Greg Meyer wrote:
On Monday 01 September 2003 03:13 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
I was the one who asked the question about slow transfers using Samba.
I asked on this list and on the newbie list. Still have not received
any answers resolving the issue.
When a transfer to or from a Samba
On Monday September 1 2003 04:46 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 01 Sep 2003 10:29 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
Anne, 'dmidecode' (as root) will tell you what voltage the
AGP slot has, among other bios settings. EG (excerpt from
mine),
Handle 0x001B
DMI type 9, 13 bytes.
On Monday 01 September 2003 03:48 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Monday 01 September 2003 03:13 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
I was the one who asked the question about slow transfers using Samba.
I asked on this list and on the newbie list. Still have not received
any
On Monday 01 September 2003 01:17 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:47, Niclas Jacobsson wrote:
Hi all!
I am co-using mouse and monitor with an MS XP Home Client through one
of those mechanical switchboxes. XPH manages to loose mouse and get
it back working after
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:01:23 -0700
lorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 September 2003 01:17 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:47, Niclas Jacobsson wrote:
Hi all!
I am co-using mouse and monitor with an MS XP Home Client
through one of those mechanical
Well, I just received a heads up from my isp provider -- seems that there
has been some naughtiness (?) going on here.. dunno what to do to fix it.
It seems there have been some pings/icmp activity from my system to some
other system on the local tsoft network. I can't find anything in my logs
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 18:19:24 -0700
dfox [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Well, I just received a heads up from my isp provider -- seems that
there has been some naughtiness (?) going on here.. dunno what to do
to fix it.
It seems there have been some pings/icmp activity from my system to
some
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 13:08, James Sparenberg wrote:
...
I like Todd's method rpm -e msec --nodeps and then put it into the urpmi
skip list *grin*
James
...
It's got its uses, but I agree that the right mistake with msec can
royally screw a system. Of course, that's Unix for you; most
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 14:59, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
*** James Sparenberg Mon, 01 Sep 2003 13:27:29 -0700 :
All,
There is an interesting discussion on pclinuxoneline.com
(texstar's
site.) Dealing with the upgrade cycle and some people wondering if the
9.1 to 9.2 upgrade is
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 14:21, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to get my wlan card to work in my laptop.
It's a sweex pcmcia card with rtl8180 chip.
Now realtek offers download for drivers but not specifically for the mdk
kernel (I'm using the stock 2.4.21-0.13mdk with 9.1).
The
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 18:10, Jack Coates wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 13:08, James Sparenberg wrote:
...
I like Todd's method rpm -e msec --nodeps and then put it into the urpmi
skip list *grin*
James
Wh? Uninstall msec??? It's a GREAT tool. I'm glad Mandrake
includes it.
How many people here can successfully create a boot disk under 9.1 or
9.2 using mkbootdisk and a 1.4 meg floppy?
LX
--
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1 Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 19:28, chort wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 18:10, Jack Coates wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 13:08, James Sparenberg wrote:
...
I like Todd's method rpm -e msec --nodeps and then put it into the urpmi
skip list *grin*
James
Wh? Uninstall msec???
*** James Sparenberg Mon, 01 Sep 2003 19:09:21 -0700 :
I know the discussion. And this isn't in the same vein. It's
taking
on a much more logical attitude. One of the things being talked
about is something like pushing urpmi and it's usage as an upgrade
tool to the forefront.
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 19:09, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 14:59, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
*** James Sparenberg Mon, 01 Sep 2003 13:27:29 -0700 :
All,
There is an interesting discussion on pclinuxoneline.com
(texstar's
site.) Dealing with the upgrade
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 15:53, David E. Fox wrote:
What would cause the following - other than hardware issues - I've only
seen this type of behavior a log time ago when I had intermittent power
to my HD drives.
And that was with an older system.
hardware -- overheating, low power, gremlins.
Say hi to Mike for me :-)
this is the same box with the ps problems, right? Put the latest
checkrootkit on a write-protected floppy and run it on there, I think
you might have a visitor.
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 18:19, dfox wrote:
Well, I just received a heads up from my isp provider -- seems
Seems like this is related to the stuff discussed in
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321169 and possibly
in http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321098 .
You may also want to try running regedit to do the following:
go to
Hi,
This question started actually in the newbie mailing list but it may be
more appropriate for the expert list.
I setup my machine with security level 4 but I am interested in
relaxing some of the permission settings. I made changes to
/etc/security/msec/perm.local and then executed msec.
hardware -- overheating, low power, gremlins.
Well, it was gremlins in the other system -- actually the power cable to the
drives was a bit flaky, so anything that would access the drive (ex. df, ls,
etc.) would hang, with a corresponding linear increase in the overall
load average.
This time,
looked like most of the crew doesn't realize you can upgrade with
urpmi:-)
whatever. I'll upgrade a few weeks after release and hopefully swsusp
will start to work on my Vaio laptop.
A lot of people have complained of problems while upgrading. Is this not
an issue anymore?
eric
--
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 19:48, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 19:28, chort wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 18:10, Jack Coates wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 13:08, James Sparenberg wrote:
...
I like Todd's method rpm -e msec --nodeps and then put it into the urpmi
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 20:36, Eric Huff wrote:
looked like most of the crew doesn't realize you can upgrade with
urpmi:-)
whatever. I'll upgrade a few weeks after release and hopefully swsusp
will start to work on my Vaio laptop.
A lot of people have complained of problems while
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 20:11, Avi Schwartz wrote:
Hi,
This question started actually in the newbie mailing list but it may be
more appropriate for the expert list.
I setup my machine with security level 4 but I am interested in
relaxing some of the permission settings. I made changes to
On 01 Sep 2003 20:52:45 -0700
Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
I haven't had problems with 8.2 to 9.0 or 9.0 to 9.1
Even more,
Just keeps gettin' better an' better...
Well, Ok , supermount, but that goes without saying.
What 'av the Romans ever done fer us?!
--
HaywireMac
On Monday, Sep 1, 2003, at 22:55 America/Chicago, Jack Coates wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 20:11, Avi Schwartz wrote:
Hi,
This question started actually in the newbie mailing list but it may
be
more appropriate for the expert list.
I setup my machine with security level 4 but I am interested
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 21:06, Avi Schwartz wrote:
...
puzzling. Seems like a bug -- I can only assume that I've made my
changes manually and then altered perm.local so they'll stick,
otherwise
I should have seen this too.
Then there is something else going on since I also did the
Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
How many people here can successfully create a boot disk under 9.1 or
9.2 using mkbootdisk and a 1.4 meg floppy?
LX
Problems, here. I usually fdformat /dev/fd0 as normal user but, in 9.2
rc1, it seems I have to umount /mnt/floppy, as root, first.
Kernel-2.4.22-1mdk. In 9.1,
Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
How many people here can successfully create a boot disk under 9.1 or
9.2 using mkbootdisk and a 1.4 meg floppy?
Success: once on a non-SCSI 9.1 system
Failure: 6-8 times on SCSI (53c8xx) 9.1 9.2rc1 systems (out of space)
--
...[B]e quick to listen, slow to speak and
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 20:46, chort wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 19:48, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 19:28, chort wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 18:10, Jack Coates wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 13:08, James Sparenberg wrote:
...
I like Todd's method rpm -e
What 'av the Romans ever done fer us?!
Trippy. We just watched the old Trek where they encountered The Romans
in the 20th century.
--
Mandrake HowTo's More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
A lot of people have complained of problems while upgrading. Is this
not an issue anymore?
I haven't had problems with 8.2 to 9.0 or 9.0 to 9.1
Interesting. You said you upgraded with urpmi. Does that mean you
didn't do an install and choose upgrade, but let urpmi do the work?
Either
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 22:19, Eric Huff wrote:
A lot of people have complained of problems while upgrading. Is this
not an issue anymore?
I haven't had problems with 8.2 to 9.0 or 9.0 to 9.1
Interesting. You said you upgraded with urpmi. Does that mean you
didn't do an install and
Either way, what is the best way to upgrade? I started at 9.1, so
i've never encounter this choice before...
