and fail miserably )-:
Now I promise I will try to dig in to the root cause of the build failure
but since ppc no longer is a primary architecture, the failed build on PPC
shouldn't hold up the release on the primary architectures.
Not really, that is a bit of a problem.
--
Jesse Keating
, the script acts differently depending
on the size of the key.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 11:22 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
It wasn't properly recusing in the --selfhosting or --fulltree cases
before, leading to potenial broken deps.
Applied and built on rawhide.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
process are under qemu, which will make it extremely
slow.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https
haven't tried doing it with pungi. I'd
have to look a bit deeper into it.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
matches. I'll
need to look into that and work with seth to find a better API call to
use here.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora
is noarch.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
suggestions welcome.
Only thing I could come up with is some hack in pungi to consider noarch
and any other binary arch the same enough so that you only get the
highest n-v-r in those cases.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
On Jul 18, 2009, at 15:46, Sergio Monteiro Basto ser...@sergiomb.no-ip.org
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 14:44 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 21:35 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
Hi,
I am trying http://sergiomb.no-ip.org/pungi/confs/buildiso-f11.sh
with pungi
permissions exist inside the chroot, particularly for
doing things as non-root such as the rpm build. Perhaps we need to do
the group addition step before we install the BuildRequirements. I
assume that avahi picks a somewhat random UID when it installs itself?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom
mounting of dev/ is only there for the
loop entries, I don't know of any other mock consumers that require a
real /dev/ tree. We might consider just always file bind mounting a few
loop entries in and only having one code path.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http
This patch copies the host /etc/localtime into the chroot. This allows the
chroot
to have the same timezone info as the host, which plays into timestamps and
such.
--
Jes
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
---
py/mock/backend.py |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/py/mock/backend.py b/py/mock/backend.py
index 2bc63df..6c9bb6e 100644
--- a/py/mock/backend.py
+++ b/py/mock/backend.py
@@ -263,6 +263,13 @@ class Root(object):
# create rpmbuild dir
---
py/mock/backend.py |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/py/mock/backend.py b/py/mock/backend.py
index 2bc63df..6c9bb6e 100644
--- a/py/mock/backend.py
+++ b/py/mock/backend.py
@@ -263,6 +263,13 @@ class Root(object):
# create rpmbuild dir
Another try at this. I noticed I used the wrong variable and could have
wound up removing /etc/resolv.conf by accident.
--
Jes
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
---
py/mock/backend.py |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/py/mock/backend.py b/py/mock/backend.py
index 2bc63df..86b3fb7 100644
--- a/py/mock/backend.py
+++ b/py/mock/backend.py
@@ -263,6 +263,13 @@ class Root(object):
# create rpmbuild dir
Forwarded Message
From: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
To: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] Use hashlib if available instead of md5
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:18:32 -0500
This patch converts all calls of md5 function to use hashlib if present.
The old md5
not doing a good job.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 17:56 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 02:39 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
0001) Do not include boot.iso on any disc, per
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg02070.html
1 was already done upstream,
https
night. Good catch.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
that sigkey[13:17] works if
sigkey[0] is 0x88, but if 0 is 0x89, we have to go to 14:18.
This comes up a few times in koji code, so I thought some discussion was
in order before setting off to make a patch.
Is there anything better we can do instead of snaking raw data out of
headers?
--
Jesse
, right?
Yep! You got it now.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
into rpm upstream sources...
rpm itself only ever builds for one target at a time, so a script to
check to see if what was produced from one target build is different
from another target build doesn't necessarily make sense in rpm sources,
at least not something ran automated.
--
Jesse Keating
packages in the same run.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 14:53 -0500, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
2008/12/23 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 08:01 -0600, Joe Nall wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't clear. Not an interactive install.
Doesn't matter. Put the packages in the ks file you feed pungi and
they'll wind up
and pungi will make sure they're on the install
tree/media. Whether or not the user can select them during the initial
install is of no concern of Pungi's.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
of fonts.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
of them. Pungi uses the yum
repositories to make installable trees.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
. In other
words, it's forcing ownership, but not permissions.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:10 -0400, Mike McLean wrote:
[PATCH] internal setarch support for s390/s390x
Applied.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list
they don't belong.
But you're right, it may be on an srpm level not a subpackage level.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 00:49 -0400, Jens Petersen wrote:
How does that stop perl-Test-AutoBuild-darcs.noarch getting into ppc64
trees?
ExcludeArch
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
on it.)
Is there a white list or something this can be added to?
ifarch the things that depend on it.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora
with only x86_64 and noarch
rpms, I always seem to get the i386 rpms included. Can I do this with
pungi alone and not have to massage the build before I make the iso?
Add an --exclude *.i?86 in the repo lines in the kickstart file.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (http://jkeating.livejournal.com
== latest. Koji does not go by n-v-r, precisely so that
you could use tagging to back down a version or roll back a version.
