Hey Jeff,
Sorry, very late to this thread - just catching up.
I agree that in the future it is wise to avoid these types of issues.
In other context where I am hoping to work with wallpapers I intended
to use the following:
Images of people, buildings, and flags should probably be avoided.
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
To my reckoning this is the first Fedora artwork that has had culture
specific elements in it, so this sort of issue might never have been
raised in prior discussions. I don't know, I mostly lurk. But I'm
bringing it to your attention to make sure you see that reaction.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro wrote:
We played a bit with Cambridge cultural elements but it didn't get further
than some preliminary concepts (and of course someone complained about a
visible church).
I think cultural references are good and personally
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:52:58PM -0700, Máirín Duffy wrote:
- Original Message
From: Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com
I hadn't seen anyone else bring this perspective up concerning the
wallpaper in the beta and I thought it deserved attention for your
consideration as
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 17:52 -0700, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Hello Jeff,
Thank you for bringing this serious matter to our attention -
Wow, way to deal with critics ! I'm impressed by your command of
ridicule.
I'm much less impressed with the beta background though. IMO it is
really overloaded
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm much less impressed with the beta background though. IMO it is
really overloaded with all too well-known motifs, to the extent that it
appears almost like a satire of a constructed background image. I mean,
it has
- Original Message
From: Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
I'm much less impressed with the beta background though. IMO it is
really overloaded with all too well-known motifs, to the extent that it
appears almost like a satire of a constructed background image. I mean,
it has
I hadn't seen anyone else bring this perspective up concerning the
wallpaper in the beta and I thought it deserved attention for your
consideration as a group.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-olpc-list/2009-March/msg00147.html
Seems to me whoever chose the background that was introduced
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 10:55 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
I hadn't seen anyone else bring this perspective up concerning the
wallpaper in the beta and I thought it deserved attention for your
consideration as a group.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-olpc-list/2009-March/msg00147.html
2009/3/14 Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com:
Hm... I don't see a valid reasoning there.
I'm delibrately not trying to make a statement as to validity of the
reasoning about the objection. In fact, I might even question the idea
that reasoning is ever a part of an emotional response. I'm
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 01:13:43PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
2009/3/14 Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com:
Hm... I don't see a valid reasoning there.
I'm delibrately not trying to make a statement as to validity of the
reasoning about the objection. In fact, I might even question the
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:52:58PM -0700, Máirín Duffy wrote:
- Original Message
From: Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com
I hadn't seen anyone else bring this perspective up concerning the
wallpaper in the beta and I thought it deserved attention for your
consideration as a
- Original Message
From: Máirín Duffy mai...@linuxgrrl.com
To: Fedora Art List fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 8:52:58 PM
Subject: Re: Just an FYI concerning the beta artwork
Hello Jeff,
Thank you for bringing this serious matter to our attention
Hello Jeff,
Thank you for bringing this serious matter to our attention -
- Original Message
From: Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com
To: Fedora Art List fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 2:55:51 PM
Subject: Just an FYI concerning the beta artwork
I
14 matches
Mail list logo
