.{1000,}\N
log_message = long line detected
set acl_m_longline = 1
--
## List details at
Quoting Christopher Glanville:
server_condition = ${lookup{$1}lsearch{/etc/exim/passwd.client}{${if
eq {$value }{$2}{yes}{no{no}}
Besides the issues that Philip pointed out, you will probably act as an
open relay with this config. You will authenticate anybody with an
invalid
Quoting Michael Strauss:
Why? The Regex is the same above ...
. matches everything but \n. To change that, use the s modifier:
$ exim -be
${sg{bla\nblub}{\N^.+$\N}{ersetzt}}
bla
blub
${sg{bla\nblub}{\N(?s)^.+$\N}{ersetzt}}
ersetzt
--
## List details at
alexis wrote:
server_condition = ${if and { \
{eq {${domain:$1}}{}{defaultdomain.com}} \
Um? That doesn't make any sense.
Move the default domain stuff into the query:
... domain='${quote_mysql:${if !eq {${domain:$auth1}} {}
{${domain:$auth1}} {DEFAULT_DOMAIN}}}'
(you
alexis wrote:
sounds dangerous.
What sounds dangerous? Please use proper quoting.
If you meant the sql injection stuff: Just use quote_mysql with every
externally provided string. In your query, it would be $auth1, which is
already quoted in my example for the domain part. Just do the same
Mark Smith wrote:
Are there any *valid* reasons for a mailserver's HELO greeting not matching
the hostname obtained from rDNS?
This topic comes up every now and then...
You will get (and already got) opinions in a wide range. It depends on
what you consider a *valid* reason. Fact is, there are
V. T. Mueller wrote:
In fact, I'm quite pd about folks using greylisting in a way that
SMTP callbacks are rendered useless: we reject mail temporarily
since the callback is deferred by greylisting at the sending site.
What makes you think that your FUSSP-attempt is any better than
Raphael Reich wrote:
server_condition = ${if or\
{${lookup mysql{SELECT '1' FROM users WHERE
username = '${quote_mysql:$2}' AND clear = '${quote_mysql:$3}'} {yes}{no}}}\
This would not work anyway, because or expects a condition result
(like eq, crypteq etc.) and not
Hi,
First I have to mention, that I am not a programmer or anything
similar... (I think you easyly noticed that)
You don't have to, everything is explained in the exim spec. Of course
it's easier if you have some programming experience.
Perform the sql-lookup.
If it succeeds, then give back
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
retry time not reached for any host after a long failure period
RTFF: http://exim.org/exim-html-4.50/doc/html/FAQ_6.html#TOC217
I noticed a starttls error in one of the logs. Oddly though, I don't
remember setting exim to speak via tls to MTAs - just MUAs
Philip Hazel wrote:
^(?.*)(?=abc|defg|hijkl|...)
errr... have to look up what this in detail means.
is the fastest way to match ends with abc or defg or hijkl or... because
there is no backtracking. The only restriction is that each alternative
must be of a fixed length.
so your example
Craig Jackson wrote:
{ eq{$acl_m6}{0}{1}} \
{ eq{$acl_m7}{1}{1}} \
What do you mean by that? eq takes exactly two arguments, not three.
I personally would prefer something like
{ def:acl_m6} \
{ def:acl_m7} \
...
you can (and have to) leave out the warn set acl_... then.
paul cooper wrote:
Im very new to this . Mail isnt going out from various php applicitons
send_to_gateway router
local_part=my.name domain=uni.ac.uk
calling send_to_gateway router
send_to_gateway router called for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
domain = uni.ac.uk
route_item =
paul cooper wrote:
the problem im going to have is that ts not clear to me on reading the
stuff whether there is any difference in exim receiving mail from
localhost (is this the same as 'locally hosted domains') or from the www
directed for locally hosted domains
Depends on your routers. You
Tony Marques wrote:
auto_thaw = 0s
No one should be using auto_thaw, but if you are, then set it to
That's right, but 0s is default setting, meaning it is disabled.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use
meka wrote:
What is recomended for pop3? I would like to have mailbox format
popa3d.
(easier to backup), but popa3d doesn't work on my box (FreeBSD-5.4).
oops. Doesn't work is not really a useful problem description, but
you'd better ask on the popa3d list.
Besides this, I used tpop3d
Николаев А.Г. wrote:
my $user = Exim::expand_string{'$local_part'};
my $lp = Exim::expand_string('$local_part');
What is happen with $local_part in Exim::expand_string?
I'm not using Perl in Exim, but it's obvious that the brace types don't
match ( {} vs. () ).
--
## List details at
Greg A. Woods wrote:
But I never saw a person using empty sender and cannot think of a
reason why somebody should do it.
I guess you've never seen me manually testing MTAs with telnet then!
;-)
Well, using is not testing. Anyway, I rarely use for testing, it's
only a special case.
A
Greg A. Woods wrote:
In any case the fault is not that of cPanel or its users -- the fault
lies squarely on Exim which makes it so easy for these people, i.e.
those building and/or installing cPanel, to break SMTP error
handling.
Exim is not responsible for misconfiguration by its users.
Terry Danter wrote:
Could some one give me an example acl for white listing that could be
placed at the top of my alc's
put
accept acl = whitelist
at the beginning of the ACLs you want to use this in.
I would love to include some like
sender_domains = /usr/local/etc/exim/exim.whitelist
Mike Bartmon wrote:
My goal is to have Exim receive messages but not deliver them until I
am ready for them.
Then you shouldn't have put the -q5m here:
2005-07-05 14:14:33 exim 4.33 daemon started: pid=26002, -q5m,
simply run exim -bd and exim will not do queue runs without you
telling
Elmar Leirich, CONCEPTNET GmbH wrote:
I have a Problem with Exim4 running on Debian with Mysql, Spamassassin and
ClamAV. When I try to send a mail with about 1 MB Attachment the Mailclient
(Outlook) says Sending Mail.
You are the content scan at smtp time? Scanning large mails with
Jason Martens wrote:
in ${sg {${lookup ... }} {\s+} { : } }.
Ah, ok. So the senders thing needs stuff in a list format. That little
bit of code you sent me looks like black magic. Where in the docs can I
read about how to do that?
Marc Sherman wrote:
local_parts = /etc/exim/spam_free_users
This advice is incorrect. local_parts= is not available in the DATA
Yes, of course. Sorry for the thinko...
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please
Frank S. Bernhardt wrote:
I'm getting grief from Message Labs in that they are complaining that
they are receiving a '554 SMTP synchronization error' when they do a
So they send their HELO/EHLO before getting your server's greeting.
There is a recent thread SMTP protocol violation? which
j2 wrote:
I am trying to put together a white-list for a few users, basically do an
accept of the mail based on sender-email and recipient email via an
sequential search in a flat file. But I can't get it to fly on my 4.41
installation.
put together a file with [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
201 - 300 of 482 matches
Mail list logo