The last tagged build always wins.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
you are composing against.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
location.
I chose the term as in a static location to the latest repo.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (http://jkeating.livejournal.com)
Fedora Project (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating)
GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
identi.ca
listed under a
commented section.
- Is it known to build a minimal cli distro installer correctly?
Provided the right things are in your manifest, yes.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 04:23 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
Hi, how I set pungi repo priorities ?
New pungi on fedora 9, give me an error about repo.priorities is a
NoneType
I thought I pushed an update for that. Check with either F9 updates or
F9 updates testing.
--
Jesse Keating
On Jun 14, 2008, at 1:52, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-722-7209 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
After tonight's updates, I do what I always do, pungify and
post. This time, I got the following.
Pungi.Gather:INFO: Adding repo fedora
Pungi.Gather:INFO: URL for repo fedora is
to the server it makes it rather hard to
do client updates.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
, now that everything is almost in sync, it would be a good time
to do another upstream release and push it to F8 as well.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list
, very long list[1]).
Yep. I'll be fixing this proper after F9 goes out by removing the
dependency of having these compose needs in the manifest. It'll allow
fully graphical installers for tiny package sets too.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
download (insert caching dances here) the packages it needs
in order to make install images. Then (well, still not sure of the step
orders) pungi would use it's manifest to create the package trees and
insert the produced images into the trees.
That's the fairly rough overview.
--
Jesse Keating
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 12:50 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
I found pungi does not require createrepo = 0.4.11, although it needs
that; attached is one of the smallest patches, ever ;-)
Thanks, I've applied upstream.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours
as a fastrack rhel 5
update. I'm not sure if CentOS does anything with those, but that
version of createrepo will be in RHEL 5.2. You really really need to be
running koji 1.2.3 on RHEL/CentOS5
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 23:37 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
fasttrack
For more fun and confusion, it's actually 'FasTrack'
http://www.redhat.com/rhn/rhndetails/fastrack/
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
, the
anaconda packages and a few other things. See the 'compose needs'
section on the shipped kickstart file.
Right now, pungi doesn't separate the things we need to compose from
things we want in the compose so you need to add those things into the
manifest.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my
want to install to iscsi, or support vnc
installs. Again, because pungi doesn't split out what you need to
compose the install media vs what you have as install choices on the
media, the media can get a bit bloaty. I just haven't come up with a
good way of expressing one vs the other.
--
Jesse
that be solved by making 'make tag' abort if there are
unchecked in files in the dir, particularly .spec ?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
watching only the xtrace.
You are correct. I had made an assumption based on what I had just
gone through with the kernel issue. I chased the wild goose of quoting
for a bit until we realized that xtrace just gets it wrong when
outputing when a file isn't found.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits
in the rpm script itself it doesn't have single quotes.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:54:34 -0500
Doug Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ sh -x foo.sh
+ cp 'missingfile/*' /tmp
cp: cannot stat `missingfile/*': No such file or directory
For completeness, please show 'foo.sh' (:
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:21:56 -0500
Doug Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The key here being that missingfile does not exist, which was the
root of my original issue.
Nod, speaking of that original issue, is it still an issue or was the
root cause found?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits
).
buildinstall does purport to supporting a TMPDIR setting, but when I've
tried to use that in the past with pungi it's lead to broken composes.
It's on my list to investigate and hopefully fix after the Alpha is
released.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
of weeks
https://fedorahosted.org/koji/changeset/6feae640c291ae24de8e855b8564ff786527dcb9
? Where there others as of yet not committed?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list
,
you'll want the build done in koji after that.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
find anything missing there.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:30:59 +0100
Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do you manage the patches in a way that this will not be forgotten or
do I have to remind you about this every now and then?
Looks like Dennis Gilmore applied this patch today.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits
--
1.5.3.8
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
From 51e2d69f9eac235bd5dfa4760aa5c2f3f3eec5ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:46:02 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Revert to getfile urls if the task is not successful (closed
KOJI_FLAGS are for.
KOJI_FLAGS=--nowait make scratch-build
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:48:53 +0100
Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From Makefile.common: The only occurence of KOJI_FLAGS:
BUILD_FLAGS ?= $(shell echo $(KOJI_FLAGS))
Ah right. I use KOJI_FLAGS with things like make build, I haven't
tried it with scratch.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:43:59 -0500
Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a few packages which use /dev/full to generate nospace left
or other such return values for the use in make check. We should
create that in mock. Here is a simple patch that adds it.
Actually I should say
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:02:40 -0500
Mike Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't that be os.makedev(1, 7)?
$ ls -la /dev/full
crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1, 7 2007-12-29 17:34 /dev/full
Good catch. I blindly copied from the /dev/null only looking at the
permissions.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:09:21 -0600
Michael E Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks fine to me to push.
