[FairfieldLife] Re: Not all shaktipat or dharshan is equall

2007-09-27 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HP: I will do my best to respond. If you want insight into my Guru by reading, then all of what Ramana has to say is the same my Guru would say. My Guru's last guru that apointed my Guru as Guru, was commissioned to be a

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Not all shaktipat or dharshan is equall

2007-09-27 Thread Peter
Ron (or shoud we call you by your new name?), what's the name of the guru commissioned by Poonjaji? -Peter --- Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HP: I will do my best to respond. If you want insight into my Guru by reading, then all of what Ramana has to say is the same my Guru would say. My

[FairfieldLife] Re: Not all shaktipat or dharshan is equall

2007-09-27 Thread Ron
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ron (or shoud we call you by your new name?), what's the name of the guru commissioned by Poonjaji? -Peter Well, I took sanyas- it is more karma sanya, the name Hridaya Puri means something like living in the city with

[FairfieldLife] Re: Not all shaktipat or dharshan is equall

2007-09-27 Thread Ron
If my posts are pissing you off, you may consider hitting the delete button whenever you see a post from me All this mix of gurus is probably the reason for your profound confusion, IMO.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Not all shaktipat or dharshan is equall

2007-09-27 Thread nablusoss1008
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If my posts are pissing you off, you may consider hitting the delete button whenever you see a post from me All this mix of gurus is probably the reason for your profound confusion, IMO. I'm reading it page by

[FairfieldLife] Re: Not all shaktipat or dharshan is equall

2007-09-26 Thread purushaz
Ron---You don't understand, how many times do we have to go over this? In Muktananda's tradition, there's a transfer of Shakti from the BODY(s) of Muktananda to the BODY(s) of the disciple. Therefore, the me in that context refers to the body, (and of course all of attributes that make up a

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Not all shaktipat or dharshan is equall

2007-09-26 Thread Peter
he is a she. --- purushaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ron---You don't understand, how many times do we have to go over this? In Muktananda's tradition, there's a transfer of Shakti from the BODY(s) of Muktananda to the BODY(s) of the disciple. Therefore, the me in that context

[FairfieldLife] Re: Not all shaktipat or dharshan is equall

2007-09-26 Thread Ron
The use of words may be frustrating in this case. Often My Guru will say this one replacing the word I, the other Gurus in my path do the same. My Guru said that speaking this way is researved or those Realized because the me is gone and there is nothing to replace it with. On other

[FairfieldLife] Re: Not all shaktipat or dharshan is equall

2007-09-26 Thread yifuxero
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The use of words may be frustrating in this case. Often My Guru will say this one Right, but Ramana Maharshi and others say I'. Saying this one all the time is ridiculous!.. replacing the word I, the other Gurus in my path

[FairfieldLife] Re: Not all shaktipat or dharshan is equall

2007-09-26 Thread Ron
HP: I will do my best to respond. If you want insight into my Guru by reading, then all of what Ramana has to say is the same my Guru would say. My Guru's last guru that apointed my Guru as Guru, was commissioned to be a guru by Poonjaji. In addition, my Guru's Guru had 3 tantric masters and