Marcin Gryszkalis wrote:
Hi
I have problem with routing from authenticated user to the outside.
Sender envelope address gets qualified twice, like:
2008-06-20 05:04:08 1K9Wv2-000Alo-Lx = [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[QD] H=[SH]
[217.113.238.142] U=nobody P=esmtpsa X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256
Marcin Gryszkalis [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fr 20 Jun 2008 05:24:06 CEST):
Hi
I have problem with routing from authenticated user to the outside.
Sender envelope address gets qualified twice, like:
2008-06-20 05:04:08 1K9Wv2-000Alo-Lx = [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[QD] H=[SH]
[217.113.238.142] U=nobody
On Friday of June 20 2008, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Check your config around control = submission, and read the spec about
submission mode, $authenticated_id, and retain_sender.
Yes, you're right, control=submission was the problem, Ted Cooped pointed also
to recent thread with same issue.
Hello,
Exim uses real PCRE; Philip Hazel is the original author of both.
.*\nX-purgate-ID: (.*?)\n.*
whereas $1 would contain the id. Unfortunately, the sg expansion item
does seem to work with newlines.
If you double-check the documentation on ${sg ...} then you'll see the
reminder:
On 2008-06-20 at 14:48 +0200, Marten Lehmann wrote:
I read this, but I don't understand where is the difference wether \n is
expanded by exim to a newline (without using \N or using \\n) or using
\N so PCRE transforms \n to a newline.
In this case, not much. Just be sure to also use \$
On 2008-06-20 at 00:07 -0400, Eli C wrote:
Do you have an example of this?
I have a rather complex setup for my laptop. It does this and more.
Details below. Used on MacOS.
And thanks for the tip about checking for TLS if using auth PLAIN. Does
$tls_cipher count SSL connections as well? A
On 2008-06-20 at 20:46 -0700, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2008-06-20 at 00:07 -0400, Eli C wrote:
Do you have an example of this?
I have a rather complex setup for my laptop. It does this and more.
For the specific example of 'this' cited, yes, it does that and more.
It doesn't switch based on
