--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
bastards
who care little about their fellow humanity. People like Bill Gates
are
a rare exception
Well 280 billion annually in american philanthropy sort
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
of contortions to obtain his $140 million retirement
package.
At some point in the accumulation of wealth,
Original posts
I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
of contortions to obtain his $140 million retirement
package.
At some point in the accumulation of wealth, money
ceases to be a medium of exchange and becomes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
When rich people talk about money, they're talking
about something entirely different from what poor and
middle-class people mean
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Judy never met a mass-murdering dictator she didn't like.
Bush? Nixon? Oh, you said dictators, not almost or hopeful
dictators. My mistake.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Few people are aware that any suggestion for the elimination of the
estate tax comes with the elimination of the stepped-up basis for
capital gains. Currently, all capital gains get stepped-up of
their cost basis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
From adjacent post:
[to Judy]
If you wish to start a new thread on The Massive Shortcomings of
New.Morning I could start it with at least several 100 points. But I
am biased. I am sure you cite 1000's of points, real or imagined. And
just let Unc get started. Perhaps you and others can start the
itelf.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Thanks card for posting the article on B12. For decades, as a
vegetarian (mostly -- with a 2-3 year trial exception of fish and
poultry ) and vegan at times, I have been aware of the need to
supplement ones diet with B12.
I did not know the low absorbsion rate of the almost universally used
form
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
snip
For Bush to say Saddam wouldn't let them in is simply a lie.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new.morning wrote:
BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
I don't fancy myself anything. I don't take some platform and adopt
it. I think through each issue and decide on the merits. My views
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
-- that you maybe confusing correleation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
-- that you maybe confusing correleation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
-- that you maybe confusing correleation
Re: The Massive Shortcomings of New.Morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
From adjacent post:
[to Judy]
If you wish to start a new thread on The Massive
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
new.morning wrote:
BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
I don't fancy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like many TM'ers back in the late 1970's I gave up on being a
vegetarian. I had too many bouts with hypoglycemia, anemia and vata
derangements. Using supplements will not often deal with the pH
imbalance that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Of course all others are cordially welcomed to chime in. Unc, Tom,
Jim, Peter all have good, perhaps at times entertaining, insights
We were sitting in a Manhattan living room on a spring afternoon, and
Warren Buffett had a Cherry Coke in his hand as usual. But this
unremarkable scene was about to take a surprising turn.
Brace yourself, Buffett warned with a grin. He then described a
momentous change in his thinking. Within
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think a good test would be to take an Indian who comes from a long
line of vegetarians and pair him with a westerner who claims they
function well as a vegetarian and see who actually performs better in a
battery of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All we is more techniques!
We know you are beyond need, Peter. But you can still speak the word
without taking you out of that state. :)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
See
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're going to learn them, it's better to learn them the right
way. In that way they can take a person to full Buddhahood rather
quickly.
Was that your experience?
If you didn't do it, why not? What else could
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 24, 2006, at 11:29 AM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
If you're going to learn them, it's better to learn them the right
way. In that way they can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 24, 2006, at 2:24 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 24, 2006, at 11:29 AM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
RELIGION
Beware the Yoga Demon! The Christian Right's fear of self-
realization
and spirituality
By Mel Seesholtz,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
disincentive to accumulating excessive wealth. It is better to have
more
millionaires than any billionaires. You would allow people to
accumulate
an estate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
disincentive to accumulating excessive wealth. It is better to have
more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few deductions,
starting at incomes over $30-50,000, (even a negative income taxfor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/21/06 10:43 AM, nablus108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And listening to mantras starting with OM is OK with you ?
I use a mantra with OM in it. Have been for several years. Material and
spiritual well-being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/21/06 7:03 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The WIE has details provided by him and his people. Where's the
independent
articles?
One of Amma¹s senior swamis told me that SSRS made a big show of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 6/20/06 7:09:23 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sparaig@
Per subject, are those the only two alternatives that occur to you?
Or is it a hidden yet profound lesson on the shallowness of strawmen
thinking?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In discussing this with Tom Traynor, he wrapped it up
perfectly:
Things happen exactly as they should. Why? Because that's the way they
happened.