The beginnings of a tutorial is here.
http://pclinuxonline.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlethold=-1mode=flatorder=1sid=7018#32054
Thanks! I added it to our TWiki under
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 22:55, Eric Huff wrote:
Either way, what is the best way to upgrade? I started at 9.1, so
i've never encounter this choice before...
The beginnings of a tutorial is here.
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 04:12, James Sparenberg wrote:
2 questions
1. Do you know what the driver should be.
No not really, I'm supposing (going by the readme that comes with the realtek
download) the module is rtl8180_24x.o which is part of the download.
if it doesn't work as
Hello!
I just upgraded one comp from 9.0 to 9.1. Did clean install, everything OK,
except for that KDE apps crash everytime I try to print. Tried it with KMail,
Konqueror, KOffice. Printer setup utility of KDE Control Panel crashed as
well, when I tried to take a look at settings.
Apps show
On Monday 01 Sep 2003 10:54 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
Failed. It crashes kmail. I tried to create a new folder in
Maildir format, delete it, create a symlink by the same name to
/dev/null. I then tried to move an email in one of my other
folders into the new /dev/null folder...it crashes
On Tuesday 02 Sep 2003 3:46 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
How many people here can successfully create a boot disk under 9.1
or 9.2 using mkbootdisk and a 1.4 meg floppy?
Under 9.1 I used the gui with success.
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
On Monday 01 Sep 2003 4:54 pm, Larry Sword wrote:
Anne,
There are numerous settings you can make to the page and in the
print settings.
File-Page Setup - Format Options, Margins Headers/Footer.
Try playing around with these and then use the File-Print preview
to check the page.
Oh yes,
On Tuesday 02 Sep 2003 7:39 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 22:55, Eric Huff wrote:
Either way, what is the best way to upgrade? I started at
9.1, so i've never encounter this choice before...
The beginnings of a tutorial is here.
On Monday 01 Sep 2003 6:18 pm, Mark wrote:
Hi List,
I've forgotten how to do something that I used to know how to do.
That is, using cat to combine a list of files into one single file.
The problem:
the list of files below, I would like to combine into just one
file. les_csharp_12_p1.pdf
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 12:00:15 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I just upgraded one comp from 9.0 to 9.1. Did clean install,
everything OK, except for that KDE apps crash everytime I try to
print. Tried it with KMail, Konqueror, KOffice. Printer setup utility
of KDE Control Panel crashed
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 23:00, Jack Coates wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 15:53, David E. Fox wrote:
What would cause the following - other than hardware issues - I've only
seen this type of behavior a log time ago when I had intermittent power
to my HD drives.
And that was with an older
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 12:46 pm, many eyes noted that Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
How many people here can successfully create a boot disk under 9.1 or
9.2 using mkbootdisk and a 1.4 meg floppy?
LX
Define successful?
Boots the system with some problems identifying the CD ROM as an SCSI device
with
Hi, Angelo.
In Mozilla, when I try to change the margin from
0.5 to 1.0 it
simply jumps back to 0.5. I haven't tried running
it is root - I
wonder if it would help - I'll try, in case it's a
permission
problem. I do think, though, that in older versions
I could change
it there, so
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
How many people here can successfully create a boot disk under 9.1 or
9.2 using mkbootdisk and a 1.4 meg floppy?
LX
Well...when I first loaded 9.1 thats how I had to do it to get a boot
floppy.
--
Mark
If necessity is the mother of
Hi all,
is it me or has anyone else noticed that its next to impossible to
navigate the Mandrake website. I've been trying unsuccessfully to get to
the mailing list archives now for about an hour and either get a
connection denied back from their web server, or it just sits there and
goes
Am Dienstag, 2. September 2003 16:54 schrieb Mark:
Hi all,
is it me or has anyone else noticed that its next to impossible to
navigate the Mandrake website. I've been trying unsuccessfully to get
to the mailing list archives now for about an hour and either get a
connection denied back from
Get a router/NAT/firewall that enables spoof protection.
Well, yep. I was hoping for something I could do in software to detect
and or stop this gremlin.