Pushed.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:39:51 +0100
Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Koji sends a build failure notification which refers to non-existant
log file locations:
This is known and filed upstream as
https://fedorahosted.org/koji/ticket/71
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free
the issue and fix I came up with.
That's not a fix. You have to have anaconda-runtime installed, which
provides splittree. If you just don't import splittree, you won't be
able to produce split media.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP
it?)
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
This is for mock.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
From b935ce5cc96914d612fe746f65d06cb887373b9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:15:41 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Add --update call, to update existing buildroot
package manifest can drop anaconda-runtime and
a few other things. I just haven't done that work yet, and I'm not
planning to for F9.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list
/SecondStageInstallSource)
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:05:57 -0500
Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have: part iso --size=7
Needless to say, I've been playing with the size with no joy.
Ok. I'm perfectly willing to accept that there might be bugs in the
split media code path. I haven't used pungi to make
.fc8.noarch.rpm
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
haven't used pungi to make split media in
quite a few pungi releases (since Fedora doesn't create them) so I
could have screwed something up. I'll be testing that code path maybe
this weekend to see if I can figure out what's going on.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours
and perhaps
a newer createrepo package. Ideally we'd get the changes I've made
into koji beforehand so that we can release a new build of koji during
the refresh.
[1]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/rpm-metadata/2007-November/000812.html
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free
file.
What repos were you configured to use in your mock config? What
happens if you do a 'yum resolvedep krb5-devel' pointing to the repos
that are configured?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing
.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
spins and such inside mock. Getting some time
tests with that would be interesting.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
the static-repos over a costly data line instead of from
a local mirror or on disk cache.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
with obsolete=0 on yum.conf.i386.f7 , to see what
happens
What version of pungi are you using?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com
the same options (whether or not they do anything with all the
options doesn't matter). This way scm oddities are defined once per
scm in the callback definition, and the rest of the koji code just
calls generic scm_callback functions.
Make sense?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free
to lower bandwidth usage of
koji.fp.o if static-repos are enabled).
I think we need to work on yum plugin support in mock so that we can
fix this properly without continually futzing with regexes to just get
glibc and glibc-devel.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours
. It probably
does need looking into, something deep in the cvs branching scripts
we use. My cvs-fu isn't nearly that strong :(
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:03:29 -0400
Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This task is the one you're probably concerned with:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=89866name=srpm.log
I'm not entirely certain how that produced a .fc8 srpm at the end of
it, looking into it.
Bingo
that I can't right now.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
the work necessary there to target the next release as the first
release that supports $arch. There will be lots of changes needed to
packages to build for a new arch anyway and those changes might not be
wanted on a released branch.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours
arch using potentially vastly different ones.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
the repodata files?
Try completely cleaning out that buildroot (rm -rf after making sure
that nothing is mounted there, verify with /proc/mounts).
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:05:50 -0600
Phil Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Built using pungi-0.3.7-2 with a build system that worked great until
the yum update to 3.2.1-1.
Cross posting to fedora-buildsys-list.
A new yum is in updates-testing, please try with it.
--
Jesse Keating
Release
on the host doing the
compose, but in a repo that pungi is configured to use.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
to a change in the yum api. We're
testing a fix now that will create the headers directory if headers are
asked for, which is a work around until such time as nothing requests
the headers (if possible). An updated yum will fix this issue.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
signature.asc
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:43:15 -0400
Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seth has helped us track this down to a change in the yum api. We're
testing a fix now that will create the headers directory if headers
are asked for, which is a work around until such time as nothing
requests
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:55:29 -0600 (MDT)
William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-722-7209 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They seem to. I've now had two separate reports of success.
Interesting. Ok, now I'll have to see what changed in yum api to leave
pkgorder behind.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer
out why pkgorder is busted and either
work around it or fix it. Most likely we'll have to work around it
since pkgorder is in anaconda and that doesn't really get updates.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https
if things work better
with the older yum.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
config file it
points to by adding the updates repo (which wasn't available when I created
these config files...), and you'll automatically get updated versions of the
packages if they are available.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
pgpzmpNwlo0d2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora
to produce Fedora 7. Composing Fedora 6 with the pungi from
Fedora 7 will not work.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
pgpZADR4P7nSA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
of those days...
I think 2 is probably safest, if people have locally modified their configs,
but I was also thinking we'd only make this change in rawhide, so it would
only be rawhide people who get it, not pushing it out to existing Fedora/RHEL
setups, so 3 is probably fine too.
--
Jesse
for the above options would be (1), (3), (2).
In fact, if you go with (3), it makes sense to me to change the
default after F7 is dropped rather than FC6. F7 continues to use a
buildgroups repo/RPM, correct?
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
pgpbMIxGnh6A7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo