On Jun 22, 2009, at 1:08, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 04:56:07PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
I *wish* it made a difference. I did an upgrade am an left with a
host
of fc10 packages because the fc11 ones weren't considered newer.
For example people
On 06/22/2009 12:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Not possible while we allow people to keep making updates to the older
releases. Those updates quickly become version ( not just release even
) higher than the static copies on the release medium and repos.
Is there any proposed solution to this
On 22/06/09 08:24, Jesse Keating wrote:
That's messed up. We used to check just before release time that this
situation never occured. It should probably be added to the rel-eng
release checklist if it isn't there already.
Dave
Not possible while we allow people to keep making updates
On Jun 22, 2009, at 9:26, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On 06/22/2009 12:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Not possible while we allow people to keep making updates to the
older
releases. Those updates quickly become version ( not just release
even
) higher than the
On Jun 22, 2009, at 9:29, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/06/09 08:24, Jesse Keating wrote:
That's messed up. We used to check just before release time that
this
situation never occured. It should probably be added to the rel-eng
release checklist if it isn't there
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:31 +0200, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Jun 22, 2009, at 9:26, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On 06/22/2009 12:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Not possible while we allow people to keep making updates to the
older
releases. Those updates quickly
On 22/06/09 08:32, Jesse Keating wrote:
Maybe, freeze all updates nearing a GA,
And keep them frozen indefinitely?
--
Jes
Duh!, forgot the coffee.
That would get the early adopters,
then nearing EOL of current eg 9.
Only allow updates for 11.
Same when 10 is EOL.
Just update most
On Jun 22, 2009, at 9:38, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/06/09 08:32, Jesse Keating wrote:
Maybe, freeze all updates nearing a GA,
And keep them frozen indefinitely?
--
Jes
Duh!, forgot the coffee.
That would get the early adopters,
then nearing EOL of current eg 9.
On 06/22/2009 01:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
If you have any ideas I'd like to hear them. A super epoch has already
been suggested but that just masks the problem and may cause unwanted
downgrades. Any solution either involves severly limiting what kind of
updates can be done or requiring
On 22/06/09 03:15, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Carl Byington wrote:
My libpst package BuildRequires boost-devel, which works on older
systems (centos4 thru fedora 10), but for fedora 11 and devel, it
needs BuildRequires boost-python-devel. What is the preferred .spec
code to achieve that?
Something
Just a notice, if your package requires XInput.h to build, you will need to
change the BuildRequires from xorg-x11-proto-devel to libXi. The header file
has moved there.
Reason: it's the library header file and shouldn't have been in the proto
package in the first place (this applies to upstream
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:14:55PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/22/2009 01:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
If you have any ideas I'd like to hear them. A super epoch has already
been suggested but that just masks the problem and may cause unwanted
downgrades. Any solution either involves
On 06/22/2009 04:49 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I think you mean before pushing rather than signing, but this idea has been
suggested before.
Well, if you aren't going to push anyway, then signing it wouldn't be
that useful, right? A koji build can be a trigger for the script check
instead of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are still packagers who bump %version or %release
in old dist updates without considering the consequences with regard to
dist upgrades.
I think this is the real problem
If this hits yum or any package yum depends on you have no chance for
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 04:53:10PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/22/2009 04:49 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I think you mean before pushing rather than signing, but this idea has been
suggested before.
Well, if you aren't going to push anyway, then signing it wouldn't be
that useful, right?
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 18:15 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
You'll also want to watch out for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506189
Good times!
Uggg...
- Gilboa
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 06/21/2009 05:56 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:50 AM, John W. Linvillelinvi...@redhat.com wrote:
If a tool needs something to perform one of its functions it needs it.
There isn't a anaconda-no-wireless package, etc.
This speaks deeply to a cultural
If a tool needs something to perform one of its functions it needs it.
There isn't a anaconda-no-wireless package, etc.
This speaks deeply to a cultural understanding as to what the concept
of networking is.