HaywireMac
David E. Fox Thanks for
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 22:19, Eric Huff wrote:
A lot of people have complained of problems while upgrading. Is this
not an issue anymore?
I haven't had problems with 8.2 to 9.0 or 9.0 to 9.1
Interesting. You said you upgraded with urpmi. Does that mean you
didn't do an install and
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Am Dienstag, 2. September 2003 16:54 schrieb Mark:
Hi all,
is it me or has anyone else noticed that its next to impossible to
navigate the Mandrake website. I've been trying unsuccessfully to get
to the mailing list archives now for about an
Define successful?
Doing it without running out of disk space would be successful. Of course,
if it actually boots the right partition it would be even better.
I've been able to do this in 9.0. LX and I hashed over this; it seems
that the kernels are SoBig :) now that there's not enough room
Mark wrote:
is it me or has anyone else noticed that its next to impossible to
navigate the Mandrake website. I've been trying unsuccessfully to get to
the mailing list archives now for about an hour and either get a
connection denied back from their web server, or it just sits there and
On Tuesday 02 Sep 2003 12:14 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
Yes, sorry. I'm so use to always havin it installed I didn't
think, lm_sensors-2.8.0-4mdk. Just 'urpmi lm_sensors' I believe
it's been included for some time, so an older lm_sensors package
will probly work too. It's on your CD's
OK
Am Dienstag, 2. September 2003 17:29 schrieb Mark:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Am Dienstag, 2. September 2003 16:54 schrieb Mark:
Hi all,
is it me or has anyone else noticed that its next to impossible
to navigate the Mandrake website. I've been trying unsuccessfully
I'm using a MS Intellimouse(with ball) on MDK 9.0. It's currently identified
as the following in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4:
Section InputDevice
Identifier Mouse1
Driver mouse
Option Protocol IMPS/2
Option Device /dev/psaux
Option ZAxisMapping 4 5
EndSection
And works just fine.
I made a similar change and it was just power down change and powerup
no big deal.
if you need to make any changes though it should prompt you during boot
up or you can after through the control tool mcc . ( Mandrake Control
Center )
James Conner wrote:
I'm using a MS Intellimouse(with
On Monday 01 September 2003 08:10 pm, Michael Viron wrote:
Seems like this is related to the stuff discussed in
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321169 and possibly
in http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321098 .
You may also want to try running
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 03:40 am, James Conner wrote:
I'm using a MS Intellimouse(with ball) on MDK 9.0. It's currently
identified as the following in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4:
Section InputDevice
Identifier Mouse1
Driver mouse
Option Protocol IMPS/2
Option Device
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 10:51, Mark wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
How many people here can successfully create a boot disk under 9.1 or
9.2 using mkbootdisk and a 1.4 meg floppy?
LX
Well...when I first loaded 9.1 thats how I had to do it to get a boot
lorne wrote:
On Monday 01 September 2003 08:10 pm, Michael Viron wrote:
Seems like this is related to the stuff discussed in
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321169 and possibly
in http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321098 .
You may also want to try
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 01:44 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
The same thing can be said for transfers between Linux and Linux. It
experiences the same crippled transfer speed. The common thread being
the transfer is initiated on a Linux box.
Missed the first part of this thread, but the
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 10:44 am, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
This illustrates my point perfectly. When you initiated the transfer on
the Linux box it took around two minutes to do the transfer, and you
called it fast (blast). I repeated that behavior in my own setup. I
got the same
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 10:44, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
lorne wrote:
On Monday 01 September 2003 08:10 pm, Michael Viron wrote:
Seems like this is related to the stuff discussed in
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321169 and possibly
in
Mates:
Here is another clue that may help get to the bottom of this. Back in
the 7.2 days when Samba 2.0X, 2.1X was comming out, the slow transfer issue
appeared with Win98 transfers. The 2 gig limit was also there. The slow
transfer from win to mdk was discussed as a packet fragmentation or
Brian wrote:
Remember though, this particular network is on a HUB, i.e. half-duplex.
If there is any other sort of traffic what-so-ever it's going to be
noticeably slower (DNS lookups, Net-BT broadcasts, etc).
