Re: [Factor-talk] How would I solve this better in Factor?

Björn's can be sped up by not using assoc-map! and replacing ``refine-index`` with this: :: refine-index ( max-i index prev-index -- ) index keys [ [ prev-index at ] [ index set-at ] bi ] each index [ nip max-i >= ] assoc-filter! drop ; That takes it from 2.0 seconds to 1.3 seconds on my

Re: [Factor-talk] How would I solve this better in Factor?

Here is my solution: https://github.com/bjourne/playground-factor/blob/master/examples/golf/challenge-252/challenge-252.factor It's a straight transliteration of the Python solution that was posted in the reddit thread. The hard part was getting the loops right. Factor doesn't have any iteration

Re: [Factor-talk] How would I solve this better in Factor?

Hi, when I'm writing a unoptimized solution to a problem, I usually go top down, thinking about what l lists I have to build and transform. I try to split code into words with names instead of adding comments. I try to use the conventions (

Re: [Factor-talk] How would I solve this better in Factor?

Wow, your words are simple and fit in single lines. Do you write pseudo code that is more expressible in factor or do you write traditional imperative style pseudo code and then translate them to a factor representation? Thanks, Sankar On 2/25/16 12:01 PM, Jon Harper wrote: > "Hi, > I wrote a

Re: [Factor-talk] How would I solve this better in Factor?

PPS: even shorter: : remove-after-underscore ( seq -- seq' ) "_" split1 drop ; ---=--- Александр -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App

Re: [Factor-talk] How would I solve this better in Factor?

Hello, Jon! 25.02.2016, 20:02, "Jon Harper" : > I wrote a basic o(n^4) solution to see how simple it could get. The > code looks nice to me, but it's sllw :) like 1 hour on the 3200 > chars string.. http://paste.factorcode.org/paste?id=3843 Wow, your code looks very

Re: [Factor-talk] How would I solve this better in Factor?

"Hi, I wrote a basic o(n^4) solution to see how simple it could get. The code looks nice to me, but it's sllw :) like 1 hour on the 3200 chars string.. http://paste.factorcode.org/paste?id=3843 I noticed we have 1 function in common : remove-after-underscore. You can can see how head and

Re: [Factor-talk] How would I solve this better in Factor?

Hi! > I struggled quite a lot coming up with this. Mainly in keeping things in > my head and figuring out what I needed to do to bring the stack in order > for the operations I was attempting.. > > Coming from an iterative programming background (with a little bit of > exposure to functional