Re: [Factor-talk] subseq?

Thanks for the heads-up, John - I would agree that your changes are a more natural locution. I use these words a lot in various vocabs, but I reckon it won't be too hard to adapt to this new pattern. Cheers, ~cw On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:55 PM, John Benediktsson wrote: >

Re: [Factor-talk] subseq?

That's a fair point since we have larger sets of breaking changes planned. And better refactor tools planned that might allow an 0.98-to-0.99 upgrade path Okay, I agree and will revert in a few. Sorry for the churn. Thanks, John. > On Jan 21, 2017, at 3:44 AM, Jon Harper

Re: [Factor-talk] subseq?

I found only one place in my code where I have used `subseq?`, and even there it was `swap subseq?`. 21.01.2017, 14:45, "Jon Harper" :Hi,How close is the next release ? I saw Slava's taunt on github https://github.com/factor/factor/issues/1783 :)Maybe revert it for 0.98 and