Duveyoung,
Some thoughts from an ape's brain.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@... wrote:
X,
This'll be too long to read. I'm just putting it here cuz I want to write
about it for the 2,001st time, but I think you should read it and see that
I'm at least trying
We could stand more of this dialogue on FFL. What a breath of fresh
air.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@... wrote:
X,
This'll be too long to read. I'm just putting it here cuz I want to
write about it for the 2,001st time, but I think you should read it and
see
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@... wrote:
Hey Edg.
What you say makes sense to me, at least on an intuitive level. I don't
know jack about Advaita, but the statement, not that, not that
I guess the Sanskrit expression is 'neti neti'. It seems to be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@... wrote:
Read and see how -
http://www.shiningworld.com/top/images/stories/pub-pdfs/Articles/%284%29\
%20Neo-Advaita.pdf
YS, from memory:
prakaasha-kriyaa-sthiti-shiilaM bhuutendriyaatmakaM ***bhogaapavargaarthaM***
dRshyam!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@... wrote:
Read and see how -
http://www.shiningworld.com/top/images/stories/pub-pdfs/Articles/%284%29\
%20Neo-Advaita.pdf
Well, methinks advaita is only suitable for people already enlightened
because, as the intellect (mahat,
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 2:19 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Neo-Advaita is just confused advaita
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@... wrote:
Read and see how -
http://www.shiningworld.com/top/images/stories/pub-pdfs/Articles/%284%29
.
From: cardemaister no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 2:19 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Neo-Advaita is just confused advaita
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote:
Read
so far away
s with only MA and MS to her name
From: merudanda no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 8:44 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Neo-Advaita is just confused advaita
oh this magical lovely like
I read about two pages of the below pdf file.
This guy is clever, but he doesn't get Advaita. Nope.
In fact, I'll just say it: it's not merely the author of the pdf I'm finding
fault with; I've yet to read any post at FFL that had me believing even one
other person at FFL -- other than ME --
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@... wrote:
Fuck no it ain't.
I'm a very good writer
Edg
LOL!!
Although I posted this article to the group recently , methinks you
never read it.
Your claim methinks advaita is only suitable for people already
enlightened
is a double entendre on the meaning of this article on traditional
vedanta.
Hey Edg.
What you say makes sense to me, at least on an intuitive level. I don't
know jack about Advaita, but the statement, not that, not that has
always made sense to me, and it sounds that you are saying something
along these lines. I am not sure why emptybill even feels the need to
debate
Now suppose I got those books you read and reread, but only read the first two
pages of each one (but those two pages perhaps more than once)? Silence being
'part of the definition of everything' sounds about right '-- that is dirt,
love, God, money, sin, Hitler -- any thing is merely nuanced
X,
This'll be too long to read. I'm just putting it here cuz I want to write
about it for the 2,001st time, but I think you should read it and see that I'm
at least trying to be honest...laughable as that is for a goal.
You could be right. How would I ever know though? Only through you and
14 matches
Mail list logo