It seems obvious there are people who would like to consider wireless
as
On 06/22/2009 05:35 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Isn't the scripts Michael Schwendt refers to, not useful anymore? Even
It's useful. It's generally after the fact though, and in the long run I
think
we want to be proactive, not reactive.
I agree but we aren't even reacting much now. If the
I'm currently packaging some PHP classes: if I follow the packaging
guideline at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#File_Placement,
class files should appear directly in /usr/share/php, not in an
extension-specific sub-directory.
This seems rather rude: this rule will sooner or later
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 06:20:07PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/22/2009 05:35 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Isn't the scripts Michael Schwendt refers to, not useful anymore? Even
It's useful. It's generally after the fact though, and in the long run I
think
we want to be proactive, not
Le Lun 22 juin 2009 15:26, Josh Boyer a écrit :
True. Care to file a rel-eng ticket suggesting we setup a cronjob to
do so?
The script will likely need some rework and it may take some time, but
the
ticket is a good starting point.
Can a ticket be opened to run other periodic checks for
On 06/22/2009 06:56 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 06:20:07PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/22/2009 05:35 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Isn't the scripts Michael Schwendt refers to, not useful anymore? Even
It's useful. It's generally after the fact though, and in the long run I
There will be an outage starting at 2009-06-23 20:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 2 and a half hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2009-06-23 20:00 UTC'
Affected Services:
CVS / Source Control
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 13:01 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 21/06/09 12:57, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Someone already requested this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480558
Good
Why does it bother you? The package is not that big.
It's not about size, it's about making
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 13:59 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 12:14 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
Why does yum erase wireless-tools want to:
Removing for dependencies:
anaconda
firstboot
rhpl
system-config-(boot,date,date-docs,firewall,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:55:04 -0400,
Jan Chadima jchad...@redhat.com wrote:
I need to create rpm package with cca 50-100 tiny files inside. The
whole tree is about 2-3GB binary data. Koji dies with error: Unable to
create immutable header region. There are existing bug
Fedora
Glen Turner (g...@gdt.id.au) said:
On 19/06/09 00:19, Bill Nottingham wrote:
No, period - I haven't seen anyone in the community say that they're
testing it on i586-class hardware.
Hi Bill,
Your wiki page has some jargon (i586) which I'm trying
to reduce to manufacturer products, as you
No, period - I haven't seen anyone in the community say that they're
testing it on i586-class hardware.
Hi Bill,
Your wiki page has some jargon (i586) which I'm trying
to reduce to manufacturer products, as you have already
done for the AMD products.
F12 x86 will not work on i586 (or
Horst H. von Brand (vonbr...@inf.utfsm.cl) said:
Rawhide Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Compose started at Sun Jun 21 06:15:09 UTC 2009
Here (x86_64) yum tries to install a raft of *.i586 packages without
matching *.x86_64 (like libfprint-0.1.0-8.pre2.fc12). Almost nothing is
Le 22/06/2009 16:46, Christopher Stone a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Patrick MONNERATp...@datasphere.ch wrote:
fedora-php-devel-list or fedora-packaging are better place for this
discussion, already raised (by me) in :
-
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Dave Jonesda...@redhat.com wrote:
Considering these updates are supposed to be for our 'stable' release,
having them be in $nextrelease first seems like a good idea anyway.
including rawhide?
Do you want security fix updates to block on rawhide not composing in
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 07:46 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
Hi Chris,
You're supposed to be using subdirectories under /usr/share/php.
Many thanks for precising it.
The guidelines just need to be re-worded.
Oh yes, please do !
Thanks for the reply
Regards,
Patrick
--
fedora-devel-list
Why can't you just leave it as-is?
I mean is 1% improvement (for cpu intensive workload) really worth
changing anything?
Instead of messing arround with stuff like that, I guess a lot of code
would benefit of beeing build with profile driven optimizations, which
often yields a 5-15% improvement
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:18:39 -0400, Tom wrote:
Jeff Spaleta writes:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
Considering these updates are supposed to be for our 'stable' release,
having them be in $nextrelease first seems like a good idea anyway.
including rawhide?