Brings up a good point. Specifically, how many hubs are we talking
about? Are
For what it's worth, here is more info than needed on smb and CIFS.
http://ubiqx.org/cifs/index.html#Contents
--
David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E.
RANKIN * BERTIN, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
(936) 715-9333
(936) 715-9339 fax
--
- Original Message -
From: David Rankin
From: David Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For what it's worth, here is more info than needed on smb and CIFS.
http://ubiqx.org/cifs/index.html#Contents
Just an update for you all...
upcoming MDK 9.2 has cifs support in both kernel and
Samba 2.2.x / 3.x ...
Thomas
Want to buy your Pack
chort wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 10:44, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
lorne wrote:
On Monday 01 September 2003 08:10 pm, Michael Viron wrote:
Seems like this is related to the stuff discussed in
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321169 and possibly
in
Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 01:44 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
The same thing can be said for transfers between Linux and Linux. It
experiences the same crippled transfer speed. The common thread being
the transfer is initiated on a Linux box.
Missed the first
lorne wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 10:44 am, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
This illustrates my point perfectly. When you initiated the transfer on
the Linux box it took around two minutes to do the transfer, and you
called it fast (blast). I repeated that behavior in my own setup. I
got
Hi all,
Is anyone else seeing this happen? What I mean is the system boots just
fine to the GUI login screen, but after I've logged out of my Xwindows
session it doesn't remain in init 5, but drops to init 3, and the console
login appears. In order to get the GUI login screen back I've got to
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 02:22 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
When I initiate a transfer on a Linux (Samba) box to or from another
Linux(Samba) box, or to or from a Windows box, I get 3-4 meg/s
tranfers. This is the one I'm trying to fix.
Yep, that definitely seems slow to me. Isn't there
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 11:14 am, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
lorne wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 10:44 am, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
This illustrates my point perfectly. When you initiated the transfer on
the Linux box it took around two minutes to do the transfer, and you
called it
Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 02:22 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
When I initiate a transfer on a Linux (Samba) box to or from another
Linux(Samba) box, or to or from a Windows box, I get 3-4 meg/s
tranfers. This is the one I'm trying to fix.
Yep, that definitely
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 11:09 am, chort wrote:
Remember though, this particular network is on a HUB, i.e. half-duplex.
If there is any other sort of traffic what-so-ever it's going to be
noticeably slower (DNS lookups, Net-BT broadcasts, etc).
Agreed. First thing I looked for in the
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 12:41 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Remember though, this particular network is on a HUB, i.e. half-duplex.
If there is any other sort of traffic what-so-ever it's going to be
noticeably slower (DNS lookups, Net-BT broadcasts, etc).
Who's network?
Just a simple
lorne wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 11:14 am, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
lorne wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 10:44 am, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
This illustrates my point perfectly. When you initiated the transfer on
the Linux box it took around two minutes to do the
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 11:27 am, David Rankin wrote:
Mates:
Here is another clue that may help get to the bottom of this. Back in
the 7.2 days when Samba 2.0X, 2.1X was comming out, the slow transfer issue
appeared with Win98 transfers. The 2 gig limit was also there. The slow
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 11:36 am, David Rankin wrote:
Brian wrote:
Remember though, this particular network is on a HUB, i.e. half-duplex.
If there is any other sort of traffic what-so-ever it's going to be
noticeably slower (DNS lookups, Net-BT broadcasts, etc).
Brings up a good
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 12:13 pm, Thomas Backlund wrote:
From: David Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For what it's worth, here is more info than needed on smb and CIFS.
http://ubiqx.org/cifs/index.html#Contents
Just an update for you all...
upcoming MDK 9.2 has cifs support in both
Mark wrote:
Hi all,
Is anyone else seeing this happen? What I mean is the system boots just
fine to the GUI login screen, but after I've logged out of my Xwindows
session it doesn't remain in init 5, but drops to init 3, and the console
login appears. In order to get the GUI login screen back
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 01:46 pm, lorne wrote:
Okay,
Maybe a small breakthrough. I transfered the same file both ways. I've not
even analyzed it yet, but there is 25% more frames total (without
subtracting arps or anything) in the slow than the fast! Not sure yet what
else I'll dig
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 02:04 pm, lorne wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 01:46 pm, lorne wrote:
Okay,
Maybe a small breakthrough. I transfered the same file both ways. I've not
even analyzed it yet, but there is 25% more frames total (without
subtracting arps or anything) in the
See http://www.speedguide.net/read_articles.php?id=157
--
David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E.
