Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-08 Thread Bryce
Oliver Falk wrote: Jesse Keating wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 17:23 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: OKOK. I thought rpmbuild will automagically produce arch-specific and noarch packages in 'one step'... It will, for one arch. You do a rpmbuild --rebuild foo (on x86_64) and it'll spit out x86_64

Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-08 Thread Jesse Keating
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 08:42 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: Alright. I got it now - I think :-) So a build in koji will produce a noarch package for every arch. And then you need to decide which noarch package to take and how to find out if there are (arch specific) differences in those

Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-07 Thread Oliver Falk
Mike Bonnet wrote: On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 21:51 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: Hi Mike! Mike Bonnet schrieb: I've just created tickets for a few Koji features that I've been wanting to implement for a while (as well as updated an old one), and I'm planning to devote some time to in the near future.

Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-07 Thread Oliver Falk
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: OF == Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at writes: OF And regarding your point: '... different arches build noarch OF subpackage with different contents'. Well, then it's definitly not OF *noarch*, is't it? :-) It is quite possible for the contents to differ by, say,

Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-07 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:08 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: Yet another post install section processing script (YAPISPS) :-) And yes, if it's not really noarch, it should fail. But shouldn't rpm itself check that? I mean, if someone writes a script to check that it should possibly go directly

Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-07 Thread Oliver Falk
Jesse Keating wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:08 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: Yet another post install section processing script (YAPISPS) :-) And yes, if it's not really noarch, it should fail. But shouldn't rpm itself check that? I mean, if someone writes a script to check that it should

Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-07 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 17:23 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: OKOK. I thought rpmbuild will automagically produce arch-specific and noarch packages in 'one step'... It will, for one arch. You do a rpmbuild --rebuild foo (on x86_64) and it'll spit out x86_64 binary packages and potentially a noarch

Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-07 Thread Oliver Falk
Jesse Keating wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 17:23 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: OKOK. I thought rpmbuild will automagically produce arch-specific and noarch packages in 'one step'... It will, for one arch. You do a rpmbuild --rebuild foo (on x86_64) and it'll spit out x86_64 binary packages and

Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-06 Thread Mike Bonnet
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 21:51 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: Hi Mike! Mike Bonnet schrieb: I've just created tickets for a few Koji features that I've been wanting to implement for a while (as well as updated an old one), and I'm planning to devote some time to in the near future. If you have

Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-06 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
OF == Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at writes: OF And regarding your point: '... different arches build noarch OF subpackage with different contents'. Well, then it's definitly not OF *noarch*, is't it? :-) It is quite possible for the contents to differ by, say, date, or by timestamps being

Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-06 Thread Mike Bonnet
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 15:21 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: OF == Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at writes: OF And regarding your point: '... different arches build noarch OF subpackage with different contents'. Well, then it's definitly not OF *noarch*, is't it? :-) It is quite

Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-06 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
MB == Mike Bonnet mi...@redhat.com writes: MB There is some set of post-build checks we may want to run on these MB noarch subpackages to ensure they are in fact noarch, and that MB their content is sane. I think it would be sufficient to collect all of the noarch packages generated from the