On 05/23/2009 12:26 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
package: gnote-0.1.2-2.fc12.i586 from dist-f12-build-current-i386
Fixed by building a new upstream release - gnote 0.4.0
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Hi
My packaging survey turned up a interesting suggestion
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-May/msg01809.html
We don't currently have any guidelines covering this but considering the
Debian action to hot babe
http://lwn.net/Articles/113644/
I wanted to asked first, is this
Michael Fleming mflem...@thatfleminggent.com wrotes:
MF Hm. interesting case.
MF I've got no problem with it. Unlike hot-babe there's nothing even
MF remotely resembling depiction here.
personally I am torn between 'go' and 'no-go'
the guidelines says:
Content must not be pornographic, or
I've got no problem with it. Unlike hot-babe there's nothing even
remotely resembling depiction here.
It's essentially a download tool a la aria2/d4x/gwget with a particular
focus/niche and in my opinion fairly innocuous. The author is pretty
up-front about what it is and what it's for - if
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 03:13:32PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
My packaging survey turned up a interesting suggestion
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-May/msg01809.html
We don't currently have any guidelines covering this but considering the
Debian action to hot
Hi!
Here is my problem: I am trying to Fedora LIVE USB boot properly X on
vx800 chipset/Chrome9 integrated GPU on VED8900 netbook (VIA OpenBook
reference design). Default driver \openchrome\ because of
unsupported vx800 can\'t do that. Only some snv version of this driver
can boot X correctly.
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) boche...@fedoraproject.org wrotes:
MB And it looks like we have a precedent...
MB https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/p0rn-comfort
mh, cool! ;-)
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen aus dem schönen Hainzell
Simon Wesp
The G in GNU stands for GNU
On 5/28/09, Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/28/2009 12:44 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
Hi all,
If you want one, review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021
Kushal
It hope in different kind of pony but I'll take the review.
--
Marcela Mašláňová
BaseOS team
On 05/28/2009 03:23 PM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3d) wrote:
Would a cc to legal be in order?
As a just in case.
It is blocking FE-Legal already.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:18 +, Kristaps Viesalgs wrote:
Hi!
Here is my problem: I am trying to Fedora LIVE USB boot properly X on
vx800 chipset/Chrome9 integrated GPU on VED8900 netbook (VIA OpenBook
reference design). Default driver \openchrome\ because of
unsupported vx800 can\'t do
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 10:48 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:18 +, Kristaps Viesalgs wrote:
Hi!
Here is my problem: I am trying to Fedora LIVE USB boot properly X on
vx800 chipset/Chrome9 integrated GPU on VED8900 netbook (VIA OpenBook
reference design). Default
On 05/27/2009 01:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 15:07 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
I can't wait to see how we depsolve through:
yum update:
- foo is updated and recommends bar
- bar conflicts with baz which is also in the update
but I'm sure we'll muddle through - provided
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 10:48 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Is Fedora planning to make for
VIA graphic chipset autoconfiguration utility? It would be very very
useful.
Why would we do that when we could just package a version of the driver
that just works?
Or to put it a different way, we
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 07:54 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 05/27/2009 01:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 15:07 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
I can't wait to see how we depsolve through:
yum update:
- foo is updated and recommends bar
- bar conflicts with baz which
A late discovered and just potentially fixed anaconda storage bug[1] has
necessitated another week slip of our schedule. The change is important
but invasive enough to require re-validating our storage tests. We were
already late in producing the Release Candidate and there is not enough
time to
On 05/28/2009 01:06 PM, Simon Wesp wrote:
Michael Flemingmflem...@thatfleminggent.com wrotes:
MF Hm. interesting case.
MF I've got no problem with it. Unlike hot-babe there's nothing even
MF remotely resembling depiction here.
personally I am torn between 'go' and 'no-go'
the guidelines
Well, I have nothing on the agenda for tomorrow's meeting at this
point. Thus, the entire meeting taking place at 17:00UTC in
#fedora-meeting will be an open floor, unless someone comes up with
something to discuss between now and then :).
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 10:48 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Is Fedora planning to make for
VIA graphic chipset autoconfiguration utility? It would be very very
useful.
Why would we do that when we could just package a version of the driver
that just works?
Or to put it
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499768
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-05-28 04:07:45 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-05-28 04:06:59 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-05-28 04:05:25 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499768
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-05-28 04:13:52 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502364
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499768
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-05-28 04:14:46 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499768
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489825
Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
29 matches
Mail list logo
