Re: [Factor-talk] Questions of a newcomer

Hi Chris, On 2016-11-10 11:03, Chris Double wrote: > With that I see what you are seeing. Both numbers print out after the > last thread finishes. It looks like it's buffering in this case. If I > add a 'flush' then I see them printed after 5 seconds then 10 seconds: > >

Re: [Factor-talk] Questions of a newcomer

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:00 PM, wrote: > Any > more ideas why? Is run-process blocking everyone? Is there some FFI call > like you mentioned? Where could I start to debug this on my own? The only difference to what you are doing and what my test did was you're running as a

Re: [Factor-talk] Questions of a newcomer

Hi John, On 2016-11-08 22:38, John Benediktsson wrote: > There are a lot of ways to solve the problem, but without knowing more > about what you're looking for, I'll just leave these here. I spent the last half hour reading your code, running it and examining the vocabularies. Very helpful,

Re: [Factor-talk] Questions of a newcomer

Hi Chris, On 2016-11-08 23:58, Chris Double wrote: > I tried to duplicate the basics of your code with the following: > > self '[ "bash -c \"sleep 10\"" run-process drop 1 _ send ] "1" spawn > self '[ "bash -c \"sleep 5\"" run-process drop 2 _ send ] "2" spawn > receive > > This will spawn two

Re: [Factor-talk] Questions of a newcomer

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:02 AM, wrote: > > There are my last 2 attemps. The first, commented out version finishes > without waiting for the threads to finish (even with the ugly hack of > reading the state>> of the thread) while in the second the receiving > thread doesn't

Re: [Factor-talk] Questions of a newcomer

> > I thought of parallel-map first but I wanted to do a bit more than that, > otherwise I could just write a script that handles one and feed it to > GNU parallel. I wanted to achieve more than what I can with GNU parallel > (which is able to parallelize on multiple cores and writes correctly to

Re: [Factor-talk] Questions of a newcomer

Hi John, On 2016-11-08 16:52, John Benediktsson wrote: >> >> In that case I guess the mailing list makes more sense. Unless there's >> people reading the IRC logs and not part of the mailing list. >> > > The mailing list can be a fine place, or GitHub issues if you run into > some > problems

Re: [Factor-talk] Questions of a newcomer

> > In that case I guess the mailing list makes more sense. Unless there's > people reading the IRC logs and not part of the mailing list. > The mailing list can be a fine place, or GitHub issues if you run into some problems with Factor. If you are worried about higher volume of conversation,

Re: [Factor-talk] Questions of a newcomer

Hi Jon, On 2016-11-07 22:34, Jon Harper wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:07 PM, wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am tinkering with factor and was wondering if it is OK to pick your >> brains here? As I play around with the language questions come up that >> are

Re: [Factor-talk] Questions of a newcomer

Hi Peter, On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:07 PM, wrote: > Hello, > > I am tinkering with factor and was wondering if it is OK to pick your > brains here? As I play around with the language questions come up that > are probably easy for you to answer. I don't see much action on the >