Hey fellas,
I wonder, since I am having trouble with my zip250 scsi drive,
(slow to mount and umount) is this related??
Can I get a newer (or older) version of the aic7xxx module?
Thanks
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 08:10 am, so spoke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I did, sort of. It turns out that the
For me Mandrake 8 performs good for the most part,
I have been testing the poop out of it to get it to misbehave,
and the only fatal thing that I found that happens,
is that when you try to set up your /usr/bin/ktalkdlg
in the control center under Network and then Talk configuration,
the whole
Whoa, do you think I should move to IBM drives now?
I hear that they are good but I did not know that about the
Quantum ones!---Whoa.
On Thursday 26 April 2001 05:02 am, so spoke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quantum and Maxtor are now one, though you can still differentiate which
drive line belongs
I personally prefer Quantum hard drives, although I have not had
any maxtors or WD, I know about IBM and Quantums being
good linux drives.
On Tuesday 24 April 2001 11:11 pm, so spoke Dan Swartzendruber:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Mark Weaver wrote:
Todd...
What's wrong with Maxtor? Thats what
I agree, I can't even burn the dang iso image, this sucks, Beavis uhh huh huh.
both xcdroast and eroaster said:
Warning: creating filesystem that does not conform to ISO-9660.
Cdrecord 1.9 (i586-mandrake-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2000 Jörg Schilling
TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM
scsidev: '1,0,0'
Hello all
Does anyone know of a way to download and save files in the
rtsp or pnm:// type scheme?
Lynx can't do it, netscape nor konq, I wish to know of a way
to just download and save files from these tyupes of servers.
Thank you
Cool, hey if anyone tries it out, would someone tell me
if its worth upgrading to or not and why?
Thanks
On Thursday 19 April 2001 01:45 pm, so spoke Charles A Edwards:
8.0 has been uploaded to many of the ftp mirrors, though not all as of yet.
2 sites that do have it are:
So does this mean that the next ver of Mandrake will
install on my AMDK6-400 without any trouble just like
7.2 ?
If not I will be VERY upset
On Friday 30 March 2001 12:51 am, so spoke David Rankin:
"Jose M. Sanchez" wrote:
To begin with, this is not a Mandrake issue, it's a Linux issue.
Its ok to have the i686 rpms in the version, just don't (whoever)
remove the i586 ones, just add the i686 and leave
the i586 IN there so one can install it on either machine
and then everyone will be happy and the
version won't give you any poop about installing, it will
just install with no
HEAR!! HEAR!!!
Well spoken!
On Wednesday 28 March 2001 07:39 pm, so spoke Digital Wokan:
We've lost sight of one of my original points in similar discussions.
If Mandrake is a Pentium optimized distro and NOT a P2+ optimized
distro, then i686 RPM's HAVE NO PLACE in the distro. Period.
Stop, Mandrake!!!
You can't do that!!
I still have a AMD K6 I need you guys to leave the i586
rpms IN the installation!!
and I don't have the money to just go get a new i686 machine.
Please do not exclude the i586 rpms from newer versions.
I want to stay with Mandrake, I would hate to
O COOL
So there are two ways to do it, that rocks thanx for the extra
info.
On Saturday 24 March 2001 09:26 pm, so spoke Jerry Sternesky:
You can do an rpm -Uvh on the package and it will install the source to
/usr/source/RPMS. Then to build it go into /usr/source/RPMS/SPECS
Then rpm
I have always thought it was "civil-me" as well and until
I read how it was pronounced, the Turkish way and all.
Good to know, I like learning new languages.
I guess I just accepted it as I saw it, I know kind of
childish, but thats how I am.
hehe
Cool
On Sunday 25 March 2001 07:43 am, so
Hello.
I am considering upgrading my sound card from
AWE64 ISA to the SBLive Platinum.
Does the wavetable midi still sound as good
(or better) than the old awe64 or does it
even use the same kind of synth?
I should have asked if it works with
linux to begin with in the first place sorry.
If
14 matches
Mail list logo
