Re: [Fab-user] Re: module -> package

2008-12-08 Thread Jeff Forcier
Hi Christian, just read over the new code branch. The overall splitting up looks pretty good, although core.py's still a little bigger than I'd like. Otherwise, on an organizational level it's far better than it used to be, so great job :D Two complaints and a question: First, I don't really like

Re: [Fab-user] Re: module -> package

2008-12-08 Thread Nicolas Steinmetz
2008/12/8 Christian Vest Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * doc/samples/roles work. Off the top of my head I can't think of any > outstanding issues, but that's not to say that there aren't any. > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] works for a lot more cases than it did when it was > introduced. You can still ma

Re: [Fab-user] Re: module -> package

2008-12-08 Thread Christian Vest Hansen
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Nicolas Steinmetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does it include some fix regarding roles, depends & the py 2.4 compatibility > to know if it's woth testing in my environnement. * doc/samples/roles work. Off the top of my head I can't think of any outstanding issues,

Re: [Fab-user] Re: module -> package

2008-12-08 Thread Nicolas Steinmetz
Hi Christian, 2008/12/8 Christian Vest Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I pushed a fix to another latent reference to a wrong `env` and bumped > up the version number. > > I wonder what people think. Is it good enough to merge? Are we close > to a release with this? Does it include some fix regardi

Re: [Fab-user] Re: module -> package

2008-12-08 Thread Christian Vest Hansen
I pushed a fix to another latent reference to a wrong `env` and bumped up the version number. I wonder what people think. Is it good enough to merge? Are we close to a release with this? On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Christian Vest Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12: