On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 08:47, Brian Parish wrote:
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 08:51, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
Fixing a vfat drive from
inside linux (a truly unbiased/independent/seperate standpoint) has
definite advantages. The only reason I stop short of using the
adjective superior is because I
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 08:51, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
Fixing a vfat drive from
inside linux (a truly unbiased/independent/seperate standpoint) has
definite advantages. The only reason I stop short of using the
adjective superior is because I haven't conducted rigorous tests to
back that view up.
Hi all,
I share a disk with a M$ OS I seldom use. This disk holds a vfat32
partition.
Since I nearly allways use my md8.1 and this partition is mounted
automatically it should be checked.
I don't think the rc.sysinit file takes this into account, it's to say
that this calls fsck via Fsck and
Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 15:20, Guy Zelck wrote:
Hi all,
I share a disk with a M$ OS I seldom use. This disk holds a vfat32
partition.
Since I nearly allways use my md8.1 and this partition is mounted
automatically it should be checked.
I don't think the rc.sysinit file
Hi all,
I share a disk with a M$ OS I seldom use. This disk holds a vfat32
partition.
Since I nearly allways use my md8.1 and this partition is mounted
automatically it should be checked.
I don't think the rc.sysinit file takes this into account, it's to say
that this calls fsck via Fsck and
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 15:20, Guy Zelck wrote:
Hi all,
I share a disk with a M$ OS I seldom use. This disk holds a vfat32
partition.
Since I nearly allways use my md8.1 and this partition is mounted
automatically it should be checked.
I don't think the rc.sysinit file takes this into
