-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre Fortin wrote on Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 09:42:29PM -0500 :
Configuration is in /etc/urpmi. Data is in /var/lib/urpmi.
The file that seems to be interfering is
hdlist.Updates for Mandrake Linux 8.2 (ftp1u).cz
If there's no definition for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Coates wrote on Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 09:37:53PM -0800 :
Configuration is in /etc/urpmi. Data is in /var/lib/urpmi.
I agree in principle, but I also feel that if this were truly the case,
backing up and restoring /etc/urpmi/ or mailing
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:23:52 -0800 Todd Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Note that users'
interpretation of errors is usually different from developers'
interpretation. It's not an error if the program keeps running and
works properly, it's only a warning. It's an error if the program
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 10:31, Todd Lyons wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Coates wrote on Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 09:37:53PM -0800 :
Configuration is in /etc/urpmi. Data is in /var/lib/urpmi.
I agree in principle, but I also feel that if this were truly the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre Fortin wrote on Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 03:20:45PM -0500 :
Note that users'
interpretation of errors is usually different from developers'
interpretation. It's not an error if the program keeps running and
works properly, it's only a
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 07:40, Pierre Fortin wrote:
On my new ThinkPad, I first installed LM8.2, then *upgraded* to 9.0...
now, when I try to install additional s/w, urpmi fails; but MCC/SPI
works... what gives??? For example, I get the following response BOTH
before and after a successful
On 25 Nov 2002 09:37:51 -0800 Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 07:40, Pierre Fortin wrote:
On my new ThinkPad, I first installed LM8.2, then *upgraded* to 9.0...
now, when I try to install additional s/w, urpmi fails; but MCC/SPI
works... what gives??? For
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 15:09, Pierre Fortin wrote:
On 25 Nov 2002 09:37:51 -0800 Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
did you delete the 8.2 entries from urpmi's config?
Shouldn't that have been done by 9.0...? I've always done rpm -ivh
installs in the past... thought I'd try the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Coates wrote on Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:12:20PM -0800 :
Anyway, unless there is some implied version info, there is nothing
specifying version in this (unless I'm blind):
One thing about urpmi that doesn't thrill me is that its
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:23:22 -0800 Todd Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Coates wrote on Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:12:20PM -0800 :
Anyway, unless there is some implied version info, there is nothing
specifying version in this (unless
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 16:12, Jack Coates wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 15:09, Pierre Fortin wrote:
On 25 Nov 2002 09:37:51 -0800 Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
did you delete the 8.2 entries from urpmi's config?
Shouldn't that have been done by 9.0...? I've always done rpm
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 17:23, Todd Lyons wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Coates wrote on Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:12:20PM -0800 :
Anyway, unless there is some implied version info, there is nothing
specifying version in this (unless I'm blind):
One thing
12 matches
Mail list logo