Yes,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
in the Fedora Weekly News there was an announcement about
the new community portal for Fedora.
After I have taken a first look, I want to make the following
suggestion.
It may be helpful if you can see on the user profile, if the user
are a
On Jun 22, 2009, at 18:32, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:31:32AM +0200, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Jun 22, 2009, at 9:26, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On 06/22/2009 12:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Not possible while we allow people to
Clemens Eisserer linuxhi...@gmail.com writes:
I mean is 1% improvement (for cpu intensive workload) really worth
changing anything?
No, especially if it screws somebody (not me though).
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Our Spins SIG meetings have been pretty poorly attended recently (just nirik
and I) and our Spins Wrangler for F11 has resigned from that position for F12.
nirik does not have time to take a more active role and I want to limit
my work in the Spins SIG to technical stuff and the Games Spin. I
Jan Chadima wrote:
Hello All
I need to create rpm package with cca 50-100 tiny files inside. The
whole tree is about 2-3GB binary data. Koji dies with error: Unable to
create immutable header region. There are existing bug
One million files means (at 4KiB per file even if its length
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 08:16:30AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 08:04:21AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:49:14PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 14:08 +1000, Bradley Baetz wrote:
Hi,
Running F11 (x86_64), I've noticed that not
I am the maintainer of the Live Games Spin and am looking for feedback
on dealing with games (though this could apply to other types of packages
as well) that have some of their content obtained using autodownloader.
Currently I don't want to include games that can only be played using
downloaded
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Mouse/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12140
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Mouse.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jun 22 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.25-1
- auto-update to 0.25 (by cpan-spec-update 0.01)
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Mouse/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15393
Modified Files:
perl-Mouse.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jun 22 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.25-1
- auto-update to 0.25 (by cpan-spec-update 0.01)
- altered
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Mouse/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15459
Modified Files:
perl-Mouse.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jun 22 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.25-1
- auto-update to 0.25 (by cpan-spec-update 0.01)
- altered
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416781
--- Comment #7 from Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com 2009-06-22 03:39:20
EDT ---
Confirming fixed in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506496
Jan Safranek jsafr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Pod-Abstract/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3657
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Pod-Abstract.spec
Log Message:
* Mon Jun 08 2009 Marcela MaÅ¡láÅová mmasl...@redhat.com 0.17-2
-
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Pod-Abstract/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5882
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Pod-Abstract.spec
Log Message:
* Mon Jun 08 2009 Marcela MaÅ¡láÅová mmasl...@redhat.com 0.17-2
-
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-JSON/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7631
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-JSON.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jun 22 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2.15-1
- auto-update to 2.15 (by cpan-spec-update 0.01)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491536
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-06-22 13:02:29 EDT ---
perl-Tk-804.028-8.fc10 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489228
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-06-22 13:02:23 EDT ---
perl-Tk-804.028-8.fc10 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489228
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-06-22 13:03:14 EDT ---
perl-Tk-804.028-8.fc11 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506496
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-06-22 13:02:35 EDT ---
perl-Tk-804.028-8.fc10 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491536
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-06-22 13:03:19 EDT ---
perl-Tk-804.028-8.fc11 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506496
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-06-22 13:03:24 EDT ---
perl-Tk-804.028-8.fc11 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487122
--- Comment #2 from Ieuan Clay ieuan.c...@bbsrc.ac.uk 2009-06-22 13:08:09
EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491536
--- Comment #15 from Need Real Name l...@nodata.co.uk 2009-06-22 13:14:25
EDT ---
WFM THANKS!
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Garbled text terminal display
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507490
Summary: Garbled text terminal display
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504389
Bernard Johnson bjohn...@symetrix.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507490
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-JSON/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13487
Modified Files:
perl-JSON.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Jun 22 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2.15-1
- auto-update to 2.15 (by cpan-spec-update 0.01)
Index:
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Moose/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19148
Modified Files:
perl-Moose.spec
Log Message:
* Mon Jun 22 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.81-2
- split off Test::Moose
Index: perl-Moose.spec
63 matches
Mail list logo
