On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 22:53, James Sparenberg wrote:
...
Since VBScript and Valid are a contradiction I'll ignore it *grin* but
the purpose of jscript is to output html code that the broswer can use.
I've got a number of scripts on my page and when I use the w3c validator
it told me not where
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 08:20, Jack Coates wrote:
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 22:53, James Sparenberg wrote:
...
Since VBScript and Valid are a contradiction I'll ignore it *grin* but
the purpose of jscript is to output html code that the broswer can use.
I've got a number of scripts on my page
EH That's the silly part: we're not really even asking for
EH development. We just want them to get rid of the rejection of
EH non IE browsers. It would mean *less* work and less code if
EH they didn't put it in to begin with.
I think it would be more work. They'd have to test it with
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 20:39, James Sparenberg wrote:
...
As for tclhttpd. Sweet isn't it. Small and it just plain works.
Except for that whole writing CGI in TCL thing :-) I've gotten used to
Perl's syntax checker. Using a language where each line's first
validation is its first
Hello Eric,
Sunday, October 12, 2003, 9:40:03 PM, you wrote:
EH That's the silly part: we're not really even asking for
EH development. We just want them to get rid of the rejection of non
EH IE browsers. It would mean *less* work and less code if they
EH didn't put it in to begin with.
I
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 22:13, rikona wrote:
Hello Eric,
Sunday, October 12, 2003, 9:40:03 PM, you wrote:
EH That's the silly part: we're not really even asking for
EH development. We just want them to get rid of the rejection of non
EH IE browsers. It would mean *less* work and less code
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 22:16, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 22:13, rikona wrote:
Hello Eric,
Sunday, October 12, 2003, 9:40:03 PM, you wrote:
EH That's the silly part: we're not really even asking for
EH development. We just want them to get rid of the rejection of
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 22:26, Jack Coates wrote:
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 22:16, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 22:13, rikona wrote:
Hello Eric,
Sunday, October 12, 2003, 9:40:03 PM, you wrote:
EH That's the silly part: we're not really even asking for
EH
