Hi
As far as I know, you cannot do what you want easily. Yes, you can have
contains relations between the objects, but since the XACML engine
does not yet allow you to address relations, these are invisible to the
security system.
And yes, you can have object level security policies, but not any
Hi
I reported this a way back. They are in the process of restructuring the
system to use maven, so this issue will not be handled at this point of
time.
https://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-506
Regards
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 02:00 +0200, carsten.friedr...@csiro.au wrote:
It seems
) 613-6831
david.kenn...@duke.edu
From:
Asger Askov Blekinge
a...@statsbiblioteket.dk
To:
Peter Cliff
peter.cl...@ouls.ox.ac.uk
Cc:
Schwichtenberg, Frank
frank.schwichtenb...@fiz
Without knowing what you have modified, I cannot help you. I have some
guesses, but could you show us the change?
Regards
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 23:45 +0100, carsten.friedr...@csiro.au wrote:
I’m trying to launch a version of the fedora server which I modified
to add an additional service to
Hi
This is not so far away from what I did with Enhanced Content Models. I
am surprised you did not reference that in any way. Anyway.
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 01:20 +0100, Chris Wilper wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Benjamin Armintor armin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Aron and all
I have read your proposal with great interest. As we could establish on
the committers meetings, I have been thinking along the same lines. You
have been doing most of the work for me, which makes me glad. I hope you
too will be glad, when I piggyback what you started.
You
rollback(DigitalObject oldVers,
DigitalObject newVers);
}
This way, if one of the synchronous stores fail an update, the rest of
them can roll back to before the update.
Regards
Asger
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 15:05 +0100, Asger Askov Blekinge wrote:
Hi Aron and all
I have
After looking at the source tree, it should be in
fcrepo-client-admin-3.3.jar
It should be in the client folder in a standard install. Does that solve
your problem, or should I look further?
Regards
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:25 +0100, Asger Askov Blekinge wrote:
Hi
Without looking, which I
Hi
I have been following this discussion with great interest.
Firstly I support the promotion of policies to first class objects. It
brings several advantages to Fedora
1. An easy way to provide metadata about a policy (as the first class
object can of course have other datastreams)
2. An
, these are a separate issue,
but repository policies are not.
Regards
On 12 Feb 2010, at 1:50 PM, Asger Askov Blekinge wrote:
Hi
I have been following this discussion with great interest.
Firstly I support the promotion of policies to first class objects. It
brings several advantages to Fedora
1
I know of no distribution that should be superior to any other. Fedora
is a java web applications, these tend to be quite indifferent to the
underlying system.
Please note that Fedora must run inside a servlet container (like
Tomcat) These servlet containers might have varying performance on
it is optional=true, as I do not think the optional=true is valid
xml.
If there is a real demand for optional=true and it is valid xml, I would
be happy to put it in. It will not make it for the 3.4 Release
candidate, but it could make it for the full release. But really, I
would prefer it if we
+1 Seconded. The Rest api functions are well thought out, but the stuff
sent to the user is generated by appending strings, and error handling
is not to easy, if you do not use Java.
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 02:55 +0200, Scott Prater wrote:
Below are some comments from one of my developer
Yes, I found that one. But thanks for validating it :)
That the stream is not closed is a bug, but has anyone actually tested
that this solves the problem? There might be other not-closed streams,
so I do not want to mark the bug as CLOSED before I know we have found
them all.
Regards
On Wed,
it.
In my test with lsof, that was the only file that remained open after
each call.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Asger Askov Blekinge
a...@statsbiblioteket.dk wrote:
Yes, I found that one. But thanks for validating it :)
That the stream is not closed is a bug, but has anyone actually
Welcome Scott. Nice to have you on the team :)
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 17:28 +0200, Chris Wilper wrote:
Hi all,
On behalf of the FC Repository Development Team, I'd like to welcome
Scott Prater (University of Wisconsin - Madison) as the newest Fedora
committer. He was nominated last week and
I think this is a bug. Try to drop the database, then rebuild, and then
start up the server. Fedora gets mad, if the base objects stay in the
database, but I do not think they will be included in a rebuild. Perhaps
they will, I am not sure.
Regards
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 19:58 +0100, Henk van den
Sounds about right, but this is not a hard limit.
As you know, Fedora stores the datastreams in one big xml file.
What is the maximum size of xml files? How many elements can there be in
an xml list? How long do you want to wait for fedora to parse this
object? Those are the relevant questions,
either just keep going for now, or we could perform our own fix.
I just felt people ought to know
Regards
Asger Askov Blekinge
Fedora Committer
--
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
I suspect the extra PermGen space is being taken up by autogenerated
classes. Depending on how the soap interface is constructed, there are a
number of classes that are not generated until you actually call a soap
method. These MIGHT only live in the session, and thus be discarded and
Hi Steve
Well, you could do this with decorators at the moment. Having both
decorators and special validation decorators in the spring config file
is somewhat messy, I think. Have you removed the decorators?
Do you hook the data change itself, or the API method? If the API
method, how does
21 matches
Mail list logo
