On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 21:48 +0200, Mark Elkins wrote:
Is anyone looking at having Exim become DNSSEC aware - look at the AD
bit - stuff like that. Perhaps add the DNS Status as a mail header? - or
as a variable so that tests can be done?
The root gets signed by the end of the year.
just
Hello Phil,
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2009-07-14 at 17:25 +0200, Lutz Preßler wrote:
dest_a:
driver = manualroute
domains = example.com
condition = ${lookup ldapm{..URL..}{yes}{no}}
route_list = * host_a bydns
transport = internal_smtp
dest_b:
...
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }
Hi,
Is there a way for exim to choose the outgoing IP address based on
the sender domain?
Thanks in advance,
Edd Smith
-
Msg sent via Hequet - http://www.hequet.net/
What's wrong here:
2009-07-13 14:35:32 H=(localhost.localdomain) [127.0.0.1] sender verify
defer for ndbeck...@gmail.com: host lookup for smtp.hns.com did not
complete (DNS timeout?)
2009-07-13 14:35:32 H=(localhost.localdomain) [127.0.0.1]
F=ndbeck...@gmail.com temporarily rejected RCPT
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }
Hi,
In the case of a message size of 1x with n recipients, the ratelimit
per_byte counts 1x instead of n*1x. Am I missing something?
Thanks in advance,
Edd Smith
-
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 13:09 +1000, Ted Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 21:48 +0200, Mark Elkins wrote:
Is anyone looking at having Exim become DNSSEC aware - look at the AD
bit - stuff like that. Perhaps add the DNS Status as a mail header? - or
as a variable so that tests can be done?
On 2009-07-15 at 07:53 +0200, Lutz Preßler wrote:
That's why multiple routers can route the same destination domain - which
works, of course. But if the lookup times out in the first router
while figuring out if it should handle this local part, the message
is deferred immediately without
Hello,
System Administrator sysad...@hequet.net (Di 14 Jul 2009 18:59:49 CEST):
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }
Hi,
Is there a way for exim to choose the outgoing IP address based on
the sender domain?
The SMTP transport has a private
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2009-07-15 at 07:53 +0200, Lutz Preßler wrote:
[...]
works, of course. But if the lookup times out in the first router
while figuring out if it should handle this local part, the message
is deferred immediately without doing the lookups in the
Due to privacy issues I want to change IP address of some users from the
received header to 127.0.0.1. I want to make it only for some users. I have
found received_header_text variable, but I do not understand how to change
this variable for defined users. Thanks.
--
View this message in
Should there be a BOF/open session on exim maintainance -- which is decidedly
down since Phil retired ?
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT
Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/
Parliament Hill Computers Ltd.
--On 14 July 2009 08:36:49 -0400 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
What's wrong here:
2009-07-13 14:35:32 H=(localhost.localdomain) [127.0.0.1] sender verify
defer for ndbeck...@gmail.com: host lookup for smtp.hns.com did not
complete (DNS timeout?)
Beats me. Why would a sender
--On 15 July 2009 07:28:57 -0400 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 15 July 2009, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 14 July 2009 08:36:49 -0400 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
What's wrong here:
2009-07-13 14:35:32 H=(localhost.localdomain) [127.0.0.1] sender verify
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 10:45 +0200, Mark Elkins wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 13:09 +1000, Ted Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 21:48 +0200, Mark Elkins wrote:
Is anyone looking at having Exim become DNSSEC aware - look at the AD
bit - stuff like that. Perhaps add the DNS Status as a
Hi,
I think it is possible for Exim to route e-mails to smart hosts - SMTP
servers it authenticates to with username and password (like if it was a
client).
When I create a special route for these to-be-routed e-mails, is it
possible to create the route based on the FROM address of the
Sebastian Lohmeier wrote:
I think it is possible for Exim to route e-mails to smart hosts - SMTP
servers it authenticates to with username and password (like if it was a
client).
When I create a special route for these to-be-routed e-mails, is it
possible to create the route based on
Jonny_77, 2009-07-15 10:18:
Due to privacy issues I want to change IP address of some users from the
received header to 127.0.0.1. I want to make it only for some users. I have
found received_header_text variable, but I do not understand how to change
this variable for defined users. Thanks.
Hello Sebastian,
Sebastian Lohmeier sebast...@monochromata.de (Mi 15 Jul 2009 14:59:41 CEST):
Hi,
I think it is possible for Exim to route e-mails to smart hosts - SMTP
servers it authenticates to with username and password (like if it was a
client).
When I create a special route for
Hello,
Mike Cardwell exim-us...@lists.grepular.com (Mi 15 Jul 2009 15:29:45 CEST):
Sebastian Lohmeier wrote:
I think it is possible for Exim to route e-mails to smart hosts - SMTP
servers it authenticates to with username and password (like if it was a
client).
When I create a
Ted Cooper wrote:
So I had a little bit of a browse around and it seems that Postfix and
Sendmail have DNSSEC support where they wont deliver outbound email to
fraudulently signed MX records which specify verification is required.
This is rather puzzling since I was under the impression that
20 matches
Mail list logo
