Marcus Barczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[exim] FreeBSD ffs vs. ufs?
Date: 06-07-17 12:00 am
From: Marcus Barczak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: exim-users@exim.org
[...]
I was wondering if anyone had any positive or negative experience
with using ffs+soft updates with exim on a FreeBSD system
On 2006-07-17 at 14:00 +1000, Marcus Barczak wrote:
I'm currently doing some performance tuning on a pretty heavily used
exim server we have here. We're running FreeBSD 6.1 and am noticing
the disk loading to be quite high. The filesystems are currently
configured as UFS however i'm
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Marcus Barczak wrote:
I'm currently doing some performance tuning on a pretty heavily used
exim server we have here. We're running FreeBSD 6.1 and am noticing
the disk loading to be quite high. The filesystems are currently
configured as UFS however i'm contemplating
Hi Exim Folks,
I'm currently doing some performance tuning on a pretty heavily used
exim server we have here. We're running FreeBSD 6.1 and am noticing
the disk loading to be quite high. The filesystems are currently
configured as UFS however i'm contemplating using tunefs to switch
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 02:00:11PM +1000, Marcus Barczak wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had any positive or negative experience
with using ffs+soft updates with exim on a FreeBSD system? I
understand the risk of losing data in the event of a power failure
(soft updates not being
Avleen Vig wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 02:00:11PM +1000, Marcus Barczak wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had any positive or negative experience
with using ffs+soft updates with exim on a FreeBSD system? I
understand the risk of losing data in the event of a power failure
(soft
