On 06/23/2009 08:26 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
For example the quake3 package is needed for some games in
Fedora, but it makes menu items for some games that are only playable with
large downloads.
No. It doesn't. Check again.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Dennis Gilmoreden...@ausil.us wrote:
EPEL is now using koji to build instead of plague. please make sure that you
update th common directory in your checkout to pick up the needed changes to
submit builds.
Bodhi support will come early next week to issue
Rex Dieter wrote:
See also:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494084
Which led to aspell-en conditional being added to comps
(Unfortunately, that doesn't help all cases)
IMHO the Requires: aspell-en should come back. English is the default
everywhere (*), I think it's a
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
I've opened a movie in totem, the main volume level is somewhere in the
range of 70%, however totem is at about 4%. The movie is too quiet so
I've upped the volume in totem to 19%. The main volume is now 84%. All
fine and good. However if I modify the main volume at
David Zeuthen wrote:
(I'm not subscribed to fedora-devel so if you want replies from me don't
remove me from the Cc.)
Hmmm, I can't directly CC folks through Gmane, the best I can do is to use
the KNode feature which copies the text into KMail.
An example where 1. is useful includes, funny
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 08:25:16PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Christoph Wickert wrote:
What happened to these updates?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5739
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5966
Is it a bodhi failure or a human one (both
- Optimize for Atom
I also don't get this one. Why not optimize for the cpu architectur in
use by most fedora-x86 users, like p4 or c2d?
It seems crazy to optimize for a cpu with maybe 5% market share, just
because its the only x86 cpu left. (by the way, the via C7 is still
sold too).
- Clemens
Clemens Eisserer (linuxhi...@gmail.com) said:
- Optimize for Atom
I also don't get this one. Why not optimize for the cpu architectur in
use by most fedora-x86 users, like p4 or c2d?
It seems crazy to optimize for a cpu with maybe 5% market share, just
because its the only x86 cpu left.
On 06/23/2009 11:36 PM, topdog wrote:
Author: topdog
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/php-pecl-geoip/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2525/devel
On the commits mailing list, instead of the author name at the From
field, I see only a nick name. Why is that?
Rahul
--
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:49 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
I've opened a movie in totem, the main volume level is somewhere in the
range of 70%, however totem is at about 4%. The movie is too quiet so
I've upped the volume in totem to 19%. The main volume is now 84%.
1) Optimizing for P4 is ... messy
2) If you're using C2D, etc., you can already use the 64-bit distro.
So why not stay with generic, where most users would benefit.
Sure I could use 64-bit, as could all the others using 32-bit on
64-bit capable CPUs (I guess 50% of all fedora-x86 users).
-
On 06/24/2009 01:42 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Mathieu Bridon
(bochecha)boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
RPM has seen a lot of improvements in speed and memory consumption
Are there any improvements on recovery of unexpectedly failed
transactions, such as
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/24/2009 01:42 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Mathieu Bridon
(bochecha)boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
RPM has seen a lot of improvements in speed and memory consumption
Are there any improvements on recovery
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Seth Vidalskvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
they're not insolvable - they are just very very very hard.
:-)
At the end of the day, if the OS doesn't give you atomic multi-file
transactions, and your %pre/%post
Hi, all,
I couldn't figure this out from the wiki:
Do updates in -testing go back to pending if they're not pushed to
stable in some amount of time?
I'd like to see a tor security update make it to -updates. The
package's page:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1522
Hi,
Any sign of a rawhide push or has something gone amiss?
TTFN
Paul
--
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 06/23/2009 01:33 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/24/2009 01:59 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/23/2009 11:36 PM, topdog wrote:
Author: topdog
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/php-pecl-geoip/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2525/devel
On the
Martin Langhoff writes:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Seth Vidalskvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
they're not insolvable - they are just very very very hard.
:-)
At the end of the day, if the OS doesn't give you atomic multi-file
transactions, and your %pre/%post scripts aren't also
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 14:12, Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Following the last official rawhide update (21st was it?), my desktop
has been hosed.
I've updated to the latest xorg-server and intel drivers (plus a few
others) as well as gdm and anything else I can think off.
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:31 +0200, Jesse Keating wrote:
If you have any ideas I'd like to hear them. A super epoch has already
been suggested but that just masks the problem and may cause unwanted
downgrades. Any solution either involves severly limiting what kind of
updates can be done
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Then with the switch to koji+bodhi a few package owners complained loudly
about false positives that were caused by pending builds, which were not
found in the master repo yet. A few other package owners jumped upon the
train and questioned the usefulness of the script,
On Jun 24, 2009, at 0:46, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:31 +0200, Jesse Keating wrote:
If you have any ideas I'd like to hear them. A super epoch has
already
been suggested but that just masks the problem and may cause unwanted
downgrades. Any
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
For example people with updates-testing enabled on fc10 got a
non-upgraded yum because the versions were the same (except for
fc10/fc11) and it stopped working because python went from 2.5 to
2.6 So to RPM the fc10/fc11 isn't being compared, at least not that
I
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Does anaconda currently force installs of core packages such as yum?
No.
This is quite important if the version in the old distro is newer than
that on the DVD.
You just end up with a broken yum.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 11:40 -0400, TK009 wrote:
As to the bug itself, I can not and will not speak for why it bothers
the OP. To answer your question though, it bothers me because I don't
want packages on my machine I don't need. As it is my machine that is
reason enough. Size is irrelevant.
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/22/2009 12:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Not possible while we allow people to keep making updates to the older
releases. Those updates quickly become version ( not just release even
) higher than the static copies on the release medium and repos.
Is there any
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 20:53 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:49 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
I've opened a movie in totem, the main volume level is somewhere in the
range of 70%, however totem is at about 4%. The movie is too quiet so
I've
Peter Hutterer wrote:
Just a notice, if your package requires XInput.h to build, you will need
to change the BuildRequires from xorg-x11-proto-devel to libXi. The header
file has moved there.
To be more precise, it has moved to libXi-devel (where it belongs :-) ).
Kevin Kofler
--
Rawhide deployed a xorg-update, while various drivers haven't been
updated so there's a version mismatch.
I use the vesa driver for now (also quite unstable, due to what seem
to be pixman bugs), however an updated intel-driver should be out soon
(hopefully).
- Clemens
2009/6/23 Paul
Bill McGonigle wrote:
Do updates in -testing go back to pending if they're not pushed to
stable in some amount of time?
No, they just sit there, unless they're explicitly unpushed.
Additionally, the package maintainer isn't able to get the bodhi client
to work
Then he should just use the
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 10:06 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:57:53PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
b.2) extend the autorequires/autoprovides in some (handwaves) way to
better indicate the desired match
I like this idea better. AutoReq/Prov should
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Martin
Langhoffmartin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Seth Vidalskvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
they're not insolvable - they are just very very very hard.
:-)
At the end of the day,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Clemens Eissererlinuxhi...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Optimizing for P4 is ... messy
2) If you're using C2D, etc., you can already use the 64-bit distro.
So why not stay with generic, where most users would benefit.
Sure I could use 64-bit, as could all the others
+1 For the i686 with atom optimizations. This seems like a solid suggestion
and Gregory's argument seems logical.
-Adam
(From my G1)
On Jun 23, 2009 11:49 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Clemens Eissererlinuxhi...@gmail.com
wrote: 1) Optimizing
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-RT-Client-REST/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24373
Modified Files:
sources
Added Files:
perl-RT-Client-REST.spec
Log Message:
* Mon Apr 20 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.37-1
- submission
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506389
Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: ixs
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Sys-SigAction/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16959
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Sys-SigAction.spec sources
Log Message:
* Thu Jun 23 2009 Andreas Thienemann andr...@bawue.net - 0.11-1
- Update to 0.11
Index:
Author: awjb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Tk/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30888/F-10
Modified Files:
perl-Tk.spec
Added Files:
perl-Tk-events.patch
Log Message:
- fix events (#489228, #491536, #506496)
perl-Tk-events.patch:
--- NEW FILE
Author: awjb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Tk/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30888/F-11
Modified Files:
perl-Tk.spec
Added Files:
perl-Tk-events.patch
Log Message:
- fix events (#489228, #491536, #506496)
perl-Tk-events.patch:
--- NEW FILE
Author: awjb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Tk/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8673/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Tk.spec
Added Files:
perl-Tk-getOpenFile.patch
Log Message:
- fix getOpenFile (#487122)
perl-Tk-getOpenFile.patch:
--- NEW FILE
Author: awjb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Tk/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8673/F-11
Modified Files:
perl-Tk.spec
Added Files:
perl-Tk-getOpenFile.patch
Log Message:
- fix getOpenFile (#487122)
perl-Tk-getOpenFile.patch:
--- NEW FILE
Author: awjb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Tk/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30888/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Tk.spec
Added Files:
perl-Tk-events.patch
Log Message:
- fix events (#489228, #491536, #506496)
perl-Tk-events.patch:
--- NEW FILE
Author: awjb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Tk/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10850
Added Files:
perl-Tk-getOpenFile.patch
Log Message:
- openfile patch
perl-Tk-getOpenFile.patch:
--- NEW FILE perl-Tk-getOpenFile.patch ---
--- Tk/FBox.pm.orig 2009-06-22
Author: awjb
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Tk/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8673/F-10
Modified Files:
perl-Tk.spec
Log Message:
- fix getOpenFile (#487122)
Index: perl-Tk.spec
===
RCS file:
Author: eseyman
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20085/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session.spec
Log Message:
Initial import.
Author: eseyman
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23430/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session.spec
Log Message:
Initial import.
Author: eseyman
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25104/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session.spec
Log Message:
Initial import.
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-Amazon/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5083
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Net-Amazon.spec sources
Log Message:
* Wed Jun 24 2009 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.54-1
- update to latest upstream
Index:
48 matches
Mail list logo
