jstein wrote:
Wrong once more. *Nobody* would be a flagrant
overposter at 50 per week in the sense the
35-post limit was designed to curb.
According to the moderator, you are a flagrant
over-poster: you are limited to 25 posts per week.
Put a lid on it!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
I hereby decree: No borrowing, lending, selling, or otherwise
transferring unused posts.
No problem- on the other hand, using this guideline to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
snip
As others have said, the original guideline was put in place to
curb flagrant over posters. I am not in that category, and have
not been. If
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:47 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
snip
As others have said, the original guideline was put in place to curb
flagrant over posters.
Of which you have been one on at least several occasions, posting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipIn terms of
enlightened behavior, you haven't even learned
how to crawl yet, dude,
And I hope I *never* *ever* learn enlightened behavior. That to me
seems a far darker and more hopeless prison than even blithe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:47 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
snip
As others have said, the original guideline was put in place to
curb
flagrant over
On Nov 10, 2007, at 10:24 AM, authfriend wrote:
Nope, wrong, Sal. Read what he wrote again: The
ORIGINAL GUIDELINE was put in place to curb flagrant
overposters (my emphasis). The original posting
limit was *not* put in place to curb Jim; he was
*not* considered one of the flagrant overposters
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snipJim's bright and cheery sense of humor, along with his ability
to laugh at his own foibles, comes shining through with every post.
Sal
as a gentle suggestion, you may want to consider your own dour and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 10, 2007, at 10:24 AM, authfriend wrote:
Nope, wrong, Sal. Read what he wrote again: The
ORIGINAL GUIDELINE was put in place to curb flagrant
overposters (my emphasis). The original posting
limit was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
steve.sundur@ wrote:
I am you, you are me. We're one happy fa-mi-ly. With a great big
hug and kiss from me to you, won't you say you love me too.
(Barney
Song)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
R: IMO and IME, hell *is* the hotline to wisdom
:-)
nablusoss1008 wrote: If this world is hell I will agree... ;-)
R: What do *you* mean by this world?
(I am speaking of all the worlds present in our bodymind, here and
now.)
There is no escaping the
--Well done, Rory...so what's the next step?
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
steve.sundur@ wrote:
I am you, you are me. We're one happy fa-mi-ly. With a great
big
hug and kiss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of jim_flanegin
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 7:19 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Rory Martin Bormann
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 8, 2007, at 7:18 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
PS Sal, I borrowed one of your posts for this and my previous
comment.
You always have about 30 of 'em lying around anyway unused each
week,
and so I appreciate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--Well done, Rory...so what's the next step?
Thank you, matrix, but it's not as if I really have anything to do with
it! :-)
At this moment, it appears to simply be more of the same -- healing and
integrating (or
--- Thanks, can you see dead people? If so, what's the status of most
of themsay, ordinary people. How long does it take them to get
their bearings and realize there's Spiritual work to do, instead of
spending their lives watching the NFL and drinking beer? Or, do they
not realize
On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:47 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
I wouldn't even bother with this if you hadn't made it clear that
you
couldn't be bothered with counting, and basically asked someone
else
to do it. So I obliged.
Please quote when I said this back to me. You are making this up.
Why am I
On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:47 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
I wouldn't even bother with this if you hadn't made it clear that
you
couldn't be bothered with counting, and basically asked someone
else
to do it. So I obliged.
Please quote when I said this back to me. You are making this up.
Why am I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Thanks, can you see dead people?
It's pretty easy for most to do so, I think; all we have to do is let
go (at least temporarily) of the belief in the limiting power of
spacetime, and trust the subtle
-
Thanks - getting drunk, perhaps being an alcoholic; where do you draw
the line, finally admitting that something is not OK?:
and realize there's Spiritual work to do, instead of
spending their lives watching the NFL and drinking beer?
That too can be and actually is spiritual work :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tertonzeno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-
Thanks - getting drunk, perhaps being an alcoholic; where do you
draw
the line, finally admitting that something is not OK?:
For me, something is not OK *in myself* when I realize it is an
addiction trying to
(snip)
I have no objections to being Goering, or Hitler, or anyone else,
you understand -- I am just trying to be clear about the actual
experience and its possible ramifications.
(Snip)
For whatever it's worth, from my information on a couple of the dudes
mentioned...
I feel that I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
He claims he was (see his website), or at least he claims that
in a
past life he was Hitler's second-in-command, who was Bormann.
What was
it like to
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:35 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Rory Martin Bormann?
You would not make such a claim simply because it is not physically
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Rory Martin Bormann?
You would not make such a claim simply because it is not physically
possible. Goering, along with all the top nazi-fellows are enjoying
a very long extended stay in utter and total tamas. It's not for me
to say for how long
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:35 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Rory Martin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:35 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Rory Martin Bormann
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of curtisdeltablues
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:30 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Rory Martin Bormann?
a hot line to hell
Thanks for my next song title Rick!
Do I get
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It has been brought up before that all too often people attempting
to view their past lives will conclude that they were someone
famous. I understand you are not doing this (since that is what you
just
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Rory Martin Bormann?
