Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com schrieb:
I've added a nopaste sub-package to perl-App-Nopaste in devel, F-11,
and F-10 that should provide a seamless upgrade for existing users. It
supports multiple pastebins and provides redundancy; if one site goes
down, it just tries another one.
Thank you
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Ray Strode wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 13:50 -0400, Ray Strode wrote:
It seems to me it'd make sense to convert all these kinds of snippets
into macros. Am I right, or is there a reason
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jon Mastersjonat...@jonmasters.org wrote:
The Intel HDA driver on here doesn't appear to be in your badlist any
more, but maybe I am wrong:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High
Definition Audio Controller (rev 02)
Because HDA is
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:37:51 -0300, Paulo wrote:
I have the .src.rprm for audacious2, here:
http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/repoview/audacious.html
http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/repoview/audacious-plugins.html
Note that Audacious 2 has changed to GPLv3 and that the old Fedora
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 11:23 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Heya,
Yesterday, I was browsing Ubuntu's Blueprints for their next release,
and saw this:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Richard Dawe wrote:
Good afternoon,
I'm the current maintainer of the planet package, but I don't have to
maintain it anymore.
I am there going to orphan the planet packages.
I've taken ownership of it.
thanks,
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 13:50 -0400, Ray Strode wrote:
It seems to me it'd make sense to convert all these kinds of snippets
into macros. Am I right, or is there a reason against doing this?
It would be awesome to
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:41 PM, David Nalleyda...@gnsa.us wrote:
I think that's an outstanding idea, and I'd be willing to work towards
such an end, and perhaps since there is such a prevalence of php we
can get some buy-in from the php-sig as well. To illustrate some of
the usefulness - I
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 15:47 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Panu Matilainen wrote:
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who replies to himself :)
Also for ultimate power the file triggers need to be in headers so that all
triggers are ready for action before the
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 12:34 +0200, drago01 wrote:
So I think the gnome-scan interface is nice but if my results are
reproduced by others, we can't really replace xsane with it until it's a
bit less buggy. It would be nice if any coders with scanning interest
could contribute to the code I
yersinia wrote:
In @rpm5.org, yes.
rpm5.org is not the upstream for Fedora's RPM.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
King InuYasha wrote:
Then don't use FFmpeg. And since Moonlight itself will not contain the MS
codec pack, it can still fit in main Fedora repositories.
So you're suggesting we should promote the proprietary M$
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:31:23 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
it seems to me that this is a bit of a silly approach - it encourages
cut and paste errors (or people cutting and pasting non-canonical blocks
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:02:11 -0700,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
They'll have access to the updates and updates-testing repo, just not
the 'fedora' repo. It is a bit of an inconvenience for users for a few
days.
At the rate some mirrors sync, they'll probably be a public
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
yersinia wrote:
In @rpm5.org, yes.
rpm5.org is not the upstream for Fedora's RPM.
Sure, but it is only for info. Anyway it is only for MANDRIVA vendor in
configure. Exists so many rpm fork in place in the world.
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 11:49 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:31:23 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
it seems to me that this is a bit of a silly approach - it encourages
cut and
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:41 PM, David Nalleyda...@gnsa.us wrote:
I think that's an outstanding idea, and I'd be willing to work towards
such an end, and perhaps since there is such a prevalence of php we
can get some
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 10:27:51AM -0400, Nigel Jones wrote:
Fedora 12 Release Name Community Vote:
---
This community vote has been setup to choose the release name for
Fedora 12.
The choices for this vote were selected using community
2009/6/5 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com:
They'll have access to the updates and updates-testing repo, just not
the 'fedora' repo. It is a bit of an inconvenience for users for a few
days.
It's possible that a new version of a package in updates(-testing)
depends on a core package that
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-Amazon/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9840/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Net-Amazon.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Jun 06 2009 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.51-1
- update to latest upstream
Index:
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-Amazon/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9840/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Net-Amazon.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Jun 06 2009 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.51-1
- update to latest upstream
Index:
21 matches
Mail list logo