RANKIN * BERTIN, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
(936) 715-9333
(936) 715-9339 fax
--
- Original Message -
From: lorne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 02:40 pm, David Rankin wrote:
See http://www.speedguide.net/read_articles.php?id=157
What is odd about this web site is that even though it says 2000/XP...
virtually all the settings are specific to XP. XP doesn't have those key
settings. ?? I doubt I want to add
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 03:26 pm, lorne wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 02:40 pm, David Rankin wrote:
See http://www.speedguide.net/read_articles.php?id=157
What is odd about this web site is that even though it says 2000/XP...
virtually all the settings are specific to XP. XP
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 03:29 pm, lorne wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 03:26 pm, lorne wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 02:40 pm, David Rankin wrote:
See http://www.speedguide.net/read_articles.php?id=157
I DID go to a web site to download tweaks. There was a little executable
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 10:54 am, Mark wrote:
Hi all,
is it me or has anyone else noticed that its next to impossible to
navigate the Mandrake website. I've been trying unsuccessfully to get to
the mailing list archives now for about an hour and either get a
connection denied back from
Lorne
You got me?? Beyond some tangential knowledge of the past packet
fragmentation issue and the CIFS protocol, I don't have any rabbits to pull
out of my hat. As far as smb is concerned it seems M$'s implementation of
smb(CIFS) is new and unique to XP/2000. I suspect in implementing CIFS for
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 04:44 pm, Mark wrote:
Hi all,
Is anyone else seeing this happen? What I mean is the system boots just
fine to the GUI login screen, but after I've logged out of my Xwindows
session it doesn't remain in init 5, but drops to init 3, and the console
login
To combine multiple files into one just do the following:
cat file1 file2 file3 newfile
Mile
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 01 Sep 2003 6:18 pm, Mark wrote:
Hi List,
I've forgotten how to do something that I used to know how to do.
That is, using cat to combine a list of files into one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Joeb wrote:
Mark wrote:
Hi all,
Is anyone else seeing this happen? What I mean is the system boots just
fine to the GUI login screen, but after I've logged out of my Xwindows
session it doesn't remain in init 5, but
hello everybody,
i have my mdk9.1 box security level set on standard.
now, i want to be able to connect with ssh or telnet to this box from another
one in my lan.
the connections are refused...
where do i have to make the changes to allow this ?
tnx greetings,
stu
Want to buy your Pack or
elPunishar wrote:
hello everybody,
i have my mdk9.1 box security level set on standard.
now, i want to be able to connect with ssh or telnet to this box from another
one in my lan.
the connections are refused...
where do i have to make the changes to allow this ?
Assuming that sshd is
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 06:23 pm, David Rankin wrote:
Lorne
You got me?? Beyond some tangential knowledge of the past packet
fragmentation issue and the CIFS protocol, I don't have any rabbits to pull
out of my hat. As far as smb is concerned it seems M$'s implementation of
smb(CIFS) is
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 04:14:18 +0200
elPunishar [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
i have my mdk9.1 box security level set on standard.
now, i want to be able to connect with ssh or telnet to this box from
another one in my lan.
the connections are refused...
where do i have to make the changes to
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 04:14:18 +0200
elPunishar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello everybody,
i have my mdk9.1 box security level set on standard.
now, i want to be able to connect with ssh or telnet to this box from
another one in my lan.
the connections are refused...
where do i have to make
Anne Wilson wrote:
Hi, Mark. I've been following this, and it doesn't look promising, so
I wonder if it's time for a dirty solution. Could you not pdf2ps all
the files, open them in SOWriter, then cut and paste into one file,
save that as a new pdf?
I know it's not elegant, but it
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
