To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of Deepak
Did you go thru with the recertification process Rick?
No. I was out of the TMO by that time.
From what little I know it sounds
insulting to ask people to do that who have initiated thousands
Yes it was Shemp. The tell all websites indicate that it was, in the past at
least, given as
the sixth advanced technique. My feelings are mixed about those websites that
tell all and
am more than a little reticent to go into great detail. I had had 3 advanced
techniques at
that point and
I missed out completely on this whole project, Tom.
Was this a technique provided/sold under the auspices of the TMO?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My own experience was somewhat different probably due to not
getting the 3 in 1 deal
mentioned in an
I got my Bliss technique for free. I drove my
girlfriend to his offices in Massachusetts so she
could get her technique. I sat to wait (it was
hours)and did my program. Apparently I was right next
to the room were he was giving the Bliss technique and
I heard the same technique being given out
TurquoiseB wrote:
First, George, thank you so much for expressing your
opinion of Chopra so clearly and so compassionately.
I didn't feel in your post a gram of the anger and
hostility I've been talking about feeling in some
other recent posts about him.
well Barry, thank you for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
[...]
Another way of looking at it, George, is that
Chopra *disagrees* with Maharishi's teaching.
That does not imply that he never understood it.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Stu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could be wrong of course, but I always felt
Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding
of
Maharishi's teaching.
Another way of looking at it, George, is that
Interestingly enough, Stu, having been
around the spiritual teacher block a few
times in the 30 years since I last saw
Maharishi, I would describe *him* the
same way you describe Chopra. He had a
few introductory concepts down and he
spent 50 years winging it and finding
different ways of
We should not forget that Maharishi spoke of 200% value of life. I,
for one, will be interested in the progress of the big machines
plumbing the depths of Maya, in parallel with my own subjective
explorations of inner reality.
We're pretty fortunate really at this time as humans. We are in
15, 2008 10:43:49 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of Deepak
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Angela Mailander
mailander111@ ... wrote:
Couple points:
That the material world is an illusion was understood in the popular
mind
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
If I remember correctly, in his books Deepak was
a proponent of positive thinking as well ...
(M said if a poor man repeats over and over
I am rich, I am rich, I am rich
that does not make him a rich
My own experience was somewhat different probably due to not getting the 3 in
1 deal
mentioned in an earlier post. I received/purchased the bliss aka
psycho-physiological
technique during a summer assembly in DC. After opening and placing on a table
a small
pocket sized two sided picture
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 2:40 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of Deepak
My own experience was somewhat different probably due
Did you go thru with the recertification process Rick? From what little I know
it sounds
insulting to ask people to do that who have initiated thousands. Was it done as
akin to a
loyalty test?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deepak never became
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 4:07 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of Deepak
Did you go thru with the recertification process Rick?
No. I
Looked like a shake-down to me.
- Original Message
From: Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 4:30:20 PM
Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of Deepak
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 4:07 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem TMO mgmt had was that many teachers were going
independent in order to avoid charging the new high fees for TM
instruction. This created a situation where people initiated into TM
by independents
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
--- Stu buttsplicer@ wrote:
I could be wrong of course, but I always felt
Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Classic example of Chopra's diasagreement with Maharishi is
his description of the role of the mantra in TM found in the
HIstory Channel's documentary on Maharishi:
The mantra interferes with the thinking process.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
[...]
Another way of looking at it, George, is that
Chopra *disagrees* with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
The problem TMO mgmt had was that many teachers were going
independent in order to avoid charging the new high fees for TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
snip
Classic example of Chopra's diasagreement with Maharishi is
his description of the role of the mantra in TM found in the
HIstory Channel's
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 2:49 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of Deepak
--- In HYPERLINK
mailto:FairfieldLife
First, George, thank you so much for expressing your
opinion of Chopra so clearly and so compassionately.
I didn't feel in your post a gram of the anger and
hostility I've been talking about feeling in some
other recent posts about him. Just one comment:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Couple points:
That the material world is an illusion was understood in the popular
mind to mean the world is a mirage, i.e. not really there. Shankara
made the term clear long before MMY
MMY attributed his
Thanks for the clarification. I had read Shankara independently of MMY's
teaching.
- Original Message
From: authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 2:48:53 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: making the rounds: another view of Deepak
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Behalf Of authfriend
Angela Mailander
mailander111@ wrote:
Couple points:
That the material world is an illusion was understood in the
popular mind to mean the world is a mirage, i.e. not really
there.
I could be wrong of course, but I always felt
Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding of
Maharishi's teaching.
Another way of looking at it, George, is that
Chopra *disagrees* with Maharishi's teaching.
That does not imply that he never understood it.
I have been to a number
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Stu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could be wrong of course, but I always felt
Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding of
Maharishi's teaching.
Another way of looking at it, George, is that
Chopra *disagrees* with Maharishi's teaching.
--- Stu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could be wrong of course, but I always felt
Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding
of
Maharishi's teaching.
Another way of looking at it, George, is that
Chopra *disagrees* with Maharishi's teaching.
That does not imply that he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Stu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could be wrong of course, but I always felt
Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding
of
Maharishi's teaching.
Another way of looking at it, George, is that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Couple points:
That the material world is an illusion was understood in the popular
mind to mean the world is a mirage, i.e. not really there. Shankara
made the term clear long before MMY by explaining that
Interestingly enough, Stu, having been
around the spiritual teacher block a few
times in the 30 years since I last saw
Maharishi, I would describe *him* the
same way you describe Chopra. He had a
few introductory concepts down and he
spent 50 years winging it and finding
different ways
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Another way of looking at it, George, is that
Chopra *disagrees* with Maharishi's teaching.
That does not imply that he never understood it.
I recall a lecture that Chopra gave where he turned apologetically to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
mailander111@ wrote:
Couple points:
That the material world is an illusion was understood in the popular
mind to mean the world is a mirage, i.e. not really
36 matches
Mail list logo