You would not make such a claim simply because it is not
physically possible. Goering, along with all the top
nazi-fellows are enjoying a very long extended stay in
utter and total tamas. It's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 8, 2007, at 2:22 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
you crack me up!
35, Jim. Hasta la vista until Saturday.
Sal
I was waiting for you to say that...sayonara, mom
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
IMO and IME, hell *is* the hotline to wisdom
:-)
jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote:
yes, very much so-- to hell and gone is more than just an idle
phrase
DAMN, that's
On Nov 8, 2007, at 2:22 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
you crack me up!
35, Jim. Hasta la vista until Saturday.
Sal
Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
IMO and IME, hell *is* the hotline to wisdom
:-)
jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, very much so-- to hell and gone is more than just an idle
phrase
DAMN, that's brilliant!
:-)
@
wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:35 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Rory Martin Bormann?
You would not make
--
Mainstay of the Wehrmacht:
http://www.military-collections.com/weapons.html
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rory:
I am not prepared to say that I *was* Herman Goering, or anyone
else
for that matter, although I am prepared to say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
IMO and IME, hell *is* the hotline to wisdom
:-)
jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote:
yes, very much so-- to hell and gone is more than just an idle
phrase
DAMN, that's
]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:35 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Rory Martin Bormann?
You would not make such a claim simply because it is not
physically possible. Goering, along with all the top
Rory:
I am not prepared to say that I *was* Herman Goering, or anyone else
for that matter, although I am prepared to say Herman Goering *is* a
part of me, as is everything and everyone else
*Spin*
Rory:
This feels indescribable because it's a priori, but utterly loving-
radiant-ecstatic if I
@
wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:35 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Rory Martin Bormann?
You would not make
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Spin*
snip
*Meister*
*lurk*
Actually, I think that was Goebbels
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
It has been brought up before that all too often people
attempting
to view their past lives will conclude that they were someone
famous. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rory:
I am not prepared to say that I *was* Herman Goering, or anyone
else
for that matter, although I am prepared to say Herman Goering *is*
a
part of me, as is everything and everyone else
*Spin*
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
It has been brought up before that all too often people attempting
to view their past lives will conclude that they were someone famous.
Emptybill:
This generalization is an old but undeserved criticism because it is
nothing but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
It has been brought up before that all too often people
attempting
to view their past lives will conclude that they were someone
famous.
jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it only be spin if it provided Rory some sort of one-sided
advantage to do so? That is my understanding of spin, or bias. If
you analyze his writing, you'll find that there is no spin, that he
in fact experiences the world accurately as a
On Nov 8, 2007, at 7:18 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
PS Sal, I borrowed one of your posts for this and my previous comment.
You always have about 30 of 'em lying around anyway unused each week,
and so I appreciate in advance your spirit of generosity. In fact,
I'll make a deal with you; you continue
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of jim_flanegin
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 7:19 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Rory Martin Bormann?
PS Sal, I borrowed one of your posts for this and my previous comment.
You
Rory:
I am not prepared to say that I *was* Herman Goering, or anyone
else for that matter, although I am prepared to say Herman Goering
is a part of me, as is everything and everyone else. This feels
indescribable because it's a priori, but utterly loving-
radiant-ecstatic if I choose to
If you want to be godlike, you have to master the demonic virtues.
Destructiveness is a virtue of Shiva, right? Well, if one is at ritam
level and wants to maintain balance, the demonic energies are just the
ticket to keep one from identifying with any of the gods and becoming
lost in the
Edg:
If you want to be godlike, you have to master the demonic virtues.
Lurk:
Tell me something I don't know.
How bout Rory saying, Yea, I was Herman G. and I needed that
lifetime to round out some life experience I was lacking so I could
attain Brahman C. in this lifetime. No biggy. Noble
--The 3-rd Reich equivalent to being a Raja: being anointed a
Knight of the Iron Cross, of which there were 5 grades. Herman G. is
probably on the list. In this incarnation he can become a Raja by
wiring in the one Mil; thus (perhaps) being the only person ever to
be a Knight of the Iron
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edg:
If you want to be godlike, you have to master the demonic virtues.
Lurk:
Tell me something I don't know.
How bout Rory saying, Yea, I was Herman G. and I needed that
lifetime to round out some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Past-life memories came floating up of following the highly
charismatic Hitler; of being his second-in-command;
I don't think I misread this at all; it looks pretty plain.
a) I do see a difference between Bormann and
Past-life memories came floating up of following the highly
charismatic Hitler; of being his second-in-command;
I don't think I misread this at all; it looks pretty plain.
But I like your posts.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He claims he was (see his website), or at least he claims that in a
past life he was Hitler's second-in-command, who was Bormann. What was
it like to be Bormann, Rory?
Actually, I am wondering if you read my website very
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Past-life memories came floating up of following the highly
charismatic Hitler; of being his second-in-command;
I don't think I misread this at all;
57 matches
Mail list logo
