Re: [Fab-user] seperate file for login and passwd

2010-05-14 Thread sstein...@gmail.com
On May 14, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Matthew Good wrote: > Changing the passwords is also more secure. Purging them from the repository > history only prevents them from spreading further, but doesn't remove them > from the other hard drives they've already been checked out on. Yes, the passwords sho

Re: [Fab-user] seperate file for login and passwd

2010-05-14 Thread sstein...@gmail.com
On May 14, 2010, at 8:20 PM, Christian Vest Hansen wrote: > You could also change the passwords, rendering the ones recorded in > history outdated. Whichever method is easier. Yah, I tend to like to just purge things like that so that any login ID's (like Amazon ID's for example) are not expose

Re: [Fab-user] seperate file for login and passwd

2010-05-14 Thread sstein...@gmail.com
On May 14, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Erich Heine wrote: > Bram, > > You've already done the hard part! Assuming you saved the file as mypw.py, > just put an > > from mypw import e2 > > at the top of the fabfile, and you are good to go. Like christian mentioned, > a fabfile is just python, so you c

Re: [Fab-user] Fwd: List commands by module

2010-01-24 Thread sstein...@gmail.com
On Jan 24, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Jeff Forcier wrote: > Thoughts? Yes, it would be good to have something like this to print out the namespace'd stuff in an organized way; not sure when that's planned for. Me, personally, I've already added it to my install as the default and I've found it enormou

[Fab-user] Fwd: List commands by module

2010-01-23 Thread sstein...@gmail.com
I apologize if this turns out to be a repost -- gmail subscription oddities today. S Hey! I was having trouble seeing where things came from in a complex fabfile/fabkit setup and wrote the following list command to display commands by module. Output looks like this (excuse

Re: [Fab-user] On Paramiko (was: Why is the version that's available on pypi only at 0.1.1?)

2009-10-22 Thread sstein...@gmail.com
On Oct 17, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Jeff Forcier wrote: On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:10 PM, sstein...@gmail.com wrote: Can you just pull the specific tag from their SVN? (I have no idea how they're set up) I was planning on either pulling down the 1.7.4 release, or applying Pat's patc

Re: [Fab-user] On Paramiko (was: Why is the version that's available on pypi only at 0.1.1?)

2009-10-22 Thread sstein...@gmail.com
On Oct 18, 2009, at 8:10 PM, sstein...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 17, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Jeff Forcier wrote: If there's anything I can do over the next couple of days, to get 0.9.0 out the door (finally!), please let me know. Taking a look at 0.9-doc-rewrite's Sphinx docs would he

Re: [Fab-user] On Paramiko (was: Why is the version that's available on pypi only at 0.1.1?)

2009-10-22 Thread sstein...@gmail.com
On Oct 17, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Jeff Forcier wrote: If there's anything I can do over the next couple of days, to get 0.9.0 out the door (finally!), please let me know. Taking a look at 0.9-doc-rewrite's Sphinx docs would help Sorry, where would I get that? I'm working on the buildbot for di

Re: [Fab-user] On Paramiko (was: Why is the version that's available on pypi only at 0.1.1?)

2009-10-22 Thread sstein...@gmail.com
On Oct 17, 2009, at 8:37 PM, Jeff Forcier wrote: Hi again all, (Heikki: good to know about that 'simple' PyPI URL, will have to remember it for future reference!) Regarding this Paramiko 1.7.5 issue, I still haven't heard anything back from Tobey at all, and I'd like to release 0.9.0 this week