Though meaningful perhaps via some other understandings or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
This is why I don't understand why some folks are so
thrown by the idea of determinism. If determinism
were true, it would make absolutely no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 20, 2006, at 12:57 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
In discussing this with Tom Traynor, he wrapped it up
perfectly
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
In discussing this with Tom Traynor, he wrapped
Quotes from FFL Observers
[Commments and implied statements in brackets]
Believe me nobody ever died fighting for
our [their country's] freedom. Instead they fought to keep the rich
rich and the poor poor. They fought the wars as pawns for the rich.
The rich could give a damn about our freedom,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Country WWII deaths/100 population
--- --
That should be deaths per 1000 population, of course.
But
Quotes from FFL Observers
[Commments and implied statements in brackets]
Believe me nobody ever died fighting for
our [their country's] freedom. Instead they fought to keep the rich
rich and the poor poor. They fought the wars as pawns for the rich.
The rich could give a damn about our freedom,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/12/06 10:15:53 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And it's ironic, too, how many of those who would send others to fight
in wars have never actually volunteered for one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Thanks for your thoughts and inputs.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 10, 2006, at 12:27 AM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
Magical thinking,, myth, art, poetry, drama, literature, dreams, are
great things -- in the vast realms that science does not provide a
more effective
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we may be saying something roughly similar,
except that I don't know whether you put much stock
in intuition.
I definitely do, although I may or may not have more limits on how far
that can go. In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Comments in [brackets].
That's not intuition, that's common sense, Curtis. Intuition is that
annoying thing :) you often hear women say, I just have a feeling...
about something or someone that seems completely
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may have two good terms for the same thing! I think of intuition
as an internal ability to detect patterns and create wholes out of
perceived parts.
Then why not recognize it as pattern recognition -- on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Sal,
I'll have to think about what we mean by intuition. For me, years of
noticing people's behaviors and patterns have sharpened my ability to
have better intuition about people's future behavior.
Pattern
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 10, 2006, at 11:34 AM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
One thing that Sanskrit literature and philosophy teaches us is that
each drishti or way
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
You may have two good terms for the same thing! I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 10, 2006, at 3:57 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
The view in Jivan-mukta or other states does not change the
chemistry
and physics
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 10, 2006, at 3:26 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
You have quite missed the point about magical thinking. And about
subjective science.
I'm merely replying to your brief remarks and less all this other
Ten Rules for Being Human
by Cherie Carter-Scott
1. You will receive a body. You may like it or hate it, but it's
yours to keep for the entire period.
2. You will learn lessons. You are enrolled in a full-time informal
school called, life.
3. There are no mistakes, only lessons.
http://www.worldometers.info/
(wait a bit and the counters will starts moving)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free. See how.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
http://www.rhymezone.com/
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Protect your PC from spy ware with award winning anti spy technology. It's free.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/97bhrC/LGxNAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not convinced that's the case in many areas.
Has he ever said evolutionary theory is wrong, for
example?
When asked who was correct Evolutionists or Fundamentalists (god
created man with no intermediate steps), he
We all make them. To the extent that we are aware of their existence
and structure, we can avoid them in our own internal reasoning, and in
communications.
Whoever has more than 20 in any post, gets a gallon of woowoo juice.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases
Cognitive bias
. That such keep you grounded in what IS,
right now -- well only attests to the glory of creation -- that
opposite practices can result in the same fruit.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply
error at Cornell.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0029117062/sr=8-1/qid=1149893839/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-4458199-6191348?%5Fencoding=UTF8
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
We all make them. To the extent that we are aware of their existence
And may we stay clear of the weewee.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
May the woowoo be with you? Hmmm...
Sal
On Jun 9, 2006, at 4:57 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Woo woo really encapulates the feeling that many
of us have for the Force (in a
Curtis,
I agree with the general point that using words in discussions with
others that have a perjorative connonation -- to them -- is not
usually helpful to the tone and fruitfulness of the discussion. Often
this occurs when there is not a common understanding of meaning.
Reading your recent
Thanks for your thoughts and inputs.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
I don't think he's thought these points through
very well, or at least he isn't explaining them
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
I was interested in these points but I can't figure out what I
think yet:
And they can and should be applied to subjective
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 6/6/06 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/5/06 9:48:02 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And I thought his equating spiritual ganja with male
I earlier read some the excerpts for which you provided links. I liked
it. You seem to have well distilled some life experiences.
Publishing question: Will you be making it available on Amazon? If so,
how does that work? Do you supply them with x copies? Or do they get
books from Lulu -- as
oh sal, you aren't egotistical. :)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Probably because he fits in so well with the rest of us...
Sal
On Jun 6, 2006, at 12:16 PM, feste37 wrote:
You seem like a rude, egotistical old bore. Why don't you just go
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Actually, when you make comments like you did about that U of C
professor from that column that I posted, I am led to believe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ashelkent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Lulu has three distribution plans:
1. the one I'm using now. Free. Anyone can order from Lulu. I can
order books at
production cost
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/5/06 3:31:02 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...pretending all the while that it wasn't about sex.
No, it was payback for Richard Nixon and Clarence Thomas.
There is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:15 AM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
So what is yours (and Bhairitu's) take on MMY and other teachers
reported sexual encounters, with regards to tantra? Do you feel there
was some reasonable
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Ry Cooder started out in the Delta style. He moved on to fantastic
fusion projects.
Actually, Ry started out with one of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
Patti Boyd: My life as a muse
The muse sayeth:
But you have to cut yourself a bit of slack in the end,
I think. I certainly wouldn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm old enough (56) to remember air raid drills in grammar school in
which
we'd assemble in the hallway and cover our heads with our hands
Well, that dosn't say much for the Conn educational system. :) In
california
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
I don't know who here is old enough to remember the
1950s and what it was like growing up in them.
..
It was
not a happy time
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 11:14 AM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:15 AM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
So what is yours
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 11:14 AM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
Can a student get it (things tantric) via transmission?
Well, it depends what you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 11:14 AM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
Can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:00 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
What specifically have you heard? I never heard him mention tantra --
that I can recall.
A friend I know asked him directly about tantra, so I'm replying
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You may lose an arm and a leg, but the make the remaining arm and
leg feel really, really good!
Which seemed to be you strategy in saying you would give an arm and
two legs to have sex with that blonde school
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 2:45 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
Thirdly, drugs. That was the era when drugs became fashionable.
What's so good about that?
We found out we were being lied to? :
NO ASSOCIATION AT ALL...EVEN A
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 2:46 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:00 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
What specifically have you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 2:45 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
Thirdly, drugs. That was the era when drugs became fashionable.
What's so good
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Vaj and new_morning_blank_slate (and MDixon for that matter):
Fall all over yourselves in your apparent rush to defend drug use,
even something as seemingly innoculous as marijuana. You'll make
yourselves look
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 2:46 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
All of which swerves widely from the main point: Could MMy have some
knowledge of sexually related tantric practices by one of many means?
Of course you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
You may lose an arm and a leg, but the make
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Vaj and new_morning_blank_slate (and MDixon
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
I am for the full legalisation of drugs, as I've posted
here many times.
But there's nothing -- absolutely no reason -- for
OK, just to irritate Shemp, and possible Vaj, Bhariru, Unc and who
knows who else (hey a 4-shot is pretty good) here is another article.
Warning!!! Warning
The above was intented humor and does NOT endorse irritating people.
Warning!!! Warning
On Sexual Tantra and Pot. Now we just
http://www.drugpolicy.org/library/ramdass.cfm
A Harvard-educated teacher, philosopher and spiritual seeker, Ram Dass
is a living bridge between the wisdom of the East and Western ideals
of justice and social action. He has been a life-long champion of
social policies based on reason and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
I am for the full legalisation of drugs, as I've posted
here many
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
I'm all for myth-busting. But I'm also for common sense.
Great! Do you have the date set for the big plunge? (when you plan to
start
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vajradhatu108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
Which is fine. My primary hypothesis, which you have provided no
evidence of substance to counter is that i) it is possible M. had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 6/5/06 5:16 PM, vajradhatu108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once again, ANYTHING is possible, some things are more probable.
It's highly
improbable
M. is a tantric adept, for the numerous valid reasons I've
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He also has brought people in to teach him things.
Oh the shame, the shame Were (among) their names, Larry Domash
and John Haiglin?
No...
So it was ok to bring in Domash and Haiglin to teach him things, but
not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Chill out over global warming
By David Harsanyi
Denver Post Staff Columnist
Admittedly, I possess virtually no expertise in science. That puts
me in exactly the same position as most dogmatic environmentalists
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 7:36 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vajradhatu108 vajranatha@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Without reading it, I am guessing that the Buddhists who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Without reading it, I am guessing that the Buddhists who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
snip
Who are referencing besides {Tom??} from Estes Park
1 - 100 of 285 matches
Mail list logo