From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bronte Baxter
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 1:21 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Regarding Judy's Comment/ Is Ego an I or
a Me?
If I seem paranoid in believing the guru set does
Judy wrote:
I think the notion of free will is an artifact
of duality.
Bronte writes:
Wow, Judy. This statement of yours demonstrates that these aren't just
semantic distinctions between us. I assume you are saying that from your
perspective free will does not exist in higher
Judy wrote:
I think the notion of free will is an artifact
of duality.
Bronte writes:
Wow, Judy. This statement of yours demonstrates that these aren't
just semantic distinctions between us.
Hi Bronte,
This statement aside, I think that what Judy may be saying, is that
on the whole, do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy wrote:
I think the notion of free will is an artifact
of duality.
Bronte writes:
Wow, Judy. This statement of yours demonstrates that these aren't
just semantic distinctions between us. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I replied to this once. Somehow it never posted, so here goes
again:
From Judy, quoting Bronte:
To claim that the ego is only a Me is to perceive only its
limited expression. Such limited
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
brontebaxter8@ wrote:
I replied to this once. Somehow it never posted, so here goes
again:
From Judy, quoting Bronte:
To claim that the ego
--Nope Billy - Bronte is more correct - although Auth is technically
correct to a certain extent.. The bottom line, beyond the lively
exchange of ideas, amounts to a thorough, deepseated POV about how
one views the world and the ultimate goal of human evolution: (as
discussed in a previous
--- yagyax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously, the
false I does vanish but this is only one component
of what makes up
a person, which distinguishes one person from
another: MMY is not
SSRS, etc.
What distinguishes MMY from SSRS are space/time
qualities. Of course these are
---No, you're wrong. In a broad definition of individual, one can
define an entity as become composed of relative components that do
not converge on a entity called the I. Thus, Ramana Maharshi is
definitely an individual, otherwise he would not dare use such words
as I and me in the context
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my understanding is that if
you identify with the Self rather than the self,
Judy, in your framework:
Who is the you that is identifying with the small self?
If the answer is the ego, then what is the differentiation
Hey, New Morning. I've been loving your posts on opinions that are 97.9 %
true, rules of engagement for dialoging, etc. Your observations are very
profound to me.
Regarding this question, I'm not sure what you are asking -- this is thorny
stuff to put into words, so abstract -- but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rocks have no self-referential consciousness so they
are not individuals.
And enlightenment, you have suggested, does not need a nervous system.
Which is quite a distinct proposition from the almost truism that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
my understanding is that if
you identify with the Self rather than the self,
Judy, in your framework:
Who is the you that is identifying with the
13 matches
Mail list logo
