Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
Maybe it's a good time to make it bootable then?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182008
I also have heard nothing from the Xorg bugzilla regarding making the
nv driver work:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182396
Then
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 22:26 -0700, Stanton Finley wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178143
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182147
These appear to be machine specific, and need a fix from the machine
provider. Not sure if this is something we
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 01:14 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 22:26 -0700, Stanton Finley wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178143
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182147
These appear to be machine specific, and need a fix
Thomas J. Baker wrote:
I filed this back on Feb 23rd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182653
Thanks. Somehow missed it in my queries. Is this still reproducible for you?
--
Rahul
Warning: Frustration rant follows.
More and more over time, I am noticing a tendency of bug reporters
adding log files, config files and other large files to bug reports
by cutting and pasting these massive files into the comment box,
instead of attaching them as proper bugzilla file
Updated Packages:
anaconda-11.0.2-1
-
* Wed Mar 08 2006 Jeremy Katz ka...@redhat.com - 11.0.2-1
- error handling on fs label reading (#184412)
- add sis190 driver
- remove no-longer shipped lvm2-cluster on upgrade (pjones)
avahi-0.6.9-3
-
* Wed Mar 08 2006 Bill
I've been struggling trying to get my USB bluetooth dongle to work on
my i586 based MiniITX since I started trying FC5 (Test 3).
The same BT dongle worked fine under the old FC4 installation.
From what I can see, in the installed i586 kernel (2.6.15-1.2025_FC5)
the drivers and
On 3/9/06, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Stanton Finley wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 01:14 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 22:26 -0700, Stanton Finley wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178143
opened bug 184486
gnome-applets-1:2.13.90-6
-
* Wed Mar 08 2006 Ray Strode rstr...@redhat.com - 2.13.90-6
- improve package installation time by running gconftool-2 only
once in %post
* Wed Mar 08 2006 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 2.13.90-5
- Fix a crash in the mixer
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 11:37 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
opened bug 184486
If you've opened a bug, you don't need to send an email to this list
about it. Or if you do, at least add a proper URL so people can just
click on it to see the bug.
Otherwise, it's just noise.
thx,
josh
same here
Neal Becker wrote:
same here
same here
--
Regards,
Old Fart
(my reply-to address is munged to defeat spambots)
Is NM compatible with a local caching nameserver? It looks like the default
NM setup is to set resolv.conf from dhcp. If I want to cache results
locally, how can I do this?
On 3/8/06, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Paul F. Johnson wrote:
Oh, Paul F.J., did you get around to add this RPM to Extras? (can't
find the bugzilla entry in case you did)
Is it worth putting Qt4 into extras as it's sooner or later going to be
in core?
I have no problem
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:28:16AM +, Brian wrote:
I've been struggling trying to get my USB bluetooth dongle to work on
my i586 based MiniITX since I started trying FC5 (Test 3).
The same BT dongle worked fine under the old FC4 installation.
From what I can see,
With the pkg-config bug though I'd say the package is slightly broken
as you can't use autotools to detect the library (well, I guess you
can, but pkg-config is much the preferred solution). No suggestions
for a fix?
I'm currently adding some sed stuff to the spec to go over all the .pc
On Thursday 09 March 2006 08:04, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Is NM compatible with a local caching nameserver? It looks like the default
NM setup is to set resolv.conf from dhcp. If I want to cache results
locally, how can I do this?
You need to enable the named and dhcdbd
Has anyone been encountering stability issues with firefox? Seems to
segfault randomly when trying to download. Also a few times loading
pages.
-Louis
On 3/9/06, Louis E Garcia II louis...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Has anyone been encountering stability issues with firefox? Seems to
segfault randomly when trying to download. Also a few times loading
pages.
did you install any additional extentions or plugins?
-jef
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 13:18:17 -0500 Mike A. Harris wrote
A developer however, thinks of the priority of a given bug, based
on what all work is on their plate, including bug fixing, development,
Fedora work, RHEL work, other work projects, etc., and schedules their
time based on that. Any
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 23:27 +0100, wieseltux23 wrote:
www.wolfspakt.de/spiel.php?id=7358
um, wtf?
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
signature.asc
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 03:04 -0500, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
Then there's the minor inconvenience of gnome-netstatus being broken
with my atheros chip:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179406
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181861
We don't ship an Atheros
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 22:26 -0700, Stanton Finley wrote:
And these:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178143
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182147
Almost certainly a BIOS bug in both cases.
--
Peter
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 23:39 -0700, Stanton Finley wrote:
This then begs the question why do the FC2, FC3, and FC4 installation
media boot and install on the same machine without incident? What's
different about the FC5 installation image kernel and can it be fixed?
Because the behavior of the
Peter Jones wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 03:04 -0500, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
Then there's the minor inconvenience of gnome-netstatus being broken
with my atheros chip:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179406
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181861
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 12:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thomas J. Baker wrote:
I filed this back on Feb 23rd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182653
Thanks. Somehow missed it in my queries. Is this still reproducible for you?
--
Rahul
Seems
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 18:31 -0500, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
Note that the Atheros driver from madwifi worked fine, and previously
the gnome-netstatus applet was also functional with it. It was broken
during the FC testing cycle.
Yeah, NetworkManager worked fine for some time on madwifi-ng and
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:44:51AM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
I don't quite understand what makes writing an external script and then
modifying it from the specfile better than just emitting the script
completely from the .spec in %prep, given that the script will usually
be just a few lines.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perldl is unable to load the documentaion and demo files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163219
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 09:02 -0600, Steven Pritchard wrote:
fighting sourceforge's CVS).
OT: in case you didn't know, SourceForge now offers Subversion too. I
switched one project over and have been very pleased so far. *knocks
wood* https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=544830
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl-RPM2 installs into site_perl; should set INSTALLDIRS=vendor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=151194
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl-RPM2 installs into site_perl; should set INSTALLDIRS=vendor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=151194
--- Additional Comments From
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl-Convert-ASN1: update request to 0.20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184539
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
34 matches
Mail list logo
